Topic: FAO: TGComix
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,737
https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/1723567/bangkok-rocked-by-bomb-blitz
Are you OK? I hope you weren't prancing about town in your opera cape at the time.
Are you OK? I hope you weren't prancing about town in your opera cape at the time.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,023,532
He is ok. He was safe inside of a fortified underage ladyboy bar.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 54 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,533
He may not be able to reply immediately. He's busy helping people who are injured finding young boys.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,604
Oh look, a thread making light of child abuse by people who claim to be sickened by it.
vocalon joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,605
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,606
@previous (vocalon)
This board? Yes, to be honest. The projecting pedophiles used to be concentrated over on Tinychan. Now a couple of them have sneaked over here. If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
This board? Yes, to be honest. The projecting pedophiles used to be concentrated over on Tinychan. Now a couple of them have sneaked over here. If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,618
Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/. joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,622
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,668
@1,023,606 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
> If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
Kimmo Alms joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,669
@1,023,606 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)> sneaked over
> sneaked
It is "snuck", psychotic fucktard troll!
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,675
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,683
@1,023,669 (Kimmo Alms)
> > sneaked over
> > sneaked
>
> It is "snuck", psychotic fucktard troll!
Only if you're a modernist who loves dumbing things down.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/snuck-or-sneaked-which-is-correct
> > sneaked over
> > sneaked
>
> It is "snuck", psychotic fucktard troll!
Only if you're a modernist who loves dumbing things down.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/snuck-or-sneaked-which-is-correct
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,699
@1,023,668 (A)
> > If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
> Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
Sssshhhhh, peace child. I'm not trying to take your forum for posting your child sex fantasies away from you. I'm merely mocking you for it.
> > If I weren't a real priest I think it would be fun to pretend to be one, in order to goad the pedophiles into revealing themselves.
> Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
Sssshhhhh, peace child. I'm not trying to take your forum for posting your child sex fantasies away from you. I'm merely mocking you for it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,722
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> child sex fantasies
Please cite, in this thread, where you think I made a comment about this, your favourite subject which you have highlighted in all of your own comments so far. I started this thread merely inquiring as to your safety, and this is how you repay me? You're not a very nice priest.
> child sex fantasies
Please cite, in this thread, where you think I made a comment about this, your favourite subject which you have highlighted in all of your own comments so far. I started this thread merely inquiring as to your safety, and this is how you repay me? You're not a very nice priest.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,724
@previous (A)
> > child sex fantasies
> Please cite, in this thread, where you think I made a comment about this
I never mentioned you. Stop being so paranoid.
> > child sex fantasies
> Please cite, in this thread, where you think I made a comment about this
I never mentioned you. Stop being so paranoid.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,725
@1,023,683 (J)
> merriam-webster
At least use a proper dictionary, like Oxford or Collins, if you're going to try criticising people's English.
> merriam-webster
At least use a proper dictionary, like Oxford or Collins, if you're going to try criticising people's English.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,726
@previous (K)
> > merriam-webster
> At least use a proper dictionary, like Oxford
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/sneak_1
The usual past form is sneaked, but snuck BrE /snʌk/ ; NAmE /snʌk/ is now very common in informal speech in North American English
> > merriam-webster
> At least use a proper dictionary, like Oxford
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/sneak_1
The usual past form is sneaked, but snuck BrE /snʌk/ ; NAmE /snʌk/ is now very common in informal speech in North American English
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,727
@1,023,724 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > > Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
> > Sssshhhhh, peace child ... your forum for posting your child sex fantasies
> I never mentioned you.
Er, you responded directly to my comment. Am I to suppose you were squinting at Anon B when you wrote that?
> > > Yes, keep chanting this fundamental mantra of your M.O., TGComix.
> > Sssshhhhh, peace child ... your forum for posting your child sex fantasies
> I never mentioned you.
Er, you responded directly to my comment. Am I to suppose you were squinting at Anon B when you wrote that?
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,731
@1,023,726 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> common in North American English
Irrelevant and only put there to appease Americans. Everybody knows there's no such language. Thanks.
> common in North American English
Irrelevant and only put there to appease Americans. Everybody knows there's no such language. Thanks.