Topic: I finally proved that Father Merrin is a fake priest
Priestbuster 3000 started this discussion 6 years ago #89,552
He said that he gave the homily last Sunday on a verse from Galatians. However, all Catholic priests follow the same liturgical schedule, which tells them which verse to preach about. Last Sunday was John 1:1. Busted!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,021,723
No he said he read galatians.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,724
@OP
> Last Sunday was John 1:1. Busted!
You keep changing your story. In this thread you claimed it was Luke 1:1.
http://minichan.org/topic/89477#reply_1021331
And as pointed out to you in that thread, the only thing you have "finally proved" is that you have no idea what the terms you are using actually mean.
> Last Sunday was John 1:1. Busted!
You keep changing your story. In this thread you claimed it was Luke 1:1.
http://minichan.org/topic/89477#reply_1021331
And as pointed out to you in that thread, the only thing you have "finally proved" is that you have no idea what the terms you are using actually mean.
Priestbuster 3000 (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,727
Priestbuster 3000 (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,728
Priestbuster 3000 (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,729
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,730
Actually wasting time trying to prove he isn't a priest or him trying to prove he is a priest is a waste of time unless your brain is so burnt out from booze and drugs. Anyone with only a couple of brain cells left knows a fucking priest wouldn't waste time in a place like this. Especially all the time used trying to prove he is...no real priest would do it or care. Enjoy his shtick but to think anyone with half a brain believes it is fucking hilarious.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,731
@1,021,729 (Priestbuster 3000)
> That is literally what I said.
It isn't. Again, look up the terms you're using.
> That is literally what I said.
It isn't. Again, look up the terms you're using.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,732
@1,021,729 (Priestbuster 3000)
No you said his homily was based on galatians.
Idk about you but I really did grow up Catholic.
No you said his homily was based on galatians.
Idk about you but I really did grow up Catholic.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,735
@1,021,728 (Priestbuster 3000)
> I grew up Catholic, bitch.
Then it's all the more surprising you don't know a thing about what happens at a Catholic service.
> I grew up Catholic, bitch.
Then it's all the more surprising you don't know a thing about what happens at a Catholic service.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,741
Is there a single person here or anywhere on the planet who actually thinks Father Merrin is an ordained Catholic priest?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,742
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,776
@OP
@1,021,727 (Priestbuster 3000)
@1,021,728 (Priestbuster 3000)
@1,021,729 (Priestbuster 3000)
This is literally the funniest self-own since my old pal Omen walked head-first into admitting he'd been lying about serving as a "military police officer":
https://tinychan.org/topic/52623#reply_558678
Thank you for the laughs, OP. And do let us know if you require further information on how Catholic services work.
@1,021,727 (Priestbuster 3000)
@1,021,728 (Priestbuster 3000)
@1,021,729 (Priestbuster 3000)
This is literally the funniest self-own since my old pal Omen walked head-first into admitting he'd been lying about serving as a "military police officer":
https://tinychan.org/topic/52623#reply_558678
Thank you for the laughs, OP. And do let us know if you require further information on how Catholic services work.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,778
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,779
@1,021,741 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Is there a single person here or anywhere on the planet who actually thinks Father Merrin is an ordained Catholic priest?
"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word 'darkness' on the walls of his cell" - C.S.Lewis.
In a similar way, the truth of my being a priest remains unaffected and undiminished by whether or not people believe it. But regardless, I am one.
> Is there a single person here or anywhere on the planet who actually thinks Father Merrin is an ordained Catholic priest?
"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word 'darkness' on the walls of his cell" - C.S.Lewis.
In a similar way, the truth of my being a priest remains unaffected and undiminished by whether or not people believe it. But regardless, I am one.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,780
@1,021,741 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Is there a single person here or anywhere on the planet who actually thinks Father Merrin is an ordained Catholic priest?
Of course not. Just shtick. He is a real pedo and not a fake pedo.
> Is there a single person here or anywhere on the planet who actually thinks Father Merrin is an ordained Catholic priest?
Of course not. Just shtick. He is a real pedo and not a fake pedo.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,782
I’m a Presbyterian but I’m Team Father Merrin.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,783
@1,021,730 (D)
> a f*cking priest wouldn't waste time in a place like this.
Why do you assume priests are some rarified species who do nothing outside of their churches? As modern priests we go where we feel ministry is most needed. That includes Minichan, a forum most famous for offering advice on how to cheaply end one's life, which is one of the most egregious of sins.
Honestly, you needn't think of us priests as radically different from yourselves. The only real difference between a Catholic priest and a Minichan regular is the lack of a sex life. In all other ways we are the same.
God bless us all.
> a f*cking priest wouldn't waste time in a place like this.
Why do you assume priests are some rarified species who do nothing outside of their churches? As modern priests we go where we feel ministry is most needed. That includes Minichan, a forum most famous for offering advice on how to cheaply end one's life, which is one of the most egregious of sins.
Honestly, you needn't think of us priests as radically different from yourselves. The only real difference between a Catholic priest and a Minichan regular is the lack of a sex life. In all other ways we are the same.
God bless us all.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,784
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U triple-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,786
@1,021,780 (H)
> pedo...pedo....
Oh look, a post about pedophilia that had nothing to do with the thread. It's almost like you wait for a chance to talk about your favorite subject and something goads it out of you.
> pedo...pedo....
Oh look, a post about pedophilia that had nothing to do with the thread. It's almost like you wait for a chance to talk about your favorite subject and something goads it out of you.
Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/. replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,788
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,797
Why has nobody caught on that this Merrin persona is named after the priest in The Exorcist?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,799
Anonymous K double-posted this 6 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,800
You are all apparently too stupid to understand the point. There is a Catholic liturgical calendar. Before the homily, there is a reading. It is the same reading for every Catholic church. The priest then gives a homily with that reading as a base for the topic. Sunday's reading was Luke 1:1, but Merrin says he gave the homily on Galatians. Surely you are not all too thick to see how that proves he is fake?
lol replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,802
@previous (K)
Sorry sure you're right but everyone knows Merrin is a fake priest. On other website there are priests proud to post with real names and photos.
Merrin is just a fictional movie character.
Sorry sure you're right but everyone knows Merrin is a fake priest. On other website there are priests proud to post with real names and photos.
Merrin is just a fictional movie character.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,803
@previous (lol)
Well obviously. It is obviously TGComix, aka Bobby2Sox, aka Father Merrin, aka Joshy who eats peepee, aka Joshy who prances about Bangkok in a Victorian opera cape, gaily and merrily flitting from underage ladyboy bar to underage ladyboy bar.
Well obviously. It is obviously TGComix, aka Bobby2Sox, aka Father Merrin, aka Joshy who eats peepee, aka Joshy who prances about Bangkok in a Victorian opera cape, gaily and merrily flitting from underage ladyboy bar to underage ladyboy bar.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,804
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,805
@1,021,803 (K)
Odd thing is that TG-Comix on scatchan, was proud to justify why his grooming of young boys was helpful. He said there was no one else to show them any love.
Odd thing is that TG-Comix on scatchan, was proud to justify why his grooming of young boys was helpful. He said there was no one else to show them any love.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,806
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,807
@1,021,800 (K)
We all understand generally what you're saying, but there are zero people here who think he is a real priest. This is like conclusively proving that the guy you met on the Las Vegas strip dressed like Elvis isn't actually Elvis because he didn't know the chronological order of Elvis' discography. He wasn't fooling anyone to begin with.
We all understand generally what you're saying, but there are zero people here who think he is a real priest. This is like conclusively proving that the guy you met on the Las Vegas strip dressed like Elvis isn't actually Elvis because he didn't know the chronological order of Elvis' discography. He wasn't fooling anyone to begin with.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,808
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Is it, in fact, like conclusively proving that Syntax is a creepy stalker?
Is it, in fact, like conclusively proving that Syntax is a creepy stalker?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,810
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,811
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,813
@1,021,800 (K)
Also grew up Catholic, and also knew no real priests would have been reading from Galatians last Sunday... but then I (like everybody else here) also already knew that TGComix isn't a real Catholic priest (for fuck's sake).
However I'm sure he delights in making you try to prove that he isn't, because he thinks he some kind of amazing troll. He will also no doubt continue to plug the same priest schtick, regardless, until he gets bored of it and moves onto his next scheme, which will be equally lame & transparent and of course somehow related to pedophilia. He alone will continue to think that he is a genius and wank himself to sleep over it every night.
Also grew up Catholic, and also knew no real priests would have been reading from Galatians last Sunday... but then I (like everybody else here) also already knew that TGComix isn't a real Catholic priest (for fuck's sake).
However I'm sure he delights in making you try to prove that he isn't, because he thinks he some kind of amazing troll. He will also no doubt continue to plug the same priest schtick, regardless, until he gets bored of it and moves onto his next scheme, which will be equally lame & transparent and of course somehow related to pedophilia. He alone will continue to think that he is a genius and wank himself to sleep over it every night.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,814
I haven’t seen anyone post proof that Father Merrin isn’t a priest yet
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,815
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,817
@1,021,804 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It's just that nobody seems to have mentioned it, or maybe I missed where they did.
It's just that nobody seems to have mentioned it, or maybe I missed where they did.
Autist !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,818
@1,021,814 (I)
The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Father Merrin has to prove he is a priest.
The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Father Merrin has to prove he is a priest.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,819
@previous (Autist !StaYqkzUPc)
> The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Father Merrin has to prove he is a priest.
You just moved the goalposts and committed a logical fallacy
> The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Father Merrin has to prove he is a priest.
You just moved the goalposts and committed a logical fallacy
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,820
@1,021,813 (J)
Disagree. He will stick with the priest shtick because that way he can defend pedophiles.
Disagree. He will stick with the priest shtick because that way he can defend pedophiles.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,821
Father Merrin Supporter !kAVDl7M5Y2 replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,824
I’m committed to preventing mob action against Father Merrin
Ouch replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,825
@1,021,821 (J)
The only people defending the Catholic Church are the troves of attorneys.
https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/09/does_the_federal_anti-racketee.html
Mired in scandal, is the Catholic Church an 'organized crime' group?
David Hickton, former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, is confident that federal anti-racketeering laws could be applied to prosecute the Catholic Church and/or dioceses for their role in the clergy sex abuse crisis.
Way to much text to copy and paste.
The only people defending the Catholic Church are the troves of attorneys.
https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/09/does_the_federal_anti-racketee.html
Mired in scandal, is the Catholic Church an 'organized crime' group?
David Hickton, former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, is confident that federal anti-racketeering laws could be applied to prosecute the Catholic Church and/or dioceses for their role in the clergy sex abuse crisis.
Way to much text to copy and paste.
Father Merrin Supporter !kAVDl7M5Y2 replied with this 6 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,827
@previous (Ouch)
> The only people defending the Catholic Church are the troves of attorneys.
>
> https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/09/does_the_federal_anti-racketee.html
>
> Mired in scandal, is the Catholic Church an 'organized crime' group?
>
> David Hickton, former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, is confident that federal anti-racketeering laws could be applied to prosecute the Catholic Church and/or dioceses for their role in the clergy sex abuse crisis.
>
> Way to much text to copy and paste.
Wish you would step off that ledge my friend
> The only people defending the Catholic Church are the troves of attorneys.
>
> https://www.pennlive.com/news/2018/09/does_the_federal_anti-racketee.html
>
> Mired in scandal, is the Catholic Church an 'organized crime' group?
>
> David Hickton, former U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, is confident that federal anti-racketeering laws could be applied to prosecute the Catholic Church and/or dioceses for their role in the clergy sex abuse crisis.
>
> Way to much text to copy and paste.
Wish you would step off that ledge my friend
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,829
Ionize tg2merrin
Reason: pedo
Reason: pedo
The Detector !CvN76YZRw2 replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,832
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 56 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,834
@1,021,817 (J)
I don't think anyone pointed it out explicitly but if you google "father merrin" it's the entire first page of search results so it's not exactly a secret either.
I don't think anyone pointed it out explicitly but if you google "father merrin" it's the entire first page of search results so it's not exactly a secret either.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,836
@1,021,817 (J)
https://minichan.org/topic/89510#reply_1021480
Here's TG larping as Merrin in response to a post from his nemesis, Pazuzu.
https://minichan.org/topic/89510#reply_1021480
Here's TG larping as Merrin in response to a post from his nemesis, Pazuzu.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,837
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,959
@1,021,800 (K)
> You are all apparently too stupid to understand the point.
No, we all got the point. You have no idea what happens at a Catholic service (it is very obvious you hastily looked up what "homily" means after you illustrated you think it's the same as a sermon) and you have never been present at one when the priest or deacon will connect the Scripture readings to the daily lives of the congregation, bringing in other readings and Bible passages.
So, yeah, we all "got the point": you started out wrong and just kept on digging that hole deeper for yourself. Very reminiscent of a certain 'Matthew' I must say.
> You are all apparently too stupid to understand the point.
No, we all got the point. You have no idea what happens at a Catholic service (it is very obvious you hastily looked up what "homily" means after you illustrated you think it's the same as a sermon) and you have never been present at one when the priest or deacon will connect the Scripture readings to the daily lives of the congregation, bringing in other readings and Bible passages.
So, yeah, we all "got the point": you started out wrong and just kept on digging that hole deeper for yourself. Very reminiscent of a certain 'Matthew' I must say.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,960
@1,021,813 (J)
> Also grew up Catholic, and also knew no real priests would have been reading from Galatians last Sunday
It's remarkable how many people all of sudden "grew up Catholic" and by a remarkable coincidence are repeating the exact same basic mistake that OP is making.
> Also grew up Catholic, and also knew no real priests would have been reading from Galatians last Sunday
It's remarkable how many people all of sudden "grew up Catholic" and by a remarkable coincidence are repeating the exact same basic mistake that OP is making.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U triple-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,961
@1,021,807 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> We all understand generally what you're saying
That until yesterday he had no idea what "homily" meant, the part it plays in a Catholic service, and has been frantically Googling it all as he goes along with hilariously erroneous results? Yep, we all generally get that.
> but there are zero people here who think he is a real priest.
Evidently not true according to this thread my friend :)
> We all understand generally what you're saying
That until yesterday he had no idea what "homily" meant, the part it plays in a Catholic service, and has been frantically Googling it all as he goes along with hilariously erroneous results? Yep, we all generally get that.
> but there are zero people here who think he is a real priest.
Evidently not true according to this thread my friend :)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,962
@1,021,797 (J)
> Why has nobody caught on that this Merrin persona is named after the priest in The Exorcist?
HA!! I'm pretty sure everyone knew that from the start my friend :) When deciding to post here I took the name of a fellow priest whom I find most inspirational. I was hardly likely to use my real priest's name. There are people here who do an awful lot of stalking you know.
> Why has nobody caught on that this Merrin persona is named after the priest in The Exorcist?
HA!! I'm pretty sure everyone knew that from the start my friend :) When deciding to post here I took the name of a fellow priest whom I find most inspirational. I was hardly likely to use my real priest's name. There are people here who do an awful lot of stalking you know.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U quintuple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,963
@1,021,832 (The Detector !CvN76YZRw2)
> Merrin why did you change your UID.
It would appear your 'detector' skills are wayward yet again my friend :)
> Merrin why did you change your UID.
It would appear your 'detector' skills are wayward yet again my friend :)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U sextuple-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,965
@1,021,814 (I)
> I haven’t seen anyone post proof that Father Merrin isn’t a priest yet
Remarkable isn't it? This person who keeps (wrongly) insisting I am not a real priest, yet can provide not one shred of evidence to back up his claim. It's very much a pattern with the anti-Catholic brigade: so many hysterical claims, zero proof to corroborate them. See for example Syntax's constant flood of copypasta from addled-loon.conspiracy.org
> I haven’t seen anyone post proof that Father Merrin isn’t a priest yet
Remarkable isn't it? This person who keeps (wrongly) insisting I am not a real priest, yet can provide not one shred of evidence to back up his claim. It's very much a pattern with the anti-Catholic brigade: so many hysterical claims, zero proof to corroborate them. See for example Syntax's constant flood of copypasta from addled-loon.conspiracy.org
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U septuple-posted this 6 years ago, 50 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,966
In conclusion, I bless everyone here! I'm now off to attend to my priestly duties.
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,967
@1,021,959 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,960 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,961 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,962 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,963 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,965 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Wow, somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed today. Aw, diddums.
@1,021,960 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,961 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,962 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,963 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@1,021,965 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Wow, somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed today. Aw, diddums.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,968
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,969
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,970
@previous (R)
That one took 15 minutes. I have many priestly duties throughout ther day. Thankfully for everyone here I am able to check in regularly. Bless you for the question, friend!
That one took 15 minutes. I have many priestly duties throughout ther day. Thankfully for everyone here I am able to check in regularly. Bless you for the question, friend!
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,971
@1,021,962 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Nobody had actually spelled it out though, or maybe I didn't search enough - I'm not so obsessed as to go trawling through the chan history. I thought it worth doing so because it's relevant to your general M.O., given the subject of this thread. It's similar to when you got people thinking that your real name was actually Simon Kirby (back when you were a shitty cartoonist who drew/traced smooth shiny bottoms) and nobody seemed to realize that was clearly a reference to Jack Kirby and Joe Simon of Timely Comics.
Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Nobody had actually spelled it out though, or maybe I didn't search enough - I'm not so obsessed as to go trawling through the chan history. I thought it worth doing so because it's relevant to your general M.O., given the subject of this thread. It's similar to when you got people thinking that your real name was actually Simon Kirby (back when you were a shitty cartoonist who drew/traced smooth shiny bottoms) and nobody seemed to realize that was clearly a reference to Jack Kirby and Joe Simon of Timely Comics.
Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,972
@previous (J)
> Nobody had actually spelled it out though
Perhaps people thought that something so blindingly obvious didn't need "spelling out". In other words, they didn't bank on you being here ;)
> Nobody had actually spelled it out though
Perhaps people thought that something so blindingly obvious didn't need "spelling out". In other words, they didn't bank on you being here ;)
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,973
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,974
@previous (J)
There was a question within all that wall of raging text? I tuned out midway though. Be more concise in your questions please. A priest's time is precious.
There was a question within all that wall of raging text? I tuned out midway though. Be more concise in your questions please. A priest's time is precious.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,976
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Ah yes, I keep forgetting about your poor reading and comprehension skills, or lack thereof. A question is an interrogative sentence or phrase, normally denoted with a question mark - '?' - at the end.
Here is my question again, highlighted for your convenience - you're welcome:
> Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Ah yes, I keep forgetting about your poor reading and comprehension skills, or lack thereof. A question is an interrogative sentence or phrase, normally denoted with a question mark - '?' - at the end.
Here is my question again, highlighted for your convenience - you're welcome:
> Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,978
@previous (J)
I managed to make it a little over halfway through that time before tuning out. Please just ask your question already without a huge preamble. I have no time to waste on long-windedness.
I managed to make it a little over halfway through that time before tuning out. Please just ask your question already without a huge preamble. I have no time to waste on long-windedness.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,979
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Still avoiding the question are we? What's the matter, TG? Are you in a rather difficult corner? Do you find all this particularly embarrassing?
Still avoiding the question are we? What's the matter, TG? Are you in a rather difficult corner? Do you find all this particularly embarrassing?
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,980
@1,021,968 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Thought you said you're answering questions because that's what priests do. Would also like to know the answer to this one:
> Are you still a cartoonist
Thought you said you're answering questions because that's what priests do. Would also like to know the answer to this one:
> Are you still a cartoonist
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,981
@1,021,979 (J)
So all this time it turns out you wanted to 'ask' 4 rhetorical questions. I suppose you think it's funny to utterly waste someone's time with ludicrous back-and-forths like this.
So all this time it turns out you wanted to 'ask' 4 rhetorical questions. I suppose you think it's funny to utterly waste someone's time with ludicrous back-and-forths like this.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,982
@1,021,980 (R)
That question is flawed as a question. It presupposes information that cannot be presupposed. Would you like me to demonstrate why? Very well, answer this question yes or no: do you still assault women?
That question is flawed as a question. It presupposes information that cannot be presupposed. Would you like me to demonstrate why? Very well, answer this question yes or no: do you still assault women?
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,983
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> yes or no: do you still assault women
OK, no.
See, easy. If it wasn't a yes/no question I would qualify with "I have never assaulted women". Can you say the same about drawing cartoons?
> yes or no: do you still assault women
OK, no.
See, easy. If it wasn't a yes/no question I would qualify with "I have never assaulted women". Can you say the same about drawing cartoons?
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,984
@1,021,981 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I suppose you think it's funny to utterly waste someone's time with ludicrous back-and-forths like this.
Yes, yes I do. It's particularly hilarious when it's your time being wasted, TG. And it's even funnier when you are this riled up.
@1,021,982 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> It presupposes information that cannot be presupposed.
Of course it can be presupposed that you used to draw shitty hentai. You have admitted many times that you are TGComix. The fact that you refuse to answer this simple question speaks volumes.
> I suppose you think it's funny to utterly waste someone's time with ludicrous back-and-forths like this.
Yes, yes I do. It's particularly hilarious when it's your time being wasted, TG. And it's even funnier when you are this riled up.
@1,021,982 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> It presupposes information that cannot be presupposed.
Of course it can be presupposed that you used to draw shitty hentai. You have admitted many times that you are TGComix. The fact that you refuse to answer this simple question speaks volumes.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 45 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,985
@1,021,983 (R)
> > yes or no: do you still assault women
> OK, no.
So you used to assault women? Disgusting. I shall pray for you.
> > yes or no: do you still assault women
> OK, no.
So you used to assault women? Disgusting. I shall pray for you.
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,986
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Only proves it doesn't work as a simple yes/no question and I believe that's not how the original question was posed. You failed to read on where I said I never assaulted women. Again, can you say the same about never having drawn cartoons? Don't think you can.
Only proves it doesn't work as a simple yes/no question and I believe that's not how the original question was posed. You failed to read on where I said I never assaulted women. Again, can you say the same about never having drawn cartoons? Don't think you can.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,987
@previous (R)
> that's not how the original question was posed
This. Give up - he's never going to answer.
> that's not how the original question was posed
This. Give up - he's never going to answer.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,988
@1,021,986 (R)
> Only proves it doesn't work as a simple yes/no question
Then why did you answer:
> "OK, no.
> See, easy"
?
> and I believe that's not how the original question was posed.
See:
@1,021,980 (R)
> Are you still a cartoonist
You're not very bright are you?
@1,021,986 (R)
> can you say the same about never having drawn cartoons? Don't think you can.
Why do you think this?
> Only proves it doesn't work as a simple yes/no question
Then why did you answer:
> "OK, no.
> See, easy"
?
> and I believe that's not how the original question was posed.
See:
@1,021,980 (R)
> Are you still a cartoonist
You're not very bright are you?
@1,021,986 (R)
> can you say the same about never having drawn cartoons? Don't think you can.
Why do you think this?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,989
@1,021,987 (J)
> > that's not how the original question was posed
> Give up
Take his advice anon R. You've had an absolute nightmare in this thread.
> > that's not how the original question was posed
> Give up
Take his advice anon R. You've had an absolute nightmare in this thread.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,995
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,021,998
@1,021,988 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Please reference where the original question demanded that you only answer yes or no. That's right, you can't. The original question which you will not answer was
@1,021,971 (J)
> Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Please reference where the original question demanded that you only answer yes or no. That's right, you can't. The original question which you will not answer was
@1,021,971 (J)
> Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 58 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,000
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,008
@1,021,998 (R)
> The original question was:
> > Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Which is a yes/no question.
You've had a mare here. Played an absolute shocker. You came in here to try and bail anon J out of his hole and ended up joining him in it :)
> The original question was:
> > Are you still a cartoonist, or was that also just a long drawn out pedo-larp-fantasy?
Which is a yes/no question.
You've had a mare here. Played an absolute shocker. You came in here to try and bail anon J out of his hole and ended up joining him in it :)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,009
@1,022,000 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
> which is a very dadrock movie
I find it to be a wonderful movie about the triumph of Catholic strength over evil. Damien sacrificing his own life to vanquish evil and save the child mirrors Christ's own sacrifice. Bless you friend.
> which is a very dadrock movie
I find it to be a wonderful movie about the triumph of Catholic strength over evil. Damien sacrificing his own life to vanquish evil and save the child mirrors Christ's own sacrifice. Bless you friend.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 53 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,023
@1,022,008 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Lol, you are SO riled up about this! Thanks for playing - been fun as always.
Lol, you are SO riled up about this! Thanks for playing - been fun as always.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,028
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,029
@1,022,023 (J)
> Lol, you are SO riled up about this! Thanks for playing - been fun as always.
how is this fun for you
so fuckin weird
> Lol, you are SO riled up about this! Thanks for playing - been fun as always.
how is this fun for you
so fuckin weird
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,035
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
I guess it's the same kind of kick one gets out of scam-baiting, except instead of it being a scammer it's a pedo. If you can't prevent them from conning people or molesting kids, at least you can waste their time. It's also very low effort for me, whereas for him, given his quick response times it appears that he's spent all day scowling at his screen, desperately trying to hide the fact that he's seething with rage.
I guess it's the same kind of kick one gets out of scam-baiting, except instead of it being a scammer it's a pedo. If you can't prevent them from conning people or molesting kids, at least you can waste their time. It's also very low effort for me, whereas for him, given his quick response times it appears that he's spent all day scowling at his screen, desperately trying to hide the fact that he's seething with rage.
Facts R Us replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,042
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,048
@1,022,035 (J)
@previous (Facts R Us)
what????? I never followed this guy around the internet for years so all of this is just annoying and strange to me
@previous (Facts R Us)
what????? I never followed this guy around the internet for years so all of this is just annoying and strange to me
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,074
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
I think your opinion would be somewhat different if you knew a bit of his history. He's probably the most colossal cunt I have ever encountered online.
I think your opinion would be somewhat different if you knew a bit of his history. He's probably the most colossal cunt I have ever encountered online.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,077
@1,022,035 (J)
> I guess it's the same kind of kick one gets out of scam-baiting, except instead of it being a scammer it's a pedo. If you can't prevent them from conning people or molesting kids, at least you can waste their time. It's also very low effort for me, whereas for him, given his quick response times it appears that he's spent all day scowling at his screen, desperately trying to hide the fact that he's seething with rage.
So much projection in this post :) Fascinating window you've given us here into your life.
> I guess it's the same kind of kick one gets out of scam-baiting, except instead of it being a scammer it's a pedo. If you can't prevent them from conning people or molesting kids, at least you can waste their time. It's also very low effort for me, whereas for him, given his quick response times it appears that he's spent all day scowling at his screen, desperately trying to hide the fact that he's seething with rage.
So much projection in this post :) Fascinating window you've given us here into your life.
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 10 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,078
@1,022,074 (J)
idk, we have a lot of scumbags on here and whenever people make it a habit of getting on their case it gets pretty annoying
idk, we have a lot of scumbags on here and whenever people make it a habit of getting on their case it gets pretty annoying
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,080
@1,022,074 (J)
> He's probably the most colossal c*nt I have ever encountered online.
Haha!!! Oh my dear child, how on earth did you allow someone on the internet to dominate your life and emotional well-being like this?? I shall pray for God to assuage your anguish.
> He's probably the most colossal c*nt I have ever encountered online.
Haha!!! Oh my dear child, how on earth did you allow someone on the internet to dominate your life and emotional well-being like this?? I shall pray for God to assuage your anguish.
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,082
@1,022,078 (terri !RwordOooFE)
Only two of them have Encyclopedia Dramatica pages. TG-Comix and Matt.
ninjj, eat more fruits and veggies to help your digestive system.
Only two of them have Encyclopedia Dramatica pages. TG-Comix and Matt.
ninjj, eat more fruits and veggies to help your digestive system.
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,085
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,089
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
95% of your replies are of the Ugh nature. You and Dark-Goth dude make a good paring. Have you looked for help-support for depression?
95% of your replies are of the Ugh nature. You and Dark-Goth dude make a good paring. Have you looked for help-support for depression?
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,098
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 48 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,118
@1,022,082 (M)
> Only two of them have Encyclopedia Dramatica pages. TG-Comix and Matt.
Of these two, Matt is by far the most harmless and seems to be much more intelligent and better educated. He's also open and honest about who he is. On the other hand, TG's ED page is more accurate and cites better evidence of some pretty shocking behaviour - very good reasons why he remains so secretive about his identity.
> Only two of them have Encyclopedia Dramatica pages. TG-Comix and Matt.
Of these two, Matt is by far the most harmless and seems to be much more intelligent and better educated. He's also open and honest about who he is. On the other hand, TG's ED page is more accurate and cites better evidence of some pretty shocking behaviour - very good reasons why he remains so secretive about his identity.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,123
@previous (J)
> very good reasons why he remains so secretive about his identity.
Which is why he hides because otherwise he will be torn to pieces in Jail-Prison.
> very good reasons why he remains so secretive about his identity.
Which is why he hides because otherwise he will be torn to pieces in Jail-Prison.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,152
I like how he stopped posting like fifteen posts after he said he would
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,177
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,180
100 GET
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,237
Looking up what bible verse the catholic church preached on a specific day in order to "bust" some guy on the internet is some seriously Syntax-level stalking.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,238
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> Looking up what bible verse the catholic church preached on a specific day in order to "bust" some guy on the internet is some seriously Syntax-level stalking.
Not to mention a hilarious way of showing that he has no clue how Catholic services work and is just Googling things as he goes along.
> Looking up what bible verse the catholic church preached on a specific day in order to "bust" some guy on the internet is some seriously Syntax-level stalking.
Not to mention a hilarious way of showing that he has no clue how Catholic services work and is just Googling things as he goes along.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,309
@1,022,177 (I)
Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
Satire replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,313
@previous (J)
> and personal attacks
Clearly the type of instruction a real priest will study while in a seminary.
> and personal attacks
Clearly the type of instruction a real priest will study while in a seminary.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,349
@1,022,309 (J)
> Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
I would bet you work at a call center, mid to late twenties, play lots of video games, virgin, no serious relationship ever, high school graduate with some community college, severely depressed
> Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
I would bet you work at a call center, mid to late twenties, play lots of video games, virgin, no serious relationship ever, high school graduate with some community college, severely depressed
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,358
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,402
@previous (J)
Falling back on the "everyone who disagrees with me is TG" defence? I suppose after your embarrassing love letter to Matthew Miller (a guy who requested sexual pictures from a child - tell us more about your disgust for pedophilia, you haven't been projecting quite enough) you had nowhere further left to fall.
It was fun toying with you but I honestly didn't intend to break you like this.
Falling back on the "everyone who disagrees with me is TG" defence? I suppose after your embarrassing love letter to Matthew Miller (a guy who requested sexual pictures from a child - tell us more about your disgust for pedophilia, you haven't been projecting quite enough) you had nowhere further left to fall.
It was fun toying with you but I honestly didn't intend to break you like this.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,403
@1,022,349 (I)
> > Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
>
> I would bet you work at a call center, mid to late twenties, play lots of video games, virgin, no serious relationship ever, high school graduate with some community college, severely depressed
I think this is spot on. That ode to the "show me your vulva, child" guy was really pretty stunning and kind of revealed why he's been so worked up about all this.
> > Er, Matt is demonstrably more erudite. For one thing, he knows far more Latin and about languages in general. For another, he knows how to construct an argument. TG's argument style alternates between straw man and personal attacks, and when that doesn't get him anywhere, he resorts to sock-puppetry... for example, you.
>
> I would bet you work at a call center, mid to late twenties, play lots of video games, virgin, no serious relationship ever, high school graduate with some community college, severely depressed
I think this is spot on. That ode to the "show me your vulva, child" guy was really pretty stunning and kind of revealed why he's been so worked up about all this.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,413
@1,022,402 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Oh, TGComix... The gift that keeps on giving. I can't believe how beautifully that worked again. Push "Jealousy of Matt" button => results!
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Oh, TGComix... The gift that keeps on giving. I can't believe how beautifully that worked again. Push "Jealousy of Matt" button => results!
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,419
@1,022,403 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
We should pray that he doesn’t own any firearms and that he would receive access to mental healthcare asap
We should pray that he doesn’t own any firearms and that he would receive access to mental healthcare asap
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,420
@previous (I)
Yep, he's been pushed over the edge. Now he's trying to walk back his love letter to the 'child vulva guy'. Hilarious but also desperately sad to watch him flailing now.
Yep, he's been pushed over the edge. Now he's trying to walk back his love letter to the 'child vulva guy'. Hilarious but also desperately sad to watch him flailing now.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,421
@1,022,419 (I)
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
And he's STILL ranting and raving. Looks like you're incredibly upset this time, TG. Has your jealousy deepened?
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
And he's STILL ranting and raving. Looks like you're incredibly upset this time, TG. Has your jealousy deepened?
Anonymous R replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,501
lmao. TGcomix so mad about this thread that he's trying to garner support about it on TC, where he also daily gets played like a Strad by Paganini.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,507
@previous (R)
I haven't posted there today. But thank you for keeping everyone informed on TC's latest updates. It's rivetting.
I haven't posted there today. But thank you for keeping everyone informed on TC's latest updates. It's rivetting.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,022,657
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I think more Catholic congregations need weekly updates on what's new on TC/MC. Reaching out across the divides that plague our society.
I think more Catholic congregations need weekly updates on what's new on TC/MC. Reaching out across the divides that plague our society.