Topic: Pope says Catholic Church Not About To Be Out-Molested By Goddamn Boy Scouts
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,395
Yesterday 1:04pmVATICAN CITY—Telling the youth organization that if they come for the king they best not miss, the Catholic Church announced Thursday that it was not about to be out-molested by the goddamn Boy Scouts.
“If some pissant organization like the Scouts thinks they can beat us at the molestation game, then they have another fucking thing coming,” said Pope Francis, directing his message to the Scouts’ leaders
As he stressed that a couple thousand piddling cases was a drop in the bucket compared to the generations of sexual abuse that had made the Catholic Church number-one in molestation for centuries on end.
“We’re talking hundreds of thousands of parishioners, children, and nuns abused by the people they trust most.
Plus, we’re not doing it while hiding out in the woods like a bunch of cowards. We’re just at the back of the church, putting up huge numbers on the board day after day. So don’t come at us with this weak-ass shit, Boy Scouts. We’re the OG diddlers around here.”
At press time, the Catholic Church had offered to send a few dozen priests to the Boy Scouts of America to show them how it’s done.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later[^] [v] #1,020,336
Sometimes I wonder about the tendency of turning the abuse into something which questions the legitimacy of the catholic church, i wonder if maybe it can silence the issue within the church because the issue is heavily associated with the above mentioned.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,356
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,399
What's most disturbing about this OP is how much time and effort has gone into writing what is essentially a thinly-veiled pedophilia fantasy masquerading as laboured satire and faux-outrage against the Catholic Church. If I weren't a real priest, I've often thought it would be interesting to pretend to be one on here in order to coax out more of these patent projection posts.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,414
Ionize tg2merrin
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,418
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,419
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,420
@previous (F)
> So you admit you're TG and also Bobby2Sox?
Why have you vaulted over intermediary stages of logic to reach that conclusion? Consider the following analogous scenario:
"Ionize black people from this site!"
"Making your racist a** cry is not an ionizable offence"
"So you admit you're black?"
Do you see your idiotic mistake?
Bless you my child, I am happy to have edified you.
> So you admit you're TG and also Bobby2Sox?
Why have you vaulted over intermediary stages of logic to reach that conclusion? Consider the following analogous scenario:
"Ionize black people from this site!"
"Making your racist a** cry is not an ionizable offence"
"So you admit you're black?"
Do you see your idiotic mistake?
Bless you my child, I am happy to have edified you.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,421
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > So you admit you're TG and also Bobby2Sox?
>
> Why have you vaulted over intermediary stages of logic to reach that conclusion? Consider the following analogous scenario:
>
> "Ionize black people from this site!"
>
> "Making your racist a** cry is not an ionizable offence"
>
> "So you admit you're black?"
>
> Do you see your idiotic mistake?
>
> Bless you my child, I am happy to have edified you.
Moving goalposts, indicated in block quote as emboldened text.
> > So you admit you're TG and also Bobby2Sox?
>
> Why have you vaulted over intermediary stages of logic to reach that conclusion? Consider the following analogous scenario:
>
> "Ionize black people from this site!"
>
> "Making your racist a** cry is not an ionizable offence"
>
> "So you admit you're black?"
>
> Do you see your idiotic mistake?
>
> Bless you my child, I am happy to have edified you.
Moving goalposts, indicated in block quote as emboldened text.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,422
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,429
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,431
@previous (F)
> Ad Hominids.
Of the primates? I'm presuming you meant to write 'ad hominem', which would have made you slightly less of a flailing dullard :) Bless you my child!
> Ad Hominids.
Of the primates? I'm presuming you meant to write 'ad hominem', which would have made you slightly less of a flailing dullard :) Bless you my child!
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,450
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,452
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,458
> > Ad Hominids
> Of the primates
Also: 'Ad' doesn't mean 'Of'. It means 'to' or 'towards'. Both of you are muppets.
> Of the primates
Also: 'Ad' doesn't mean 'Of'. It means 'to' or 'towards'. Both of you are muppets.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,459
@previous (I)
> > > Ad Hominids
> > Of the primates
>
> Also: 'Ad' doesn't mean 'Of'.
The context of the phrase translates to 'Of'. Try not to translate things word by word through Google, it leads to incoherence. Bless you my child.
> > > Ad Hominids
> > Of the primates
>
> Also: 'Ad' doesn't mean 'Of'.
The context of the phrase translates to 'Of'. Try not to translate things word by word through Google, it leads to incoherence. Bless you my child.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,460
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Anybody with a rudimentary grasp of the most basic Latin knows that that's bullshit. 'Ad' does not mean "of" in any context. 'E' or 'ex' means 'of'. They are two completely different words. The former takes the accusative whereas the latter takes the ablative.
Using your own argument: One does not need to use Google's lamentably pathetic translator when one is sufficiently educated. Thanks.
Anybody with a rudimentary grasp of the most basic Latin knows that that's bullshit. 'Ad' does not mean "of" in any context. 'E' or 'ex' means 'of'. They are two completely different words. The former takes the accusative whereas the latter takes the ablative.
Using your own argument: One does not need to use Google's lamentably pathetic translator when one is sufficiently educated. Thanks.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,465
And he's STILL hastily Googling things that have absolutely no relation to the original issue :)))
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,489
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
And he's STILL desperately trying to project his very own situation onto others :))) Silly boy. What a mess you're making of this thread.
Oh well, I have no idea what nonsense Google is telling you, but I'm glad to see you're at least keen to try and learn the basics. My advice is don't use the internet though, and God forbid Google. Rather purchase Kennedy's Latin Primer - one of the finest text books you will ever find.
And he's STILL desperately trying to project his very own situation onto others :))) Silly boy. What a mess you're making of this thread.
Oh well, I have no idea what nonsense Google is telling you, but I'm glad to see you're at least keen to try and learn the basics. My advice is don't use the internet though, and God forbid Google. Rather purchase Kennedy's Latin Primer - one of the finest text books you will ever find.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,492
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,515
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,519
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,525
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,681
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,685
@1,020,492 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You might have gotten away with this Merrin facade if you hadn't used that multi-chinned smiley monstrosity. Dave from Russia, you are an interesting fellow to say the least.
You might have gotten away with this Merrin facade if you hadn't used that multi-chinned smiley monstrosity. Dave from Russia, you are an interesting fellow to say the least.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,691
@previous (J)
He was quite transparent from early on, even without his favourite ghastly emoticon.
Also technically he's not in Russia, unless you're referring to the USSR?
He was quite transparent from early on, even without his favourite ghastly emoticon.
Also technically he's not in Russia, unless you're referring to the USSR?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,744
A global look at the Catholic Church’s sex abuse problem
https://apnews.com/8cb4daf509464bad8c13ef35d44a0fc5
Bombshell New Report Shows The Catholic Church Spent ...
https://governmentslaves.news/2019/06/07/bombshell-new-report-shows-the-catholic...
A new report released Tuesday reveals that, over the past eight years, the Catholic Church has spent $10.6 million in the northeastern United States to fight legislation that would help victims of pedophile priests sexual abuse seek justice.
Yes the topic was copypasted from a quality source. Satire it may be, yet the foundation of the story is accurate.
https://apnews.com/8cb4daf509464bad8c13ef35d44a0fc5
Bombshell New Report Shows The Catholic Church Spent ...
https://governmentslaves.news/2019/06/07/bombshell-new-report-shows-the-catholic...
A new report released Tuesday reveals that, over the past eight years, the Catholic Church has spent $10.6 million in the northeastern United States to fight legislation that would help victims of pedophile priests sexual abuse seek justice.
Yes the topic was copypasted from a quality source. Satire it may be, yet the foundation of the story is accurate.