Topic: Well Well Well Consider the following Bernie Fail
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,160
The more you know
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-announces-it-will-cut-hours-to-pay-staffers-15-minimum-wage-prompting-mockery
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-announces-it-will-cut-hours-to-pay-staffers-15-minimum-wage-prompting-mockery
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #1,018,281
What did you expect from a democrap?
Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,283
The self-described socialist candidate said junior field organizers earn roughly $36,000 per year in salary, with employer-paid health care and sick leave. But he acknowledged that their salary can effectively dip below $15 per hour if staffers work much more than 40 hours per week, which is common on presidential campaigns.
The solution is to "limit the number of hours staffers work to 42 or 43 each week to ensure they’re making the equivalent of $15 an hour," he told the Register's Brianne Pfannenstiel.
The solution is to "limit the number of hours staffers work to 42 or 43 each week to ensure they’re making the equivalent of $15 an hour," he told the Register's Brianne Pfannenstiel.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,289
Well that's his campaign half fucked from the get go. All of his monetary policies are open to ridicule now. Not that they weren't before, but more so now
Reid joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,291
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,337
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,341
Bilbo !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,342
Is 42 hours a week somehow not enough?
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,347
@previous (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
I think this shows that, that level of minimal wage is not sustainable and that it's really an electoral promise that they will need to break
I think this shows that, that level of minimal wage is not sustainable and that it's really an electoral promise that they will need to break
Bilbo !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,348
@previous (G)
How many hours a week do you consider reasonable? Also they're not on a wage, they're on a salary.
How many hours a week do you consider reasonable? Also they're not on a wage, they're on a salary.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,351
@1,018,342 (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
no, the Bernie staffer Union wants to work more and get paid more and also the same medical benefits that they already have but the Bernie staff man says 'you can have your health or your money you stupid cucks' that's what he said
no, the Bernie staffer Union wants to work more and get paid more and also the same medical benefits that they already have but the Bernie staff man says 'you can have your health or your money you stupid cucks' that's what he said
q. joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,492
why is that bad now??? it sux to work less hours but theyre not getting paid less.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,529
Inb4 he hires illegal immigrants