Topic: Vegetarians are against nature
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,153
They can have their preferences I suppose. I just think their perception of enlightenment is absurd though.
First and foremost the reason animals are here is to be eaten.
First and foremost the reason animals are here is to be eaten.
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,018,216
Actually meat consumption has increased way beyond what's "natural".
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,233
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,238
Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,239
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,241
There's nothing natural about factory farms wtf. Also pre-agricultutal humans weren't running around eating meat 14x a week.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,243
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,244
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,245
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,246
@1,018,244 (A)
So you don't, on average, eat meat twice a day? Like eggs and bacon in the morning, and chicken & rice for dinner?
So you don't, on average, eat meat twice a day? Like eggs and bacon in the morning, and chicken & rice for dinner?
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,247
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,248
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 18 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,249
@1,018,247 (tteh !GETFUCKED)
Yeah it was outrageous to suggest that people eat meat 14x a yottasecond.
Yeah it was outrageous to suggest that people eat meat 14x a yottasecond.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,250
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 11 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,251
@1,018,248 (A)
No what we should do is continue to believe whatever the first thing we ever believed was for all eternity.
No what we should do is continue to believe whatever the first thing we ever believed was for all eternity.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,252
tteh !GETFUCKED replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,254
@1,018,250 (A)
Like, 14 different meat products or 14 separate meat-based meals, within that hour? I guess I've done the former if you include buffets and the like.
Like, 14 different meat products or 14 separate meat-based meals, within that hour? I guess I've done the former if you include buffets and the like.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,255
@1,018,252 (A)
That's incredibly dumb and also you are now shifting the topic of conversation to something totally unrelated. Anyway, if you wanted to be conservative, you'd love in a nomadic community subsisting on nuts, berries, and whatever small game you were able to trap. Your teeth would fall out by age 40 and you'd likely die shortly thereafter.
That's incredibly dumb and also you are now shifting the topic of conversation to something totally unrelated. Anyway, if you wanted to be conservative, you'd love in a nomadic community subsisting on nuts, berries, and whatever small game you were able to trap. Your teeth would fall out by age 40 and you'd likely die shortly thereafter.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,258
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That's incredibly dumb and also you are now shifting the topic of conversation to something totally unrelated. Anyway, if you wanted to be conservative, you'd love in a nomadic community subsisting on nuts, berries, and whatever small game you were able to trap. Your teeth would fall out by age 40 and you'd likely die shortly thereafter.
Knows animals are here for humans to eat
Pick one
That's incredibly dumb and also you are now shifting the topic of conversation to something totally unrelated. Anyway, if you wanted to be conservative, you'd love in a nomadic community subsisting on nuts, berries, and whatever small game you were able to trap. Your teeth would fall out by age 40 and you'd likely die shortly thereafter.
Knows animals are here for humans to eat
Pick one
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,260
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,261
Things Fake anon would sayBilbo !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,263
Autist !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,268
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,277
@OP
> They can have their preferences I suppose. I just think their perception of enlightenment is absurd though.
> First and foremost the reason animals are here is to be eaten.
first you appeal to naturalism then oddly to religion
> They can have their preferences I suppose. I just think their perception of enlightenment is absurd though.
> First and foremost the reason animals are here is to be eaten.
first you appeal to naturalism then oddly to religion
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,280
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,282
tteh !GETFUCKED replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,285
@1,018,263 (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)I used to sell gum and energy drinks in secondary. Could get £20+ a day sometimes, for about £5 worth of shit. The principal put an end to it eventually, but it was fun while it lasted.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,018,288
I bought those packs of Bubble Yum bubble gum that had five pieces for a out a quarter and sold for 25 cents per piece in forth or fifth grade
A A dollar or two was good pocket change for a kid back then
A A dollar or two was good pocket change for a kid back then
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 3 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,856
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,857
Why do people who talk about things being "against nature" only ever apply that to some pet issue and not Burger Kings and highways and talk shows? There need to be more people out there complaining about the corruption of nature by two-for-one pizza deals and text messages.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,859
Probably the most damaging thing that humans have ever done to the planet is agriculture. It's fucked up the natural habitat of every species, including our own.
Vegetarians have a lot to answer for.
Vegetarians have a lot to answer for.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,860
tteh !GETFUCKED replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,875
@previous (J)
They're out there going nuts, man, just eating up all our plants and vegetables. It won't be long before they've grazed the entire planet - our rainforests, farms and plantations left barren. What then?
They're out there going nuts, man, just eating up all our plants and vegetables. It won't be long before they've grazed the entire planet - our rainforests, farms and plantations left barren. What then?
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,886
HOW MANY PLANTS HAD TO DIE FOR THEIR STUPID SALADS!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,902
For every plant that dies there is less oxygen in this world. Our brains require a lot of oxygen to perform at an optimal level. Every vegetarian is a threat to the very existance of our species.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,937
@1,018,216 (Ananthanarayanan M R)> Actually meat consumption has increased way beyond what's "natural".
What was and still is natural. When caveman found a way to take down one of these, it was natural to dine on Dinosaur. Same goes for today.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,943
@previous (N)
Neanderthals never existed alongside dinosaurs, you ignorant old retard.
P.S. Nice Metriacanthosaurus.
Lived: 161.2 million years ago - 155.7 million years ago (Oxfordian)
Neanderthals never existed alongside dinosaurs, you ignorant old retard.
P.S. Nice Metriacanthosaurus.
Lived: 161.2 million years ago - 155.7 million years ago (Oxfordian)
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,945
@previous (L)
I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines. Fact is there are 2.35 Billion Christians and Jews who follow a bible, that tells the story of creation, nor does a single Dinosaur exist.
There4 as an Ex Jew I am free to merge timelines and why you ask? Because it fits the narrative. If 2.35 Billion people can, so can I.
I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines. Fact is there are 2.35 Billion Christians and Jews who follow a bible, that tells the story of creation, nor does a single Dinosaur exist.
There4 as an Ex Jew I am free to merge timelines and why you ask? Because it fits the narrative. If 2.35 Billion people can, so can I.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,947
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,958
@1,019,945 (N)
> I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines. Fact is there are 2.35 Billion Christians and Jews who follow a bible, that tells the story of creation, nor does a single Dinosaur exist.
>
> There4 as an Ex Jew I am free to merge timelines and why you ask? Because it fits the narrative. If 2.35 Billion people can, so can I.
@1,019,937 (N)
> > Actually meat consumption has increased way beyond what's "natural".
>
> What was and still is natural. When caveman found a way to take down one of these, it was natural to dine on Dinosaur. Same goes for today.
retard
> I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines. Fact is there are 2.35 Billion Christians and Jews who follow a bible, that tells the story of creation, nor does a single Dinosaur exist.
>
> There4 as an Ex Jew I am free to merge timelines and why you ask? Because it fits the narrative. If 2.35 Billion people can, so can I.
@1,019,937 (N)
> > Actually meat consumption has increased way beyond what's "natural".
>
> What was and still is natural. When caveman found a way to take down one of these, it was natural to dine on Dinosaur. Same goes for today.
retard
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,967
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,970
@previous (N)
> I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines
you're not supposed to say the r word
> I fully expected some retard to come along and bring up timelines
you're not supposed to say the r word
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,971
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
(terri !RwordOooFE)
Each time you post you have Three 3 三 သုံး Tri
Times
(terri !RwordOooFE)
Each time you post you have Three 3 三 သုံး Tri
Times
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,019,979
Autist !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,133
It's more environmentally friendly to raise cows whom graze on grass than have whole acres of soy crops. Soy is poison.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,139
@previous (Autist !StaYqkzUPc)
Edamame is a wonderful item to eat at a sushi bar. I do not have man boobs or a shrunken package.
Edamame is a wonderful item to eat at a sushi bar. I do not have man boobs or a shrunken package.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,141
I'm quite disappointed actually. I was expecting Father Merrin to have come in with this:
Genesis 9:3
Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,144
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)Wait Wot? Pork and Shrimp and Lobster - Oh wait something about a cloven hoof and external skeleton etc in some other silly bible rule.
Hummmmmmm Contradictions. We need a real Rabbi to explain.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,146
@previous (Anon X-1)
Those prohibitions came later and were (I'm still not entirely sure how this works so don't ask me because I don't know) later overturned by Jesus fulfilling the Old Testament and cancelling the Mosaic Law. But even disregarding that last bit, all meat not prohibited by Leviticus should be okay to eat ?
Those prohibitions came later and were (I'm still not entirely sure how this works so don't ask me because I don't know) later overturned by Jesus fulfilling the Old Testament and cancelling the Mosaic Law. But even disregarding that last bit, all meat not prohibited by Leviticus should be okay to eat ?
Autist !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,147
@1,020,139 (P)
Eating it once in a while won't hurt. It's the people who only drink soy milk and eat tofu who get that.
Eating it once in a while won't hurt. It's the people who only drink soy milk and eat tofu who get that.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,149
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,151
@1,020,146 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The Torah prohibits Jews from eating certain animals (Lev. 11; cf. Deut. 14; Negative Commandments #172-179). We can assume that Jesus would not have violated these commandments. (Otherwise, he would have been condemned by the words of Torah, and would have been a sinner.) Nor would he have taught others to violate the commandments since he himself taught, “Anyone who breaks them [the commandments of Torah] or teaches others to break them will be called ‘light’ [קַל, kal, that is, of no esteem]” (Matt 5:19). In other words, such a disciple could not become or remain part of the “Kingdom of Heaven,” a term that Jesus sometimes used to refer to his band of full-time disciples.
Bible Gateway Leviticus 11 :: NIV. You may eat any animal that has a split hoof completely divided and that chews the cud. ... You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you. "`Of all the creatures living in the water of the seas and the streams, you may eat any that have fins and scales.
he last four words of Mark 7:19, καθαρίζων πάντα τὰ βρώματα (katharidzon panta ta bromata, cleansing all the foods”), have caused many Christians to suppose that Jesus did away with the biblical food prohibitions and declared “clean” (טָהוֹר, tahor) what the Torah declares “unclean” (טָמֵא, tame). The way English versions of the Bible have translated this verse has strengthened the misunderstanding: “Thus he declared all foods clean” (RSV, NRSV and NAB); “In saying this, Jesus declared all foods ‘clean’” (NIV); “By saying this, he showed that every kind of food is acceptable” (NLT); “Thus he pronounced all foods clean” (NJB); “Thus He was making and declaring all foods [ceremonially] clean [that is, abolishing the ceremonial distinctions of the Levitical Law]” (AMP).
In the Torah “clean” and “unclean” are also used of permitted and forbidden food, and therefore, because of this passage, Christians usually have believed that the biblical food laws were abrogated by Jesus. However, one should not be too quick to throw out large portions of the Torah, in this case, portions of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, because of a four-word parenthetical comment by Mark at the end of a long halachic discussion. Such a serious reversal of God’s commands and contradiction of God’s word would need explanation and discussion.
The Torah prohibits Jews from eating certain animals (Lev. 11; cf. Deut. 14; Negative Commandments #172-179). We can assume that Jesus would not have violated these commandments. (Otherwise, he would have been condemned by the words of Torah, and would have been a sinner.) Nor would he have taught others to violate the commandments since he himself taught, “Anyone who breaks them [the commandments of Torah] or teaches others to break them will be called ‘light’ [קַל, kal, that is, of no esteem]” (Matt 5:19). In other words, such a disciple could not become or remain part of the “Kingdom of Heaven,” a term that Jesus sometimes used to refer to his band of full-time disciples.
Bible Gateway Leviticus 11 :: NIV. You may eat any animal that has a split hoof completely divided and that chews the cud. ... You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you. "`Of all the creatures living in the water of the seas and the streams, you may eat any that have fins and scales.
he last four words of Mark 7:19, καθαρίζων πάντα τὰ βρώματα (katharidzon panta ta bromata, cleansing all the foods”), have caused many Christians to suppose that Jesus did away with the biblical food prohibitions and declared “clean” (טָהוֹר, tahor) what the Torah declares “unclean” (טָמֵא, tame). The way English versions of the Bible have translated this verse has strengthened the misunderstanding: “Thus he declared all foods clean” (RSV, NRSV and NAB); “In saying this, Jesus declared all foods ‘clean’” (NIV); “By saying this, he showed that every kind of food is acceptable” (NLT); “Thus he pronounced all foods clean” (NJB); “Thus He was making and declaring all foods [ceremonially] clean [that is, abolishing the ceremonial distinctions of the Levitical Law]” (AMP).
In the Torah “clean” and “unclean” are also used of permitted and forbidden food, and therefore, because of this passage, Christians usually have believed that the biblical food laws were abrogated by Jesus. However, one should not be too quick to throw out large portions of the Torah, in this case, portions of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, because of a four-word parenthetical comment by Mark at the end of a long halachic discussion. Such a serious reversal of God’s commands and contradiction of God’s word would need explanation and discussion.
Autist !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,152
@1,020,149 (L)
Actually, I tried a high soy diet myself when I went vegetarian. I experienced a loss of muscle strength, lack of libido and lower testosterone (I was a lot less angry about everything than I am now). Since I started eating meat again I have regained my prior strength and have an increased libido.
Actually, I tried a high soy diet myself when I went vegetarian. I experienced a loss of muscle strength, lack of libido and lower testosterone (I was a lot less angry about everything than I am now). Since I started eating meat again I have regained my prior strength and have an increased libido.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,154
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,156
This is it ok vs is it not ok is NOT so easy to buy.
The last four words of Mark 7:19, καθαρίζων πάντα τὰ βρώματα (katharidzon panta ta bromata, cleansing all the foods”), have caused many Christians to suppose that Jesus did away with the biblical food prohibitions and declared “clean” (טָהוֹר, tahor) what the Torah declares “unclean” (טָמֵא, tame). The way English versions of the Bible have translated this verse has strengthened the misunderstanding: “Thus he declared all foods clean” (RSV, NRSV and NAB); “In saying this, Jesus declared all foods ‘clean’” (NIV); “By saying this, he showed that every kind of food is acceptable” (NLT); “Thus he pronounced all foods clean” (NJB); “Thus He was making and declaring all foods [ceremonially] clean [that is, abolishing the ceremonial distinctions of the Levitical Law]” (AMP).
In the Torah “clean” and “unclean” are also used of permitted and forbidden food, and therefore, because of this passage, Christians usually have believed that the biblical food laws were abrogated by Jesus. However, one should not be too quick to throw out large portions of the Torah, in this case, portions of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, because of a four-word parenthetical comment[1] by Mark at the end of a long halachic discussion. Such a serious reversal of God’s commands and contradiction of God’s word would need explanation and discussion.
The Torah prohibits Jews from eating certain animals (Lev. 11; cf. Deut. 14; Negative Commandments #172-179). We can assume that Jesus would not have violated these commandments. (Otherwise, he would have been condemned by the words of Torah, and would have been a sinner.)
Nor would he have taught others to violate the commandments since he himself taught, “Anyone who breaks them [the commandments of Torah] or teaches others to break them will be called ‘light’ [קַל, kal, that is, of no esteem]” (Matt 5:19). In other words, such a disciple could not become or remain part of the “Kingdom of Heaven,” a term that Jesus sometimes used to refer to his band of full-time disciples.
In the Torah “clean” and “unclean” are also used of permitted and forbidden food, and therefore, because of this passage, Christians usually have believed that the biblical food laws were abrogated by Jesus. However, one should not be too quick to throw out large portions of the Torah, in this case, portions of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, because of a four-word parenthetical comment[1] by Mark at the end of a long halachic discussion. Such a serious reversal of God’s commands and contradiction of God’s word would need explanation and discussion.
The Torah prohibits Jews from eating certain animals (Lev. 11; cf. Deut. 14; Negative Commandments #172-179). We can assume that Jesus would not have violated these commandments. (Otherwise, he would have been condemned by the words of Torah, and would have been a sinner.)
Nor would he have taught others to violate the commandments since he himself taught, “Anyone who breaks them [the commandments of Torah] or teaches others to break them will be called ‘light’ [קַל, kal, that is, of no esteem]” (Matt 5:19). In other words, such a disciple could not become or remain part of the “Kingdom of Heaven,” a term that Jesus sometimes used to refer to his band of full-time disciples.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,157
Autist !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,159
@previous (L)
Try it for yourself if you love soy that much. Tell us how it goes, I'll eagerly await your results while eating a burger.
Try it for yourself if you love soy that much. Tell us how it goes, I'll eagerly await your results while eating a burger.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,163
@previous (Autist !StaYqkzUPc)
Nice deference. I'll take that as, "I have no evidence, and have a fat nigger cock in my cum-filled throat."
Nice deference. I'll take that as, "I have no evidence, and have a fat nigger cock in my cum-filled throat."
Autist !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,165
@previous (L)
See! You have overweight gentlemen of color cock in your cum filled throat all because you eat soy. Thank you for proving my point!
See! You have overweight gentlemen of color cock in your cum filled throat all because you eat soy. Thank you for proving my point!
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,188
Soy. Not even once.
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 17 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,370
@1,020,152 (Autist !StaYqkzUPc)
> Actually, I tried a high soy diet myself when I went vegetarian. I experienced a loss of muscle strength, lack of libido and lower testosterone (I was a lot less angry about everything than I am now). Since I started eating meat again I have regained my prior strength and have an increased libido.
ｗｔｆ is a soy diet
maybe you should get back on it
edit oh a high soy diet ok
> Actually, I tried a high soy diet myself when I went vegetarian. I experienced a loss of muscle strength, lack of libido and lower testosterone (I was a lot less angry about everything than I am now). Since I started eating meat again I have regained my prior strength and have an increased libido.
ｗｔｆ is a soy diet
maybe you should get back on it
edit oh a high soy diet ok
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,407
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 37 seconds later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,408
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,409
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,410
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,020,412
@previous (E)
It's funny to think that chickens are the closest living relative to Tyrannosaurus Rex.
It's funny to think that chickens are the closest living relative to Tyrannosaurus Rex.