Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Trump supporters are a cult -- from an expert

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #88,879

https://medium.com/s/greatescape/the-trump-cult-73b6a0efd0ee

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,016,007

Remember when your cult leader told you to literally deny reality? https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a22547037/donald-trump-orwellian-truth-reality-eyes-ears/

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,011

> Russia
Oh look, a rehashing of 2 year old lies from which he was exonerated. Come on, you have to do better than that.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,015

@previous (B)
Why do you ignore 99% of the article?

tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,017

Disagree. Cults tend to have competent – albeit psychopathic – leaders.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,019

Trump supporters need to remain a cult. View of who supports Trump including the only poll that is on his side and 100% of those polls have Biden beating Trump.
This is while other people support someone other than Biden on the dems side.

Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,020

@1,016,011 (B)

> exonerated

No he wasn't

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,023

@1,016,015 (A)
> Why do you ignore 99% of the article?
Well, I gave it a good read and found that it was mostly variations on a theme of orange man bad, and the Russia election meddling motif was the centerpiece of the propaganda.

Anonymous B double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,027

@1,016,020 (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
I'm sorry, did Mueller's report conclude, or did it not conclude that Trump did not conspire with Russia to rig his election? Yes or no.

Bilbo !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,030

@previous (B)

It did not conclude that trump did not conspire with Russia to influence his election.

(Edited 27 seconds later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,031

@1,016,027 (B)
Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy, but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,041

@previous (F)
> Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy
I rest my case. Looks like an exoneration from Collusion to me.

> but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction
Irrelevant. If there was no collusion then there was nothing to obstruct.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,051

@previous (B)
LOL! Yes, Detective, I stole potential evidence, but since I did not commit the crime to begin with, you cannot charge me with tampering!

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,054

@previous (A)
Why do you find it so impossible to invoke Occam's Razor and suppose just for one second that the reason he's not behind bars right now is because he's innocent? Why is it more likely that a panel of legal experts bungled the case, or that there's some conspiracy, or that the Russian government has infiltrated the White House, or whatever it is you think?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,055

@previous (B)
He may not have actively colluded with Russia, but he sure as hell did obstruct justice. He even did so on national television. "I fired him because of the Russia thing."

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,058

@previous (A)
> He may not have actively colluded with Russia, but he sure as hell did obstruct justice. He even did so on national television. "I fired him because of the Russia thing."
If there was some bullshit witch hunt going on, in which you were accused of this sort of treason, and you knew you were innocent, would you not also treat the whole thing with the utter contempt it deserves? I would also fire somebody who went behind my back and made my situation worse instead of supporting me.

Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,064

@1,016,015 (A)
tbf it was a pretty shitty article

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,066

@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I didn't read it but I'll agree to be provocative.

Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,126

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It was just some person getting mad about a new York times article

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,132

Looks like Trump wins again!

Autist !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,137

Of course. He loves the poorly educated!

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,016,159

@1,016,015 (A)

> Why do you ignore 99% of the article?

Because that 99% is devastating to his world view.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.