Topic: Why are some people saying I am Matt?
Max !81/EDoqTpE started this discussion 6 years ago #88,665
I clearly am not. Ask the mods. I was in IR chat earlier and watching people talk about some weirdo who posts photoshops of people's dead relatives, hence my comment.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,013,829
Max !81/EDoqTpE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,831
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,835
@previous (Max !81/EDoqTpE)
I happen to be in IRC chat currently. You can return and find a mod to verify your claim.
I happen to be in IRC chat currently. You can return and find a mod to verify your claim.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,914
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,937
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,984
Matt and Max sound pretty similar so I can see why some posters may get confused
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,013,998
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
Do you need a program to stay up with what was going on here?
https://minichan.org/topic/88670#reply_1013985
Do you need a program to stay up with what was going on here?
https://minichan.org/topic/88670#reply_1013985
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,005
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,015
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)Ferengi rule of acquisitions 423.
Read only what you need to read for profit, and disregard that which is not profitable.
Decoder Ring version: Only view and read topics that interest you. Ignore the others.
nog !M5hN5vHirs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,017
Anon X-1 replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,019
@previous (nog !M5hN5vHirs)
You must have the outdated rule book.
# 299 After you've exploited someone, it never hurts to thank them. That way, it's easier to exploit them next time
(The unwritten rule) When no appropriate rule applies, make one up
You must have the outdated rule book.
# 299 After you've exploited someone, it never hurts to thank them. That way, it's easier to exploit them next time
(The unwritten rule) When no appropriate rule applies, make one up
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,021
to serve Mattkind
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,014,022
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
That is one cookbook that the renowned cooking blog fodderglove refuses to review.
That is one cookbook that the renowned cooking blog fodderglove refuses to review.