Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later[^][v]#1,012,671
Do you all think Nike was right or right for backing down?
They were doing the right thing before being attacked by an giant faggot...why did they want to make the choice they made to end up looking like cucks?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,012,677
It's this woke capitalism stuff that makes no sense. Sell the shoe or don't sell the shoe, but do so for business reasons not Twitter backlash. As Michael Jordan is rumored to have said, "Republicans buy shoes too."
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,012,687
I think it was a bitch move to pull the shoes
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,012,703
Spine? Looks like American People Agree with Nike because If you look at when Kaepernick signed on for his MulitiMillion $$ Deal and now with the pull Shoe decision Nike is doing just Fyne.
I do not directly own buy or trade Nike as a Stock because it's not my area of expertise just as I don't with Restaurants. But I do own a huge chuck of several Mutual Funds and each has Nike n McD's and for some odd reason they doing just More than Fyne.
Also Nike is a $110 Billion dollar Market Cap -
News for Stock Market 2Day is Goood - Jobs increased a BUNCH - Yet for some odd reason Bert is not on that Jobs List.
Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,012,705
I love going into the cities and looking at old white men wearing collectible sneakers.
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,713
@1,012,705 (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
They clearly don't have as firm a grasp on it because they just had to recall a relatively bland shoe design because it made people mad.
Bilbo !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,715
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,718
@1,012,713 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
To be frank, I don't really give a damn that shoe or no shoe. I figure Nike No's what it's doing - One hell of a product and have bought many a Nike running shoe but current shoe is not Nike - that said I need a new shoe I really do and it will probably be Nike (but not cause of current publicity)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,725
@previous (Syntax)
When do you plan to show a picture of
those shit stains are drinking out of the toilet?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,728
> Do you all think Nike was right or right for backing down? > They were doing the right thing before being attacked by an giant faggot...why did they want to make the choice they made to end up looking like cucks?
now I don't know what the fuck you are talking about because I don't follow outrage-of-the-day bullshit political sources, but maybe I would have agreed with you, but that opportunity was lost when you pulled out the silly-ass millennial rap lingo "cuck"
That kind of buzzword gets stale fast and has the same wince factor as "patriarchy" and "white privilege" for me. I don't care about the political background of the source -- bullshit buzzwords are bullshit buzzwords and "cuck" is really silly shit. To influence people like me who don't want to join any political team, try using standard professional language (but not that lawyer terminology shit).
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,730
@1,012,718 (Syntax)
Yeah, they definitely know what they're doing in the big picture. This one shoe thing just seems like a small misstep on their part but everyone will forget about it in 3 months anyway.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,742
@1,012,725 (G)
Oh you mean the statement made by US Congresswoman and backed by two other women congress persons about only one source of water - True there is a toilet with a separate drinking water in same open cubicle - Children have no privacy and are forced to pee and poop in the open in front of everyone - Only in the USA are people treated as Jesus wood treat them.
Anyway only one such cubicle was available and the line to the water fountain was broken so that ONLY the Toilet had water available.
So me being able to use computer too LookC if such claims have merit found the only official response WHILE The Inspector General of USA is investigating and IN COURT 2DAY on this subject and is holding ICE and Border Patrol to the Court Rooms Walls in Front of da Judge.
"Former Acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) director Tom Homan told Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom” that the claim was “just ridiculous"
He as the same time could not respond to these -
"US Border Patrol agent assigned to the Deming station has been arrested on child abuse and other charges. The arrest stems from an incident on Saturday, June 27, at a ..."
"Border Agent Arrested For Massive Cache of Child Porn, Hired By Immigrant Shelter To Work With Kids. A Border Patrol agent who was arrested and charged with possession of child pornography was hired by an immigrant shelter and given access to children."
"In one case, a 14-year-old boy, who was 5 feet tall and weighed 120 pounds according to a complaint, was tased by a Border Patrol agent. Children also reported sexual abuse, including a girl who ..."
"The deputy chief of the U.S. Border Patrol's Blaine sector has been charged with three counts of child rape, accused of assaulting a 14-year-old girl who was his foster child. A sickening..."
" A Border Patrol agent in Laredo has been arrested on suspicion of sexually assaulting a woman, tampering with physical evidence and official oppression. Official oppression is when a public ..."
Bert these BPA's are your Heros - With your recent exposure about CP these Men embody all that Man is supposed to be while in the employ of US Gov
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,753
@previous (Syntax)
Again, all of this is hearsay. You have not NOT NOT provided any evidence showing that they have been drinking from the toilet.
Dems have been telling all these stories, but have none NONE NONE factual shred of evidence they make up, just like Russia tampering with the election.
All the other bullshit you typed was irrelevant to my question.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,756
@previous (G)
I'm starting to think that rather than being nuts, you might be a simple liar
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,757
@1,012,753 (G)
I provide Evidence - Even Conviction of BPA for Rape of Child - another for Rape of women agent is supposed to protect and YOU think these agents are in the Arms of Jesus himself as he does this.
How about this
BORDER PATROL KICKED, PUNCHED MIGRANT CHILDREN, THREATENED SOME WITH SEXUAL ABUSE
Migrant children under the care of United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) were beaten, threatened with sexual violence and repeatedly assaulted while in custody between 2009 and 2014. according to a report released Wednesday from International Human Rights Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School.
Based on 30,000 pages of documents obtained through a records request, the report includes gruesome, detailed accusations of physical and mental abuse at the hands of officers. The claims were filed by unaccompanied minors, most of whom hailed from El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico and Honduras. CBP officials are investigating.
Male Border agents were kicking children in the ribs and forcing a 16-year-old girl to "spread her legs" for an aggressive body search. Other children accused officers of punching a child in the head three times, running over a 17-year-old boy and denying medical care to a pregnant teen, who later had a stillbirth.
Mitra Ebadolahi, Litigation Project staff attorney, said the allegations describe a law enforcement system "marked by brutality and lawlessness." The organization also accused Border Protection officials of failing to "meaningfully investigate" the allegations detailed in the public records.
"All human beings deserve to be treated with dignity and respect regardless of their immigration status—and children, in particular, deserve special protection," she said. "The misconduct demonstrated in these records is breathtaking, as is the government's complete failure to hold officials who abuse their power accountable."
In a call with reporters on Wednesday, International Human Rights Clinic said that the allegations, which took place during the presidency of Barack Obama, are especially alarming now that President Donald Trump has vowed to beef up the detentions of undocumented immigrants.
"The fact that these children were already so vulnerable—most traveling alone in hopes of escaping violence and poverty in their home countries—made the unlawful and inhumane actions reflected in the documents even more distressing," Claudia Flores, faculty director of the International Human Rights Clinic at University of Chicago, said in a statement to Newsweek.
Bert I No this gets your juices flowing as you wish you could spread the legs of that 16 year old girl to inspect - Alas you with Dishonorable Discharge from Navy are not eligible - Only Honorable Discharged Border Agents are allowed to spread the legs of such an young girl as representative of Pussy grabbing Trump.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,761
@previous (Syntax) > You have not NOT NOT provided any evidence showing that they have been drinking from the toilet.
> I'm starting to think that rather than being nuts, you might be a simple liar
What am I lying about sir? I asked syntax a simple question, to which he has avoided by giving tl/dr posts that have nothing to do with what I asked.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,764
@previous (G)
Syntax provides you with proof border agents rape children and women under their care and you wine about water.
Is drinking foul water worse than rape?
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,765
> Syntax provides you with proof border agents rape children and women under their care and you wine about water. > Is drinking foul water worse than rape?
My question had to do with the water at the moment. Not the rape or other crimes.
He claimed he has photographic evidence of mexicans drinking toilet water, and I want to see it.
Anonymous G double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,766
@1,012,764 (F)
Unless syntax was referring to mexicans drinking this water...
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 52 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,767
> So there is no proven evidence that mexicans are drinking water
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,807
Whole thing where he gets 'drinking from toilet' is probably where toilet is one big stainless unit which also has a water fountain type deal on top...whole thing one big thing of stainless..
Common in jails an prisons..
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,868
@1,012,757 (Syntax) > Bert I No this gets your juices flowing as you wish you could spread the legs of that 16 year old girl to inspect
Ugh. Nice projection onto an easy target.
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,012,909