Topic: If only we were a .com maybe..
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #88,410
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later[^] [v] #1,011,386
Google's last "diversification"-esque update was terrible. I don't know/care about Minichan (we disabled Google Analytics a long time ago, so we have no analytics), but the impact on some of the other sites I'm involved in running was pretty heavy. The update broadly aimed to do the same thing: ensure no single site appeared "too often" in any one results page (SERP). Intended to help out small(er) sites, it wound up having the opposite effect on overall traffic if your site was highly ranked for certain keywords. It basically penalised success, and promoted junk results.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,389
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> promoted junk results.
But what if we're the junk results that get promoted??
> promoted junk results.
But what if we're the junk results that get promoted??
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,393
@previous (C)
I hope so! I'll stay optimistic. After all, we answer such vital questions as "How do I have sex with my dog?", "How can I cheaply kill myself?", "How many days are there until Christmas?" and so on.
I hope so! I'll stay optimistic. After all, we answer such vital questions as "How do I have sex with my dog?", "How can I cheaply kill myself?", "How many days are there until Christmas?" and so on.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,394
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
But, google will just tell you how many days at the top of your search results. Google is trying to kill https://minichan.org!
But, google will just tell you how many days at the top of your search results. Google is trying to kill https://minichan.org!
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,414
@1,011,393 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Why does google analytics show up as being blocked by noscript and ghostery if it is disabled?
Why does google analytics show up as being blocked by noscript and ghostery if it is disabled?
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,416
@previous (D)
No clue. The only script we use is Cloudflare's. You can check our pages' source to verify. You can also open the Dev Tools/Inspector and visit the Network tab and F5 a page.
Perhaps an extension or some other program is injecting analytics scripts into pages you visit or something along those lines.
No clue. The only script we use is Cloudflare's. You can check our pages' source to verify. You can also open the Dev Tools/Inspector and visit the Network tab and F5 a page.
Perhaps an extension or some other program is injecting analytics scripts into pages you visit or something along those lines.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,420
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Maybe, I believe you, but it doesn't show up on every page. Maybe This is part of Google's plan to kill https://minichan.org .
Maybe, I believe you, but it doesn't show up on every page. Maybe This is part of Google's plan to kill https://minichan.org .
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,501
@1,011,393 (tteh !MemesToDNA)> I hope so! I'll stay optimistic. After all, we answer such vital questions as "How do I have sex with my dog?", "How can I cheaply kill myself?", "How many days are there until Christmas?" and so on.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,503
Google is such a shit company. In China they regulate the internet according to the government, other places they just privately use their algorithm to ignore ideas that aren't in the mainstream or shove them back to an obscure third page or further.
Anyone who thinks the Google search engine is implemented well in it's current iteration is a fool.
Anyone who thinks the Google search engine is implemented well in it's current iteration is a fool.
Also replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,505
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
China blocks CNN
China blocks TC chan
Huge list of what China blocks on the internet.
One MC member had to use a VPN while in China to access MC while recuperating from Foot in Mouse diseases and Hole in Lung.
China blocks CNN
China blocks TC chan
Huge list of what China blocks on the internet.
One MC member had to use a VPN while in China to access MC while recuperating from Foot in Mouse diseases and Hole in Lung.
Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,512
@1,011,503 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> other places they just privately use their algorithm to ignore ideas that aren't in the mainstream or shove them back to an obscure third page or further.
So you mean to say that more popular results come higher in the search rankings than less popular results?
> other places they just privately use their algorithm to ignore ideas that aren't in the mainstream or shove them back to an obscure third page or further.
So you mean to say that more popular results come higher in the search rankings than less popular results?
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,011,683
@1,011,505 (Also)
I'm just calling out their shadow banning policies. China is outright about it
@previous (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
Yes, popularity of a page outranks relevance/factual content.
I'm just calling out their shadow banning policies. China is outright about it
@previous (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
Yes, popularity of a page outranks relevance/factual content.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)