Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,009,902
Does The Board keep records of bans?
Number and frequency of bans would something fun to add to the statistics page!
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,911
@previous (D)
That is a most Excellent Idea
I remember getting a short ban ages ago. I also fully admit to playing release the trigger to get a certain trouble maker banned but it's been over a couple of years since I have done that and why? Because he now does it all on his own without my help.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,927
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,939
Whenever Syntax uses more than 6 UIDs in a thread he should get a ban. When he refers to himself in the third person he should get a ban. Also every time he talks to himself from his multiple UIDs in the third person he should receive an extra hour ban.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,946
@previous (G)
Who is this “Syntax” person you speak of?
Svet !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,951
I like the sound of this game
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,954
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 20 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,969
@1,009,939 (G)
As long as you also can get banned for posting in the same thread under multiple UIDs pretending to be different people, that sounds like something we might consider.
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,970
@1,009,968 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Banned for 1 hour. :)
No, wait, equal enforcement of rules would be antisemitic. Banned for 5 minutes but please think about what you've done.
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,971
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Thank you child. I have donated 1 btc to the JIDF in your honor.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,973
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Fuck off. I was drunk and it was $5 or something at the time. :(
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,009,998
He is that Psychopathic Pedophile who/whom has a problem with people of the net who/whom assist law enforcement as they hunt and track down his acts of pedophilia.
There is more to this explanation of the who/whom he is and chapter and verse, will have to wait until current Supreme court cases are digested.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,057
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,089
Despite probably multiple votes from one user with several UIDS it looks like this is gonna pass. Mods will debate amongst themselves and come to a conclusion thanks.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,095
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You should extend the rule to people accusing posters of being “Lynne”.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,099
@1,010,089 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So you really do want to drive me away? Alright, you win.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,101
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,110
@previous (P)
Nah. The mods are against me and allow all sorts of abuse against me, so what is the point? This is the final straw. They obviously do not want me here. Goodbye. I am joining Green in another place that I will never dare give to you horrible stalkers here.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,115
@previous (O)
Do wish I had a clue who you are. For sure it cannot be the One and Only One - With new Rule it could be danger~rush to even hint and end up with a ban.
Just who/whom stalked you. Have you committed some horrid crime?
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,118
@1,010,099 (O)
Who the hell are you? You aren’t important.
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,120
this is the kind of shit that kills a board. well done.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,122
> Nah. The mods are against me and allow all sorts of abuse against me, so what is the point? This is the final straw. They obviously do not want me here. Goodbye. I am joining Green in another place that I will never dare give to you horrible stalkers here.
Who is this hilariously self-important drama queen?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,125
I don't think that people should be banned for petty things ongs
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 55 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,128
@1,010,122 (Q)
That, indeed, is the question of the century!
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,010,135