Topic: These National Anthem protesters..
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #88,219
Isnt doing some kind of butt ugly act in defiance of respect for when the National Anthem is played...just because you dont like the current President...kind of stupid..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,009,240
They should make them wait in the bathroom until the anthem is over..
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,242
I wish conservatives would get upset about real issues like they used to.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,245
If Trump has his way he will change current anthem to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_FTJc1amQ4
Matches his family's heritage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_FTJc1amQ4
Matches his family's heritage.
wekapipo joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,247
@1,009,242 (B)
> I wish conservatives would get upset about real issues like they used to.
like ignoring AIDS and disenfranchising Gays?
> I wish conservatives would get upset about real issues like they used to.
like ignoring AIDS and disenfranchising Gays?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,252
Sorry if people exercising their constitutional rights makes you feel uncomfortable.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,255
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,256
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,265
@1,009,252 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Sorry if people exercising their constitutional rights makes you feel uncomfortable.
> Sorry if people exercising their constitutional rights makes you feel uncomfortable.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,271
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
We are not talking about Canada where they can now test your blood TWO hours after you get out of a car and charge you with drunk driving if you have over .08 level of alcohol or other drugs in your system.
We are not talking about Canada where they can now test your blood TWO hours after you get out of a car and charge you with drunk driving if you have over .08 level of alcohol or other drugs in your system.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,274
@1,009,265 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Let make this clear.
In your great country...You could drive to the grocery store sober...and then drive home and sit down and start drinking beer..
THEN someone calls the cops and says they saw you weaving all over the road...and the cops can come to your house and make you blow in a breathalyzer and if you blow over the limit they can cuff you and take you to jail on DUI charge..
I think the legislature has been smoke too much legal pot..
Let make this clear.
In your great country...You could drive to the grocery store sober...and then drive home and sit down and start drinking beer..
THEN someone calls the cops and says they saw you weaving all over the road...and the cops can come to your house and make you blow in a breathalyzer and if you blow over the limit they can cuff you and take you to jail on DUI charge..
I think the legislature has been smoke too much legal pot..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,276
@previous (A)
Where is becky when we need a Lawerrrrrrr
I only took two years of law back about the time God started to make the Earth but your analysis is Bogus. IF you're already home there is NO Way cops can do breathalyzer on Ye. Reason is, take bert for instance. Them moment he gets home he is pouring Epic 5 shots down his gullet almost faster than the speed of light AND that is one of multiple Epic 5 shots.
Where is becky when we need a Lawerrrrrrr
I only took two years of law back about the time God started to make the Earth but your analysis is Bogus. IF you're already home there is NO Way cops can do breathalyzer on Ye. Reason is, take bert for instance. Them moment he gets home he is pouring Epic 5 shots down his gullet almost faster than the speed of light AND that is one of multiple Epic 5 shots.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,278
@previous (Syntax)
Take a gander at this..
https://fee.org/articles/canada-s-crazy-new-drunk-driving-law-will-make-you-thankful-for-the-4th-amendment/
Take a gander at this..
https://fee.org/articles/canada-s-crazy-new-drunk-driving-law-will-make-you-thankful-for-the-4th-amendment/
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,280
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,282
@1,009,276 (Syntax)
On consideration I believe the writer of the article took liberties with our imagination about police coming to one's home...but the police are free from considering reasonable suspicion and/or probable cause on testing motorists it would seem..
That's bad law..
On consideration I believe the writer of the article took liberties with our imagination about police coming to one's home...but the police are free from considering reasonable suspicion and/or probable cause on testing motorists it would seem..
That's bad law..
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,283
@1,009,271 (A)
> We are not talking about Canada where they can now test your blood TWO hours after you get out of a car and charge you with drunk driving if you have over .08 level of alcohol or other drugs in your system.
LOL You're right! We weren't talking about that at all. You just started complaining about it out of the blue.
> We are not talking about Canada where they can now test your blood TWO hours after you get out of a car and charge you with drunk driving if you have over .08 level of alcohol or other drugs in your system.
LOL You're right! We weren't talking about that at all. You just started complaining about it out of the blue.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,284
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,287
@previous (A)
Well, I guess it's your thread. Any other off-topic foreign legislation you want to rant about?
Well, I guess it's your thread. Any other off-topic foreign legislation you want to rant about?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,294
@1,009,252 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I think everyone just has wildly different views of what's acceptable. For example, liberals might see not doing the anthem as acceptable. To conservatives like Bert, its grossly unacceptable while racism would be a legitimate, even admirable use of free speech.
I think everyone just has wildly different views of what's acceptable. For example, liberals might see not doing the anthem as acceptable. To conservatives like Bert, its grossly unacceptable while racism would be a legitimate, even admirable use of free speech.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,328
@1,009,274 (A)
> Let make this clear.
> In your great country...You could drive to the grocery store sober...and then drive home and sit down and start drinking beer..
>
> THEN someone calls the cops and says they saw you weaving all over the road...and the cops can come to your house and make you blow in a breathalyzer and if you blow over the limit they can cuff you and take you to jail on DUI charge..
>
>
> I think the legislature has been smoke too much legal pot..
Why do all your examples of a 'free society' always boil down to being able to be drunk?
> Let make this clear.
> In your great country...You could drive to the grocery store sober...and then drive home and sit down and start drinking beer..
>
> THEN someone calls the cops and says they saw you weaving all over the road...and the cops can come to your house and make you blow in a breathalyzer and if you blow over the limit they can cuff you and take you to jail on DUI charge..
>
>
> I think the legislature has been smoke too much legal pot..
Why do all your examples of a 'free society' always boil down to being able to be drunk?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,333
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,337
@1,009,294 (H)
Yeah I get it, I just find it mildly amusing to point out that when conservatives say they value free speech, nine times out of ten what they actually mean is "I want to be a moronic bigot publicly and face no social consequences for my actions.". Which is fine, I guess, but then they get sand in their vaginas when someone wants to shit on the U.S. government, military, etc. like that's somehow different.
Yeah I get it, I just find it mildly amusing to point out that when conservatives say they value free speech, nine times out of ten what they actually mean is "I want to be a moronic bigot publicly and face no social consequences for my actions.". Which is fine, I guess, but then they get sand in their vaginas when someone wants to shit on the U.S. government, military, etc. like that's somehow different.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,358
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Oh ok...so the deranged freaks at a gay pride parade or these tranny rights advocates or the brown savages that blatantly disregard our immigration law and sneak into our country and take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens deserve the same respect as the U.S. military...or our countries system of government which only a fool will claim hasn't made the World a far better place for over two hundred years by what it has done..
I dont agree..
Oh ok...so the deranged freaks at a gay pride parade or these tranny rights advocates or the brown savages that blatantly disregard our immigration law and sneak into our country and take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens deserve the same respect as the U.S. military...or our countries system of government which only a fool will claim hasn't made the World a far better place for over two hundred years by what it has done..
I dont agree..
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,364
@previous (A)
Constitutionally speaking, there is no difference between racist speech and anti-american speech. If you do not like the U.S. constitution you are free to move to another country more your speed. You might prefer Saudi Arabia or Syria.
Constitutionally speaking, there is no difference between racist speech and anti-american speech. If you do not like the U.S. constitution you are free to move to another country more your speed. You might prefer Saudi Arabia or Syria.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,368
@1,009,358 (A)Oh ok...so the deranged freaks at a slavery parade or these puritan rights advocates or the white savages that blatantly disregard our immigration law and sneak into our country and take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens deserve the same respect as our mighty braves...or our countries system of government which only a fool will claim hasn't made the World a far better place for thousands of years by what it has done..
I dont agree..
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,376
@1,009,358 (A)
Bert how much respect do you have for the US Constitution? You said
> Oh ok...so the deranged freaks at a gay pride parade or these tranny rights advocates or the brown savages that blatantly disregard our immigration law and sneak into our country and take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens deserve the same respect as the U.S. military...or our countries system of government
"There is no question that all persons in the United States including unauthorized migrants enjoy the protections of the Constitution". "There is no debate about that among legal scholars."
The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
There have been several court decisions dating back more than a century that outline the rights of undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
Bert how much respect do you have for the US Constitution? You said
> Oh ok...so the deranged freaks at a gay pride parade or these tranny rights advocates or the brown savages that blatantly disregard our immigration law and sneak into our country and take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens deserve the same respect as the U.S. military...or our countries system of government
"There is no question that all persons in the United States including unauthorized migrants enjoy the protections of the Constitution". "There is no debate about that among legal scholars."
The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
There have been several court decisions dating back more than a century that outline the rights of undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,380
@1,009,358 (A)
> ...or the brown savages that take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens
Like 50-year-old work-shy welfare-leeching layabouts you mean?
> ...or the brown savages that take up resources desperately needed by our own citizens
Like 50-year-old work-shy welfare-leeching layabouts you mean?
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,384
@previous (I)
He fully admits they want to work and will work. Stats prove they make more law abiding residents of US than its own citizens. Bert is two faced when it comes to law abiders. He fully admits the only reason he is not in prison for life is just because of pure luck. (There are many dead humans because of Bert)
Bert's fear is that Brown people will continue to make him look even more shiftless and lazy. Plus Brown people will pay income tax (forced withholding) and Bert feels no shame as a tax evader.
He fully admits they want to work and will work. Stats prove they make more law abiding residents of US than its own citizens. Bert is two faced when it comes to law abiders. He fully admits the only reason he is not in prison for life is just because of pure luck. (There are many dead humans because of Bert)
Bert's fear is that Brown people will continue to make him look even more shiftless and lazy. Plus Brown people will pay income tax (forced withholding) and Bert feels no shame as a tax evader.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,393
@previous (Syntax)
> He fully admits the only reason he is not in prison for life is just because of pure luck.
A most ludicrous assessment..
> He fully admits the only reason he is not in prison for life is just because of pure luck.
A most ludicrous assessment..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,397
@1,009,384 (Syntax)
Why do you feel like they should not be deported if they are in the country illegally..
To debate that by talking about any citizen in regards to unlawfulness is ridiculous..
Let's hear you explain why they should not be deported for being here illegally..
Why do you feel like they should not be deported if they are in the country illegally..
To debate that by talking about any citizen in regards to unlawfulness is ridiculous..
Let's hear you explain why they should not be deported for being here illegally..
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,398
@1,009,376 (Syntax)
Not yet..
The insane people of California are going to change their state law to allow illegal immigrants to vote in state elections any day now..
And they should be severely dealt with by the Federal government when they do it..
Not yet..
The insane people of California are going to change their state law to allow illegal immigrants to vote in state elections any day now..
And they should be severely dealt with by the Federal government when they do it..
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,400
@1,009,397 (A)
Are you aware that the very foundation for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights were made by people that were committing an illegal acts of LAW.
Civil disobedience. And you of all people whose relatives were traitors to USA. All of your southern neighbors Traitors to USA.
Of the many advantages of illegals is that they follow a long line of Illegals just as the Founders of USA were Illegals and you cannot Deny such is true. If not for them Illegals like George Washington USA wood not be what it is. We still be drinking Tea instead of Coffee.
Anyway Brown people good you shiftless and lazy bad. They want to work and pay taxes and you not so much. Brown people are law abiding and You not so much.
Are you aware that the very foundation for the US Constitution and Bill of Rights were made by people that were committing an illegal acts of LAW.
Civil disobedience. And you of all people whose relatives were traitors to USA. All of your southern neighbors Traitors to USA.
Of the many advantages of illegals is that they follow a long line of Illegals just as the Founders of USA were Illegals and you cannot Deny such is true. If not for them Illegals like George Washington USA wood not be what it is. We still be drinking Tea instead of Coffee.
Anyway Brown people good you shiftless and lazy bad. They want to work and pay taxes and you not so much. Brown people are law abiding and You not so much.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,418
@previous (Syntax)
Yep...you failed..
All you do is say again and again-
'Well other people break laws sometimes so why punish illegal immigrants when they break the law by entering illegally'..
Totally lame..
Also it is illegal to hire the illegal..
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/penalties-hiring-illegal-workers-65282.html
Go on and make some remark about me not working right now... blah blah..
You arent dumb...if there is a legitimate answer to something regarding law on here I know you will reply with a concise detailed answer with facts to back you up..
But on this subject you just spout goobledeegook..
Yep...you failed..
All you do is say again and again-
'Well other people break laws sometimes so why punish illegal immigrants when they break the law by entering illegally'..
Totally lame..
Also it is illegal to hire the illegal..
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/penalties-hiring-illegal-workers-65282.html
Go on and make some remark about me not working right now... blah blah..
You arent dumb...if there is a legitimate answer to something regarding law on here I know you will reply with a concise detailed answer with facts to back you up..
But on this subject you just spout goobledeegook..
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,424
@previous (A)
So the US Constitution according to you is goobledeegook
"There is no question that all persons in the United States including unauthorized migrants enjoy the protections of the Constitution". "There is no debate about that among legal scholars."
The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
There have been several court decisions dating back more than a century that outline the rights of undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
So the US Constitution according to you is goobledeegook
"There is no question that all persons in the United States including unauthorized migrants enjoy the protections of the Constitution". "There is no debate about that among legal scholars."
The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment protects everyone from deprivation of life, liberty or property without due process of law.
There have been several court decisions dating back more than a century that outline the rights of undocumented immigrants.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Zadvydas vs. Davis (2001) that "once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes, for the due process clause applies to all persons within the United States."
In a Texas case, Plyler vs. Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that non-citizen children must get a free K-12 education.
But undocumented immigrants don’t share all of the rights held by citizens -- for example, they can’t vote in state and national elections.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,425
@previous (C)
AND CANNOT WORK..
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/penalties-hiring-illegal-workers-65282.html
AND CANNOT WORK..
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/penalties-hiring-illegal-workers-65282.html
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,428
@previous (A)
What do you mean by cannot work? You cannot work and do you need a link for that?
They WORK and as you No they pay payroll taxes re deductions.
You who is White and have broken the law your whole life is on high horse about others that break lesser laws. You broke horrid just HORRID Laws most of your life.
They just want to feed children and just what children do you feed? You want to abuse kids and starve them and read about how moms and kids were raped - Fyne Christian you make eh
What do you mean by cannot work? You cannot work and do you need a link for that?
They WORK and as you No they pay payroll taxes re deductions.
You who is White and have broken the law your whole life is on high horse about others that break lesser laws. You broke horrid just HORRID Laws most of your life.
They just want to feed children and just what children do you feed? You want to abuse kids and starve them and read about how moms and kids were raped - Fyne Christian you make eh
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,009,476
@1,009,358 (A)
Seriously consider Fake anon's advice. If not Saudi, then some other country without free speech. If you can just get to like a new government instead of the American one, you'll love it. Abuse of minorities will be tolerated, and criticism of the state won't be. It's perfect for a guy like you.
Seriously consider Fake anon's advice. If not Saudi, then some other country without free speech. If you can just get to like a new government instead of the American one, you'll love it. Abuse of minorities will be tolerated, and criticism of the state won't be. It's perfect for a guy like you.