The Vatican Ladies Football Team were trying to do a good thing by helping out a small Austrian club with their 20 year anniversary. Instead they were faced with hateful and inappropriate insults and abuse. Nevertheless, they set a fine Christian example by turning the other cheek and calmly leaving the event.
For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. - Psalm 139: 13-14
> > > want boys and girls real young. > > > > > I will never stop being grimly aroused by this.
Good of you to confess. Now shoot yourself.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,763
@previous (B)
Weak comeback. You got played, own it and move on.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,766
ITT TGComix has just come home (and hung up his pee-stained opera cape) from another successful night on the prowl, having spied many a smooth, shiny bottom. No spankings were performed this time, though he had a good fap in the bushes.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,768
@1,008,763 (G)
That will never happen. TG always doubles down when he knows he's beaten.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,771
Huh. They managed to scrape together a few female staff plus the wives and daughters of other staff. Good for them I guess.
Also, the "abuse" they suffered was having to see the Vienna team with slogans like "My body My rules" on themselves. Upon seeing the body paint, they decided that they couldn't play soccer with people who disagreed with them and quit the match.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,772
Anonymous J double-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,008,774
> Also, the "abuse" they suffered was having to see the Vienna team with slogans like "My body My rules" on themselves. Upon seeing the body paint, they decided that they couldn't play soccer with people who disagreed with them and quit the match.
They were invited to what they thought would be a simple sports contest to help out the Austrian team only to find themselves being 'shamed' as a publicity stunt. If those exact same slogans had been aimed at a Saudi or Qatari team (because of filthy oil money, the next men's football World Cup will be in that bastion of respect for women's rights, Qatar), this would be a very different kind of story. But hey, it's only the Catholic Church, so let's all be hypocritical and take a safe swing at it.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,008,782
> Well, it didn't take long for the insults to start flying.
Calm down sweetheart, nobody is insulting you. Stop being so hyper-sensitive.
> Really, the most shocking part of this story is that the Vatican has a womens soccer team.
Actually it's the fact that a soccer team was cynically invited to fly to another country to take part in what they thought would be a charity sports event only to be publicly shamed as a publicity stunt. Since you conveniently avoided the scenario, I'll explain it to you: if they had done that exact same thing but to a Muslim team, the reporting on this story would have been very different.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,008,828
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
That is very true
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,008,892
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,008,949
@previous (L)
Hi Doc! Nice of you to out yourself on TC. Keep obsessin' :)
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,008,954
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U) > Everyone is "the Doctor"
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,009,266
@1,008,776 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Lmao why do you think that
The only people who support the saudi or qatari regimes are the rich fucks who make business dealz with them
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,009,339
> The only people who support the saudi or qatari regimes are the rich f*cks who make business dealz with them
Western governments and media organisations, in other words. A not inconsiderably powerful class of entities. Just one day before the American President demanded that Iran stop its 'wicked', 'inhuman', 'barbaric' ways in the Middle East, Trump had this to say when interviewed by Chuck Todd on Meet the Press when asked why he won't ever hold Saudi Arabia to account for their crimes against humanity:
"They buy massive amounts, $150 billion worth of military equipment. Saudi Arabia is a big buyer of American product [note - 'American product' means 'American weapons', which are then used to commit genocide in Yemen]. That means something to me. It's a big producer of jobs [note - he means the military industrial complex]. I'm not like a fool that says we don’t want to do business with them. Take their money. Take their money, Chuck".
"Take their money". Stitch it onto the American flag because it about sums up the ethos of the country. Kill whoever you want in this world, chop up journalists, bomb buses of school children, whatever the hell you want, so long as you're paying America for the right to do it.
It takes an extraordinary confidence that you're addressing a dumbed-down population that you're able to sell your Iran policy as a defence against "human rights abuses" while literally hours earlier saying that Saudi Arabia will never be held to account for their war crimes, genocide and sponsoring of terror groups around the world because you're "taking their money". But I guess when you're the 'Leader of the Free World' and the self-described World's Greatest Democracy, you can get away with that level of shameless hypocrisy.
So anyway, when you say "the only people" who support the Wahhabists are the "rich f*cks", it's those same rich f*cks who control almost every aspect of how the world is governed. And that is why you will see mass hysteria in the Rupert Murdoch-owned media (which takes millions from Saudi Arabia to sanitise their "Reformer" Crown Prince) over the Catholic Church but barely a word about the head-slicing, school bus-bombing, child-executing House of Saud.
tl;dr - you asked why "LMAO why do you think that?" My answer is because it's demonstrably true. George Pell (likely a scumbag to be sure) has received vastly more coverage in the American media than Mohammad bin Salman, who not too long ago ordered the murder and chopping up of a Washington Post journalist (this shortly after his regime killed 40 school children on a bus in Yemen; an act that the US State Department did everything it could to cover up because it was American bombs that killed them*) . But as Trump says, let's all ignore that because they buy lots of weapons off us!
> Cardinal George Pell is loved and protected by the current and past Popes. > >(likely a scumbag to be sure) > > Popes are the pedophile enabling scumbags.
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser"
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,009,538
@1,009,339 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U) > My answer is because it's demonstrably true. George Pell (likely a scumbag to be sure) has received vastly more coverage in the American media than Mohammad bin Salman
That doesn't look demonstrably true. What are you citing?
q replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,009,557
> > My answer is because it's demonstrably true. George Pell (likely a scumbag to be sure) has received vastly more coverage in the American media than Mohammad bin Salman > > That doesn't look demonstrably true. What are you citing?
I'm citing my ability to understand information.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,009,888
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U) > I'm citing my ability to understand information.
So nothing real then.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 14 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,010,065