Topic: Whom would you most like to see Matt beat the shit out of, fora?
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #88,002
Which fora user would you most like to see get slowly flailed and slapped into an unrecognizable bloody pulp by Minichan's premier overweight 50 year old retard?Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,006,619
I'm not willing to admit that Matt is Minichan's premier overweight 50 year old retard, so I'm not sure how to answer.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,620
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,622
@previous (A)
Then you should have included Matt in the pole. He may not have the necessary energy to beat himself up. Then again over the many years he continues to beat himself up. You should see that pic of his medicine cabinet.
Then you should have included Matt in the pole. He may not have the necessary energy to beat himself up. Then again over the many years he continues to beat himself up. You should see that pic of his medicine cabinet.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,625
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,626
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,630
@1,006,625 (D)
No one was paid one penny. May be true an offer was made, but that offer made, the er invited guest angry.
No one was paid one penny. May be true an offer was made, but that offer made, the er invited guest angry.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,631
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,632
I made the top of the list ?
looks like i touched a nerve lol ?????????????????????
looks like i touched a nerve lol ?????????????????????
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,634
@1,006,626 (D)
> 2. Not fat anymore.
Sure any dumb as all fuck fool can go to a dirty nasty Beijing China for Tuberculous for quick weight loss. Then eat dirty nasty street food in Kunming that helps continue to keep weight down because of issues I refuse to post about because that excites Indy. Gives him a woody.
> 2. Not fat anymore.
Sure any dumb as all fuck fool can go to a dirty nasty Beijing China for Tuberculous for quick weight loss. Then eat dirty nasty street food in Kunming that helps continue to keep weight down because of issues I refuse to post about because that excites Indy. Gives him a woody.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 12 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,635
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,637
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,638
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,642
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,647
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,688
I voted "Himself" mostly because I'm picturing Matt reenacting all the Fight Club flashback scenes.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,713
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,716
Bill joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,719
I voted for my son
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,764
Hmmm, Syntax seems to only be using 5 UIDs ITT. Is he trying to cut down?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,900
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,903
Whoever voted for me, I am a pacifist, like Jesus, and would turn the other cheek to any aggression shown to me by Matthew.
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,905
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
But what if he really went for you? The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
But what if he really went for you? The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,906
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,908
@1,006,905 (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> But what if he really went for you? The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
TG doesn't use his fists, he likes sword fighting better.
> But what if he really went for you? The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
TG doesn't use his fists, he likes sword fighting better.
the real indy !k.Ezqeh3HQ replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,913
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,933
@1,006,905 (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
> But what if he really went for you?
As Christ did when beaten by the Romans, I would passively bear the assault.
> The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
Republicans also put out that the "Radical Leftist" tactic of trying to 'bully' and 'silence' people with unpopular opinions doesn't apply when it's their own Republican president pointing to the Lügenpresse at the back of the arena and orchestrating 20,000 of his baying MAGA minions in chants of "down with CNN!" for their crime of disseminating factual information about him. In short, Republicans aren't very bright and their views on Jesus can be discounted.
> But what if he really went for you?
As Christ did when beaten by the Romans, I would passively bear the assault.
> The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
Republicans also put out that the "Radical Leftist" tactic of trying to 'bully' and 'silence' people with unpopular opinions doesn't apply when it's their own Republican president pointing to the Lügenpresse at the back of the arena and orchestrating 20,000 of his baying MAGA minions in chants of "down with CNN!" for their crime of disseminating factual information about him. In short, Republicans aren't very bright and their views on Jesus can be discounted.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,934
Since making my post an hour ago, 2 more people have voted for me! Finally a poll I may win.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,937
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,939
@previous (Q)
> molesting children...paedophile...
You seem to have something on your mind. Is it something you'd like to confess to me? That was such an odd outburst to have in a discussion about politics!
> molesting children...paedophile...
You seem to have something on your mind. Is it something you'd like to confess to me? That was such an odd outburst to have in a discussion about politics!
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,958
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > molesting children...paedophile...
>
> You seem to have something on your mind. Is it something you'd like to confess to me? That was such an odd outburst to have in a discussion about politics!
Yes, he would like for you to stop molesting children.
> > molesting children...paedophile...
>
> You seem to have something on your mind. Is it something you'd like to confess to me? That was such an odd outburst to have in a discussion about politics!
Yes, he would like for you to stop molesting children.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,959
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,963
@1,006,958 (N)
> molesting children.
You also seem to be fixated on this subject. Unburden your sins to me my child.
> molesting children.
You also seem to be fixated on this subject. Unburden your sins to me my child.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,964
@1,006,959 (A)
> Stop posting in my f*cking thread you piece of sh*t.
No :) For 'twas you yourself who mentioned me in it my dear confused child.
> Stop posting in my f*cking thread you piece of sh*t.
No :) For 'twas you yourself who mentioned me in it my dear confused child.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 46 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,965
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,972
@1,006,963 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Unbutton your pants for me my child.
No. I'm too old for you. Plus I'm not gay.
> Unbutton your pants for me my child.
No. I'm too old for you. Plus I'm not gay.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,974
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,975
@1,006,972 (N)
> >Unbutton your pants for me my child.
Looks like I've coaxed a Freudian slip out of you. Thanks for confirming our suspicions.
> >Unbutton your pants for me my child.
Looks like I've coaxed a Freudian slip out of you. Thanks for confirming our suspicions.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,976
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,978
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 17 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,979
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,981
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,982
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,986
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,987
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,989
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,992
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> PEDO
> And he's still going!
YES YOU ARE! NOW STOP STALKING ME.
> PEDO
> And he's still going!
YES YOU ARE! NOW STOP STALKING ME.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,996
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,997
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,998
@1,006,996 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
How come you stopped jacking for Jesus, and progressed to molesting young teens.
How come you stopped jacking for Jesus, and progressed to molesting young teens.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,002
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,044
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,070
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,113
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,114
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,117
@1,007,113 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Just like you still don your opera cape and prance about town, always on the lookout for fresh ladyboy ass to spank?
Just like you still don your opera cape and prance about town, always on the lookout for fresh ladyboy ass to spank?
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,118
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,330
Soooo, to recap. This was my contribution to the thread:
@1,006,933 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
>
> Republicans also put out that the "Radical Leftist" tactic of trying to 'bully' and 'silence' people with unpopular opinions doesn't apply when it's their own Republican president pointing to the Lügenpresse at the back of the arena and orchestrating 20,000 of his baying MAGA minions in chants of "down with CNN!" for their crime of disseminating factual information about him. In short, Republicans aren't very bright and their views on Jesus can be discounted.
A comment about the ongoing political situation in America.
And here is a sample of the reaction:
@1,006,906 (A)
> pedo
@1,006,937 (Q)
> molesting children...paedophile.
@1,006,972 (N)
> Unbutton your pants for me my child.
@1,006,979 (N)
> a young boy.
@1,006,982 (T)
> Fucking young children.
@1,006,987 (N)
> PEDO
@1,006,998 (V)
> molesting young teens.
You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am) I have often thought it would be a fun experiement to invent a priest persona as a way of provoking repressed self-loathing pedophiles into unleashing their fantasies under the guise of projecting them onto someone else. I think it would be fascinating to see what kinds of sick and disgusting posts people write with the safety net of "I'll bet this is what that priest wants to do to kids!"
@1,006,933 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > The Republicans point out that Jesus is pro-gun, so surely he would be okay with some fist fighting if it was necessary?
>
> Republicans also put out that the "Radical Leftist" tactic of trying to 'bully' and 'silence' people with unpopular opinions doesn't apply when it's their own Republican president pointing to the Lügenpresse at the back of the arena and orchestrating 20,000 of his baying MAGA minions in chants of "down with CNN!" for their crime of disseminating factual information about him. In short, Republicans aren't very bright and their views on Jesus can be discounted.
A comment about the ongoing political situation in America.
And here is a sample of the reaction:
@1,006,906 (A)
> pedo
@1,006,937 (Q)
> molesting children...paedophile.
@1,006,972 (N)
> Unbutton your pants for me my child.
@1,006,979 (N)
> a young boy.
@1,006,982 (T)
> Fucking young children.
@1,006,987 (N)
> PEDO
@1,006,998 (V)
> molesting young teens.
You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am) I have often thought it would be a fun experiement to invent a priest persona as a way of provoking repressed self-loathing pedophiles into unleashing their fantasies under the guise of projecting them onto someone else. I think it would be fascinating to see what kinds of sick and disgusting posts people write with the safety net of "I'll bet this is what that priest wants to do to kids!"
Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,338
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)Lawyers helping the public with money from the Catholic Church to pay parents and children, who the Church abused in the name of Jesus.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,365
@previous (Z-1)
> Lawyers helping the public with money from the Catholic Church to pay parents and children, who the Church abused in the name of Jesus.
Did you write this sentence or have you copied it from whatever Mickey Mouse organisation that is? Because it's so tortured it's barely understandable.
> Lawyers helping the public with money from the Catholic Church to pay parents and children, who the Church abused in the name of Jesus.
Did you write this sentence or have you copied it from whatever Mickey Mouse organisation that is? Because it's so tortured it's barely understandable.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,366
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,369
@previous (I)
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, narrow-mindedness and lawyers helping the public with money from the Catholic Church to pay parents and children, who the Church abused in the name of Jesus.
One of his more stream-of-consciousness ideas.
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, narrow-mindedness and lawyers helping the public with money from the Catholic Church to pay parents and children, who the Church abused in the name of Jesus.
One of his more stream-of-consciousness ideas.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,375
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,376
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,388
@1,007,330 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
>
You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
>
You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,391
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,392
@1,007,388 (N)
> >
> You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
>
> Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
Indeed, a fact requires stating only once.
> >
> You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
>
> Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
Indeed, a fact requires stating only once.
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,395
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > >
> > You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
> >
> > Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
>
> Indeed, a fact requires stating only once.
Then why do you keep repeating it if it's a fact?
> > >
> > You know, if I wasn't a real priest (which I am)
> >
> > Repeating this over and over does not mean you are.
>
> Indeed, a fact requires stating only once.
Then why do you keep repeating it if it's a fact?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,397
@previous (N)
1. A fact needs stating only once. For example, saying "I love you" once to your beloved is all that's required to state a fact. This is an axiom.
2. Repeating a fact is often desired. For example, saying "I love you" to your beloved each day. This is life.
Bless you for your question friend!
1. A fact needs stating only once. For example, saying "I love you" once to your beloved is all that's required to state a fact. This is an axiom.
2. Repeating a fact is often desired. For example, saying "I love you" to your beloved each day. This is life.
Bless you for your question friend!
Anonymous X replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,402
@1,007,330 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And here is a sample of the reaction:
> > pedo
lol, a child molester complaining about being called a child molester, winning a contest about whom we'd most like to see beaten up. Priceless.
> And here is a sample of the reaction:
> > pedo
lol, a child molester complaining about being called a child molester, winning a contest about whom we'd most like to see beaten up. Priceless.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,403
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,406
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,419
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,658
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,659
Anonymous Z-3 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,660
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,667
Anonymous Z-4 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,669
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
When he was a mod on scatchan TG-Comix was a champion of grooming young children.
When he was a mod on scatchan TG-Comix was a champion of grooming young children.
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,702
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,720
@1,007,669 (Z-4)
> When he was a mod on scatchan TG-Comix was a champion of grooming young children.
Can you prove this?
> When he was a mod on scatchan TG-Comix was a champion of grooming young children.
Can you prove this?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,721
@1,007,702 (N)
> the retaining champion
'Reigning' you oaf, not "retaining". You retain a championship and you reign as champion.
> the retaining champion
'Reigning' you oaf, not "retaining". You retain a championship and you reign as champion.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,751
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,867
@1,007,667 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
It's something the pedocunts around here need to have said to them more often.
It's something the pedocunts around here need to have said to them more often.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,880
@1,007,658 (A)
> child molesting
@previous (A)
> pedo
I see you're still fixated on this subject. And to think this deluge of kiddie sex obsession was provoked in you by a post about Republican hypocrisy.
> child molesting
@previous (A)
> pedo
I see you're still fixated on this subject. And to think this deluge of kiddie sex obsession was provoked in you by a post about Republican hypocrisy.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,882
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,884
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,893
@previous (A)
It's Friday and A Great Day-Nite for me so Let me add something I heard on NPR yesterday on my way to the Gym - Pope has conviend some kind of conference to take place to consider married men in Brazil, as possible candidates for priests - Don't quote me on those exact words but Church is looking at solving the problem of so few priests and so few trying to become priests.
Church is also losing a mass of people going to church or even joining the church (pardon the pun)
In the news daily is the matter of the Catholic Church and Pedophilia -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catholic-sex-abuse-victims-deserve-justice-theyre-now-getting-more-time-to-seek-it/2019/03/19/7bcb7c96-4a5c-11e9-b79a-961983b7e0cd_story.html
Catholic sex abuse victims deserve justice. They’re now getting more time to seek it.
THE ALL-BUT-IMPREGNABLE wall of power and influence that for decades blocked victims of child sex abuse from seeking justice and compensation from pedophiles and their enablers has started to crumble — not a moment too soon. Stunned by revelations in Pennsylvania and elsewhere documenting the scale of abuse by priests given cover by the Catholic Church, state lawmakers are starting to tear up laws that set strict limits on the number of years that victims are given to bring lawsuits.
Until now, the church, along with insurance companies and a few other private organizations, including the Boy Scouts of America, has had the lobbying muscle to impede such measures, especially in states with sizable populations of practicing Catholics. In New York, for instance, people molested as children by pedophiles had until age 23 to press criminal charges or file civil lawsuits against their abusers. Repeated efforts to loosen that law were blocked by Republicans in the state Senate.
The dam of opposition to reform in Albany broke after Democrats took control of the upper house in last fall’s elections. In January, the church dropped its long-standing opposition to a more open system — allowing criminal charges until childhood victims turn 28 and civil suits until they turn 55 — when lawmakers agreed to apply the new law to public schools, as well as private entities such as the church. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo (D) signed the legislation into law last month.
Fact is that when one mentions Catholic Priest one gets Catholic Pedophile.
It's Friday and A Great Day-Nite for me so Let me add something I heard on NPR yesterday on my way to the Gym - Pope has conviend some kind of conference to take place to consider married men in Brazil, as possible candidates for priests - Don't quote me on those exact words but Church is looking at solving the problem of so few priests and so few trying to become priests.
Church is also losing a mass of people going to church or even joining the church (pardon the pun)
In the news daily is the matter of the Catholic Church and Pedophilia -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catholic-sex-abuse-victims-deserve-justice-theyre-now-getting-more-time-to-seek-it/2019/03/19/7bcb7c96-4a5c-11e9-b79a-961983b7e0cd_story.html
Catholic sex abuse victims deserve justice. They’re now getting more time to seek it.
THE ALL-BUT-IMPREGNABLE wall of power and influence that for decades blocked victims of child sex abuse from seeking justice and compensation from pedophiles and their enablers has started to crumble — not a moment too soon. Stunned by revelations in Pennsylvania and elsewhere documenting the scale of abuse by priests given cover by the Catholic Church, state lawmakers are starting to tear up laws that set strict limits on the number of years that victims are given to bring lawsuits.
Until now, the church, along with insurance companies and a few other private organizations, including the Boy Scouts of America, has had the lobbying muscle to impede such measures, especially in states with sizable populations of practicing Catholics. In New York, for instance, people molested as children by pedophiles had until age 23 to press criminal charges or file civil lawsuits against their abusers. Repeated efforts to loosen that law were blocked by Republicans in the state Senate.
The dam of opposition to reform in Albany broke after Democrats took control of the upper house in last fall’s elections. In January, the church dropped its long-standing opposition to a more open system — allowing criminal charges until childhood victims turn 28 and civil suits until they turn 55 — when lawmakers agreed to apply the new law to public schools, as well as private entities such as the church. Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo (D) signed the legislation into law last month.
Fact is that when one mentions Catholic Priest one gets Catholic Pedophile.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,897
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,901
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
What no comment on
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catholic-sex-abuse-victims-deserve-justice-theyre-now-getting-more-time-to-seek-it/2019/03/19/7bcb7c96-4a5c-11e9-b79a-961983b7e0cd_story.html
What no comment on
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catholic-sex-abuse-victims-deserve-justice-theyre-now-getting-more-time-to-seek-it/2019/03/19/7bcb7c96-4a5c-11e9-b79a-961983b7e0cd_story.html
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,007,928
Phatthew Phosteet Philler joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 years later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,582
Write in: Squeegee.
Anonymous Z-6 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,602
@1,007,901 (Syntax)
Eat shit and die old man!! Well at least eat shit now in hell since you already died.
Eat shit and die old man!! Well at least eat shit now in hell since you already died.
Anonymous Z-7 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,604
spectacles joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 years after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,623
I voted for myself, I'd like to see him try.
👁️👃👁️
₆
✊
👁️👃👁️
₆
✊