Minichan

Topic: Has anyone ever..

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #87,954

Do you feel nervous and uneasy when you see several posts on the front page that are at least 1 day old...and it makes you feel like you need to post right away to make the board more current..

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,005,981

We need more posts on front page that are current news Honest News

Update

FOX News 6/9 - 6/12 1001 RV 3.0 49 39 Biden +10

FOX News 5/11 - 5/14 1001 RV 3.0 Biden 49% Trump 38% Biden +11
FOX News 5/11 - 5/14 1001 RV 3.0 Biden 49% Trump 38% Biden +11
FOX News 5/11 - 5/14 1001 RV 3.0 Biden 49% Trump 38% Biden +11

(Edited 6 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,005,992

@previous (B)
This is awesome..

In 2016 they all said he had 0% chance...and look at how that turned out..

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,005,994

@previous (A)
You seem to be confusing polls and pundits.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,005,997

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
pun·dit
/ˈpəndət/
Learn to pronounce
noun
plural noun: pundits
1.
an expert in a particular subject or field who is frequently called on to give opinions about it to everyone.
synonyms: expert, authority, adviser, member of a think tank, member of a policy unit, specialist, consultant


Ok..


The pundits (experts) said what they said...in 2016..

mordor joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,005,998

Externally hosted image@1,005,994 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
better than being a nigger

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,000

@1,005,994 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I was worried about what the pundit naysayers were saying in 2016 but I'm not falling for it this time...nope..


https://youtu.be/KjmjqlOPd6A

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 56 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,002

@1,005,994 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Bert seems to 4Get that Trump LOST the Nations Popular Vote - Currently he is really really Losing it even more with 40% favorable rating
https://news.gallup.com/interactives/185273/presidential-job-approval-center.aspx

He won the key swing states - Yet a view of them like Penn - Trump cannot be thrilled with how Penn thinks of him currently

Since Trump took office, his net approval in Alabama has decreased by 9 percentage points.
https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump/

Or
Ohio voters disapprove of President Donald Trump by a large margin, poll finds

Just 39 percent of Ohio adults approve of President Donald Trump’s job performance, with almost three times more Ohioans telling Baldwin Wallace University pollsters that they they “strongly disapprove” of Trump’s handling of the presidency than those who said they “strongly approve.”

19 Months to go so Trump of course will find a way to turn this around because IF he loses then He will be arrested and that is something that he does not want based on fact Jail does not serve MC D's food

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,008

@previous (B)
Trump supporters have this bizarre reasoning that because pundits were wrong the polls were wrong. The polls predicted a narrow Clinton popular vote win and Clinton winning swing states narrowly. The polls were off by about 2 percent which is well within the margin of error. This was all a conspiracy by the pollsters to lie about what real American wanted blah blah blah. When polling averages in 2012 had Obama winning the popular vote by less than one percent, but he ended up winning by almost 4, a polling miss of more than three percent, no one saw it as a conspiracy. There is literally no consistency to their beliefs, and zero political memory of anything that happened before 2016.

Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,012

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Of course I have learned my lesson and I mean My Lesson. So now I can pay close attention to the key swing states and make sure I take the margin in error of polls into account. I may not learn my lesson about betting again on the elections but for sure will not open my wallet so wide this time. Me I do want Trump to squirm and based on him firing his own polsters LoL - Fox News must be feeling the heat and fully expect Trump to force them to find a new polling company. They will find it difficult to find one on Trump's side. Of course it's up to Trump to turn Ohio around and up to becky to make sure this does not happen.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,013

@previous (B)
Yeah trump is definitely behind where he was last election but it's too far out for this to be definitve or anything.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,105

@1,006,012 (B)
Do you speak English?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,126

Externally hosted image@previous (E)
Apparently Fake anon has one of these or his level of education does not require one.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,133

@OP
circumspectively...

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,141

What I find amusing about these Trump ratings, is they only poll anywhere between 1000 to 2000 people. And they use that to give his rating? What about the opinions of the millions of other people in this country?

Statistical Analysis II replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,158

@previous (H)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_poll

A 3% margin of error means that if the same procedure is used a large number of times, 95% of the time the true population average will be within the sample estimate plus or minus 3%. The margin of

error can be reduced by using a larger sample, however if a pollster wishes to reduce the margin of error to 1% they would need a sample of around 10,000 people. In practice, pollsters need to balance

the cost of a large sample against the reduction in sampling error and

a sample size of around 500–1,000 is a typical compromise for political polls.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,159

@previous (Statistical Analysis II)
Illegible gibberish.

Statistical Analysis II replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,160

@previous (I)
FOX News 6/9 - 6/12 1001 RV 3.0 Biden 49 Trump 39 Biden +10
Quinnipiac 6/6 - 6/10 1214 RV 3.5 Biden 53 Trump 40 Biden +13

Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 45 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,161

@previous (Statistical Analysis II)
More illegible gibberish.

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,006,892

@1,006,158 (Statistical Analysis II)
Yea, just like the polls said Hillary was going to win in 2016? Give me a fucking break. Your polls don't mean shit.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.