Minichan

Topic: Minecraft vs. Terraria

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #8,775

Which would you vote for in a poll?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Minecraft 11 79%
Terraria 3 21%

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #154,318

I dunno, they both suck so hard

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #154,319

@previous (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
0/10

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #154,320

@154,318 (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)

> I dunno, they both suck so hard

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 15 years ago, 57 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #154,323

@154,319 (A)
Not trolling

anonymous z joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #154,372

@previous (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
You haven't played Terraria.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #154,374

I haven't played Terraria, but it looks like a 2D Minecraft, and that sounds awesome, but I have played Minecraft and I like it.

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,434

@154,372 (anonymous z)
I have, actually.

anonymous z replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,437

@previous (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
brb checking steam

anonymous z double-posted this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,461

@154,434 (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
did you pirate it

vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,466

Considering that I Linux, I will probably never get to play Terraria, but I really want to.

anonymous z replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,473

@previous (vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV)
lrn2wine

vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,476

@previous (anonymous z)
That would imply I didn't try to use wine.

dreamworks replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,479

@previous (vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV)
o h

advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,506

@154,318 (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 54 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,614

Terraria es a fucking shit

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,656

@154,466 (vocalon !!jdS+H4VgV)
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #154,950

@previous (C)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU/Linux_naming_controversy

Proved you wrong.

Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #155,254

@previous (H)
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #155,255

@154,950 (H)
also, tl;dr
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.