Topic: Why is the US such a violent country?
Patriot Pete started this discussion 6 years ago #87,598
So many mass shootings all the time!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,002,421
Fluoride and SSRIs
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,438
because there fags
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,441
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,444
Because freedom and bald eagles
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,448
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,451
@OP> So many mass shootings all the time!
well aint you a good little goy
just so effortlessly believing that it actually happened and whatever else the (((media))) and other jews say
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,452
Full of rwords.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,454
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,455
Anonymous G double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,456
Anonymous G triple-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,458
@1,002,454 (I)"All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First: It Is Ridiculed, Second: It Is Violently Opposed, And Third: It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" – Arthur Schopenhauer
mordor quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,469
Big Oil Lobbying for a Carbon Tax- The Green of Money Big Oil has NEVER been opposed to the carbon control agenda
I will repeat this statement of fact... Big Oil has NEVER been opposed to the carbon control agenda. They were always going to profit from the agenda through higher energy prices. Getting more for less. Therefore they were not in opposition
Covered this in 2015- 4 years ago
• Beware of carbon tax ‘love fest’- Big Oil and the UN partner up- Be careful what you wish for...
• Europes Top Oil Producers Call for Carbon Pricing- Completely Unsurprising
• Big Oil: Bring on the Carbon Tax- Poseurs Pembina & Desmog blog
2013
• Where the Anthropogenic Global Warming Cult meets the Military Industrial Complex
As was stated way back:
"The oil companies have NOT had an epiphany of any sort. This is a sales PR campaign. We're all supposed to sing Kumbaya now with big oil because they have seen the light. That's not what happened! Big Oil always saw the light on the Carbon agenda. They saw the money light. The cash called them. Your cash. Your money. The big oil vacuum is getting ready to suck up your money, your choice and your freedoms- With their partners in crime, of course!
• The Green Agenda- Total Control of your life
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,470
it definitely isn't related to the ease of access to firearms they have over there
mordor replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,483
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,489
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,495
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I understand why poverty increases certain crimes, but not why it increases other crimes
I understand why poverty increases certain crimes, but not why it increases other crimes
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,499
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,505
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,523
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,533
The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,655
Because of the democraps.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,660
Ananthanarayanan M R double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,661
@1,002,533 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
It says 67% of rapes were done by whites
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
It says 67% of rapes were done by whites
Ananthanarayanan M R triple-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,662
> White individuals were arrested more often for violent crimes than individuals of any other race and accounted for 59.0 percent of those arrests.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,761
@1,002,661 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I just looked at the percentages and at 12% of the population, they are over represented in every crime
I just looked at the percentages and at 12% of the population, they are over represented in every crime
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,763
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,770
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,772
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,783
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
By 5% in the example of rape. And you should also bear in mind these are statistics about arrests, which obviously doesn't cover nearly all crime. You can't conclude (with certainty) from this source that black people commit more crime, just that they get arrested more.
By 5% in the example of rape. And you should also bear in mind these are statistics about arrests, which obviously doesn't cover nearly all crime. You can't conclude (with certainty) from this source that black people commit more crime, just that they get arrested more.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,785
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I'm looking at it and black people commit 29% of rape for 12% of population.
Also if the stats don't count for anything, why even discuss it?
I'm looking at it and black people commit 29% of rape for 12% of population.
Also if the stats don't count for anything, why even discuss it?
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,786
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I'm looking at it and black people commit 29% of rape for 12% of population.
Oh yeah I calculated that wrong in my head because I forgot they have people who arent white or black in America! I don't know why they are overrepresented there. There's probably been research into it.
> Also if the stats don't count for anything, why even discuss it?
dude why do you always think I am implying things when I am not. I'm stating facts. I never said the statistics "don't count for anything". Do you not know what bear in mind means?
> I'm looking at it and black people commit 29% of rape for 12% of population.
Oh yeah I calculated that wrong in my head because I forgot they have people who arent white or black in America! I don't know why they are overrepresented there. There's probably been research into it.
> Also if the stats don't count for anything, why even discuss it?
dude why do you always think I am implying things when I am not. I'm stating facts. I never said the statistics "don't count for anything". Do you not know what bear in mind means?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,791
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
Sorry for assuming anything. It just makes things hard to discuss when the stars aren't seen as being accurate
Sorry for assuming anything. It just makes things hard to discuss when the stars aren't seen as being accurate
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 38 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,793
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Sorry for assuming anything. It just makes things hard to discuss when you're discussing things with a racist
> Sorry for assuming anything. It just makes things hard to discuss when you're discussing things with a racist
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,794
@1,002,791 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Where did I say anything about the statistics is inaccurate?? I said they were arrest stats, not stats of all criminal activity because those obviously dont exist.
To draw the conclusions you're drawing you would have to make the assumption that arrests are 100% representative of total crime committed. I don't know if there are any decent estimations of unsolved/unknown criminal activity, but I feel like it would be a pretty significant number
Where did I say anything about the statistics is inaccurate?? I said they were arrest stats, not stats of all criminal activity because those obviously dont exist.
To draw the conclusions you're drawing you would have to make the assumption that arrests are 100% representative of total crime committed. I don't know if there are any decent estimations of unsolved/unknown criminal activity, but I feel like it would be a pretty significant number
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
Ananthanarayanan M R double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,795
Inaccuracies besides the ones they have in their footnotes.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,796
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,810
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,814
also tbf any white woman can say she got raped and the police will just pick some random black guy of the street
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,819
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I don't think that's true anymore. Even if it were true, that doesn't account for the rest of the crime disparity
I don't think that's true anymore. Even if it were true, that doesn't account for the rest of the crime disparity
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,832
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
*arrest disparity
and i thought you already agreed that crime for monetary gain stems from poverty, not what colour your skin is
*arrest disparity
and i thought you already agreed that crime for monetary gain stems from poverty, not what colour your skin is
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,893
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
I don't think that murder can necessarily be covered by poverty and most of the people raped by black guys are black women
I don't think that murder can necessarily be covered by poverty and most of the people raped by black guys are black women
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,904
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I don't think that murder can necessarily be covered by poverty
you think it's more likely to be an inherent effect of having dark skin colour?
> and most of the people raped by black guys are black women
i dont see what that has to do with anything
> I don't think that murder can necessarily be covered by poverty
you think it's more likely to be an inherent effect of having dark skin colour?
> and most of the people raped by black guys are black women
i dont see what that has to do with anything
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,907
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
Because you said that a lot of the black rape arrests come from white women lying about being raped by black guys, which is a bizarre statement in my opinion.
I do not know the reason for the arrest disparity
Because you said that a lot of the black rape arrests come from white women lying about being raped by black guys, which is a bizarre statement in my opinion.
I do not know the reason for the arrest disparity
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,914
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,919
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,957
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,960
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,971
Anyway you haven't really given any reasons why anyone should think it's skin colour that's the root cause of this issue
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,972
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,975
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I assumed you shared Mordors view on this since it's what you've been trying to defend, right?
I assumed you shared Mordors view on this since it's what you've been trying to defend, right?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,989
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
When have I defended that. I think a lot of it is do to culture created by a fucked up history
When have I defended that. I think a lot of it is do to culture created by a fucked up history