Topic: KOOK
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #87,559
WATCH TUMBBAD
kook joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,001,980
fuck no
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,981
kook replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,984
So? I have a right to change my mind.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,985
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,988
I will try it after Black Mirror. I am not gaurenteeing anything
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,991
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Ooh, new Black Mirror. Thanks for jogging my memory! I shall, in fact, watch that now.
Ooh, new Black Mirror. Thanks for jogging my memory! I shall, in fact, watch that now.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,001
I'm in the first 30 seconds and I'm 75% sure that this movie is going to piss me off
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,006
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's how I felt at the start of The Conjuring, I started it with high hopes, then was quickly yelling at the TV.
That's how I felt at the start of The Conjuring, I started it with high hopes, then was quickly yelling at the TV.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,011
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,014
@1,002,006 (G)
I had previously thought that I had seen The Conjuring, but now I think it might have been Sinister or Insidious
I had previously thought that I had seen The Conjuring, but now I think it might have been Sinister or Insidious
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,015
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 24 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,016
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 4 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,017
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,020
Oh God, why didn't they trim his nose hair?
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 27 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,021
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,022
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,023
... Is this a zombie movie?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,024
The kids are acting the hell out of this. I wonder if they got beat for forgetting lines
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,025
Matt this can't be India's Gone With the Wind. I refuse to believe that
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC quintuple-posted this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,031
Lead character shows up and he looks like if Freddy Mercury and Borat had a baby, but Indian. Even has a handlebar mustache
What replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,033
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,044
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,053
Matt, this movie is fucking dogshit
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,056
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,057
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,063
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It is about a freak show, where the dude running it uses chemicals to turn people into freaks. It's a pretty good comedy, from the early 90's, and is chalk full of 90's movie troups. Keanu Reaves is even in it, along with Bobcat Golthwaite, and a few other 90's celebrities. Worth a watch I'd say. It's a rare movie, and the DVD is like 50 bucks on it's own. Luckily, it exists in it's entirety on youtube.
It is about a freak show, where the dude running it uses chemicals to turn people into freaks. It's a pretty good comedy, from the early 90's, and is chalk full of 90's movie troups. Keanu Reaves is even in it, along with Bobcat Golthwaite, and a few other 90's celebrities. Worth a watch I'd say. It's a rare movie, and the DVD is like 50 bucks on it's own. Luckily, it exists in it's entirety on youtube.
(Edited 53 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,064
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,066
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 19 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,067
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,069
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I really did not. I cannot fathom how you do not like this film. The scenery is beautiful, the acting is good, and it is a deep story about human greed. What specifically do you not like about it?
I really did not. I cannot fathom how you do not like this film. The scenery is beautiful, the acting is good, and it is a deep story about human greed. What specifically do you not like about it?
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 double-posted this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,070
@1,002,067 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
https://www.mid-day.com/articles/double-celebration-for-sohum-shah-starrer-tumbbad/20044161
https://www.mid-day.com/articles/double-celebration-for-sohum-shah-starrer-tumbbad/20044161
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 triple-posted this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,071
@1,002,067 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
"Hailed as one of the most visually stunning films, Tumbbad has received immense appreciation from critics as well as the audience, the testimony of the same has been its steady run at the box office. Tumbbad clocked 50 successful days at the box office and is running strong at the theatres continuing to win the hearts of the audience. Emerging as a sleeper hit, Tumbbad has carved a place as one of the finest pieces of cinema."
"Hailed as one of the most visually stunning films, Tumbbad has received immense appreciation from critics as well as the audience, the testimony of the same has been its steady run at the box office. Tumbbad clocked 50 successful days at the box office and is running strong at the theatres continuing to win the hearts of the audience. Emerging as a sleeper hit, Tumbbad has carved a place as one of the finest pieces of cinema."
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,072
@1,002,069 (Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7)
All of it seemed cheesy to me. I don't believe that anyone would hold it in high regard if it were from a country that has good production values
All of it seemed cheesy to me. I don't believe that anyone would hold it in high regard if it were from a country that has good production values
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,073
I also think that the cgi was bad
Snake Plissken ? joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,078
@1,002,072 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
indian movies look moderately expensive but in poor taste
like tyler Perry movies
indian movies look moderately expensive but in poor taste
like tyler Perry movies
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,080
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,082
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,085
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,090
@1,002,066 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Oh, also, Mr.T as the bearded lady.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Tuesday it is.
Oh, also, Mr.T as the bearded lady.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Tuesday it is.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,091
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,092
Matt I wasn't trying to be mean at all in this thread. I love you
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 48 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,109
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I know. I just cannot fathom how you do not see the beauty of that film!
I know. I just cannot fathom how you do not see the beauty of that film!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,121
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,130
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,139
@previous (Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7)
To me, it looked very cheesy. And the main guy was Almost like a parody
To me, it looked very cheesy. And the main guy was Almost like a parody
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,147
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
He is a parody yes. Maybe you are just not familiar with Indian magical reality genre of films. In this genre, people stand for ideas or traits. In this movie, he represents greed as a quality of man. He is not to be taken as a character so much as a trait or idea. He is exaggerated because of this: he is supposed to represent true greed in mankind. How far did you get in the film? Maybe you should watch it all to get it.
He is a parody yes. Maybe you are just not familiar with Indian magical reality genre of films. In this genre, people stand for ideas or traits. In this movie, he represents greed as a quality of man. He is not to be taken as a character so much as a trait or idea. He is exaggerated because of this: he is supposed to represent true greed in mankind. How far did you get in the film? Maybe you should watch it all to get it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,152
@previous (Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7)
I got to an hour and 17 minutes
But no I am not familiar with Hindu magical films
I got to an hour and 17 minutes
But no I am not familiar with Hindu magical films
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,163
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Please just finish it. Please! Then we can have deep discussions about the themes!
Please just finish it. Please! Then we can have deep discussions about the themes!
Dr. Brand, MD, M.Sc. joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,166
Dr. Brand, MD, M.Sc. double-posted this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,167
why am i watching tumbbad
Dr. Brand, MD, M.Sc. triple-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,169
ugh wow a lame gandhi quote
Sharice Turnipseed !!NWcpYoiU7 replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,176
Dr. Brand, MD, M.Sc. replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,196
that sucked matt
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,239
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,002,241
@1,002,196 (Dr. Brand, MD, M.Sc.)
It's much better in the 2nd watch. If you still don't like it, it's much better in the 3rs watch etc.
It's much better in the 2nd watch. If you still don't like it, it's much better in the 3rs watch etc.