Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^][v]#1,001,609
Libs committing TREASON.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,610
If Iran wants to be an "Islamic Republic" (whatever that means) that's really none of our business. We should neither sanction nor subsidize it. It's their deal.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,615
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Look at the video lard for brains.
The Dems advised Iran with inside information so that Iran could advance their interests against the U.S. under the Trump administration.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,616
OP receives his information from Sean Hannity and 'Judge' Jeanine Pirro.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 9 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,617
@1,001,615 (A)
How is that even possible? I thought Trump was supposed to be tough on Iran?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,623
One America News Network (OANN), also referred to as One America News (OAN), is an American extreme right-wing pay television news channel. The network is headquartered in San Diego, California and shares office space with Tom Metzger, a former Klu Klux Klan gang leader.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,629
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,001,645
@1,001,615 (A)
One America News Network (OANN), also referred to as One America News (OAN), is an American extreme right-wing pay television news channel. The network is headquartered in San Diego, California and shares office space with Tom Metzger, a former Klu Klux Klan gang leader.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,001,652
@1,001,615 (A)
Do you stretch before making reaches like that? @previous (F)
Are you trying to tell me that this isn't a reliable source of information? Damn, I'm shocked.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,001,655
> 2019 > Getting your "news" from YouTube videos
ishygddt
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,001,656
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,703
I never click on your links but I did this time.
One America News exposed John Kerry's illegal shadow diplomacy with Zarif last year, when the two were caught holding secret meetings together in Paris, when photos were taken of them.
How is it a secret meeting if they are shown shaking hands and smiling for cameras??? If it was secret they wouldn't hold it in a room with reporters you dingus.
In some cases, Obama officials reportedly attended Capitol Hill meetings to learn information about new U.S. policies from Congressional Democrats, and then relay that information to Congressional Democrats, and then relayed that information to the Iranian government."
"This is of course in violation of the Logan Act, the same act that General Flynn was spied upon after Trump had been elected"
First of all that's not even a complete thought or sentence. Secondly, what they did seems to be attend a meeting on the hill, many of which are open to the public (and more importantly have food!), and talk about that briefing with the Iranian government, which even if all this is true, probably isn't a chargeable offense (even Flynn who they mentioned earlier was never charged with violating the Logan Act, likely because it's unconstitutional).
Anyway let me quote from the Daily Beast article this "news" segment is failing to summarize because OAN is full of hacks and Jack Posobiec is just barely smart enough to remember to breathe regularly.
As the Trump administration sent warplanes and an aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, a small group of former Obama administration officials reached out to their contacts in the Iranian government, including Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. Their message to Iran: Don’t take Trump’s bait. Stay calm.
Literally the first sentence of the article. The nefarious thing Obama officials are trying to do? Prevent Iran from escalating into war with the U.S. HOW AWFUL. We have a God-given right to nuke Iran.
Meanwhile, lawmakers on Capitol Hill pressed for details about the threat, at times turning to former Obama officials for answers.
Three Obama officials who worked closely on the Iran nuclear deal, one of whom is still in touch with Iranian government officials, traveled to Capitol Hill to brief congressional Democrats about the situation. Those former officials said would not say if they passed information from Iranian government officials to members of Congress. Rather, they said they focused on educating members about their experience working with Iranian leaders and how Tehran reacts to economic pressure.
Wait what? Jack Posobiec said Obama officials were going to Congress to learn secret policy information and relay that to the Iranian Government. Which, since Congress has virtually no ability to engage in foreign diplomacy, would be kind of improbable. What actually happened is Obama officials told Congressional Democrats what their contacts in the Iranian government were thinking, and how they thought Trump's foreign policy was affecting Iran and US/Iran policies. So Jack Posobiec got it exactly ass backwards. As usual.
This news segment is so grossly wrong and misleading I wouldn't even consider it fake news. It is like saying I gave birth to my mother. It's just literally the opposite of what happened.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,704
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > It is like saying I gave birth to my mother. It's just literally the opposite of what happened.
Worthy of:
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,754
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,806
@1,001,754 (A)
If there illegible you might want to get your eyes checked out, or maybe just read the daily beast article for yourself instead of having the incompetent "journalists" at OAN tell you exactly what to think and feel.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,807
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,808
@1,001,806 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,811
@previous (A)
Ok but what did you think of the original Daily Beast reporting?
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,815
@1,001,808 (A)
Good job. You really got him with that one.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,817
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx)
Liberals are stupid mindless snowflakes who result to insults rather than argue intelligently like conservatives, thanks.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,845
@1,001,811 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
All beast did and you did also was examine the facts and try to offer some alternative explanation of what motives were. Supposition conjecture and wild imagination.
The facts remain.
Snake Plissken ? joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,886
the Obama administration huh
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,112
@1,001,845 (A)
OAN did no additional journalism for this story. This 3 minute clip is their attempt to summarize the daily beast report. They misrepresented what it said entirely. That's either because they are genuinely incompetent and don't know how to read a basic news story, or because they are lying to you. Either way you should stop watching them.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,127
This is the report they are referencing. You can read it, then watch the video, and tell me if OAN accurately summarized its contents.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,245
@1,002,229 (P)
I never got these attacks. So what if Schumer is gay and Obama is gay and Michele is a man and the kids are adopted etc. etc. It would be weird but there's no wrongdoing there. Maybe I'm just too libtarded to understand.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,246
Gays and trans people are the new boogeyman, better hide the kids.
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,267
@1,002,229 (P)
This image is concentrated stupidity, but I enjoy its implications. It implies a scenario where Fake anon has become important enough to debate Trump directly, and has cornered the Preisdent so badly that he must resort to childish insults.
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,282
@1,002,244 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The Beast repost which was published after the OAN video reads like it is damage control in response to the issues the OAN video raised!
So....clearly, the OAN report may or may not have been made 'in response' to the Beast report as you claim in an effort to make it sound merely like a reply to the Beast piece and having no substance..
BUT the allegations of impropriety by the Democrats had obviously been raised as the Beast report tries to spin their version of the event that the OAN is
First and foremost...
> Team Obama Tells Iran: Don’t Escalate, Don’t Take Trump’s Bait
WHAT THE FUCK??!
What goddamn business do factions of our government have entering into clandestine diplomatic shenanigans with a country that is openly hostile to The United States of America...in direct opposition to the Presidents stated objectives and intended policy??
That right there is absolutely REPREHENSIBLE and if you dont agree then something is wrong with you.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,332
@previous (P) > The Beast repost which was published after the OAN video reads like it is damage control in response to the issues the OAN video raised!
The OAN video was posted on June 5, 2019. The Daily Beast article was posted on May 31, 2019. Do you know how months work? May comes before June. Even on this basic fact which you had absolutely zero possibility of getting wrong because the dates are RIGHT THERE on the page, you are just inarguably wrong. Please stop embarrassing yourself. > What goddamn business do factions of our government have entering into clandestine diplomatic shenanigans with a country that is openly hostile to The United States of America...in direct opposition to the Presidents stated objectives and intended policy??
If the president's policy is to provoke another country into war, then you should 100% oppose that with every fiber of your being because it's a fundamentally unjustifiable position.
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,345
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Sorry I meant the dates the other way around. It was a simple goof I did look at them.
Irrelevant anyways as to the real point.@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
As to your second reply:
But not to the extent of treason. I wish youd grow the fuck up.
Anonymous P double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,346
Anonymous P triple-posted this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,002,347
@1,002,332 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
And that's just the thing...the Beast article was first and they were already defending the dem players against being in violation of the Logan Act and describing the actions of the criminal dem's actions in a way different than others had already claimed.
So the OAN piece didnt come up with the dems being out of line because of the Beast piece...that had already happened before the Beast piece.
Beast was all about damage control and you know it. And they used zero facts in that damage control to recite that the dems were crooked....only opinion.