"Pell is expected to be in court on Wednesday when his barrister, Bret Walker SC, tries to persuade a panel of appeal judges to overturn his conviction on three grounds, including that the guilty verdict was "unsafe," because the evidence could not have convinced a jury beyond reasonable doubt.
The other grounds are that Judge Kidd did not allow Pell's lawyers to show a "moving" video during summing-up, which they say would have detailed their version of events, and that Pell was not given the chance to enter a not guilty plea in front of the jury, as legally required"
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,467
@1,001,463 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Your hard drive full of child abuse footage that you masturbate to, you subhuman piece of filth. Then shortly afterward, your long history of child grooming and sexual abuse will come to light and you'll be put safely behind bars with Bubba, where you belong.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,472
@previous (G)
One can only hope for. The Church spends 10's of Billions of dollars to cover up priest abuse of babies-children. Merrin prays for hours on end for protection, so he can continue to mess with children.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,474
@previous (K)
The truly pathetic thing is that he isn't even a priest. It's just a shtick he uses because kiddiefucking priests who get off the hook are like rockstars to him.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,524
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 14 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,529
@1,001,524 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Sharing any evidence here could compromise any law enforcement investigation that might be ongoing. Sorry, pedofilth.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,531
Not really, they're claiming there was suppressed evidence which proves the alleged assaults couldn't have happened. We'll have to wait and see.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,556
@1,001,472 (K)
They really do spend a mind-bubbling amount of money each year as a result of legal claims against predatory clergy. The USCCB Report is a fascinating read.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,557
@1,001,555 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Yes but they are making that claim after he has been convicted instead of during the trial so
The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg replied with this 6 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,916
@1,001,556 (L)
How ironic. You post that, and TG becomes silent.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,918
@previous (The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg)
He is busy ripping out the rectum of a child.
The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,926