Dead !Pool..v42s started this discussion 6 years ago#87,477
I feel like he used the word "doxxed" without meeting the requirements of being "doxxed" and having it actually mean something. In MY opinion, if you use your real name and are a member of the media or press, your personal info is bound to be discovered and shared.
Whom do you assume I'm talking about? More than one person can be obsessed with "Syntax", whoever that is.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,082
Please explain for those of us whom do not know what you are talking about.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,001,096
@OP
Do you think there was targeted harassment of him that was encouraged by a shitty vlogger?
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,769
@1,001,076 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
He got a bunch of messages saying "debate Steve crowder" screenshotting themwithout blurring the phone numbers btw made a big deal about it on Twitter.
@1,001,082 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Editor for vox has a video segment that has been constantly responded to by Steven crowder the "_ is ____; prove me wrong" guy, and in those, along with mostly idiological commentary and fact contesting, also pokes fun of the guy who is a proud self proclaimed queerfor being gay
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,770
@1,001,096 (G)
And no, I don't believe crowder ever encouraged harassment of the editor
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,785
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,814
@1,001,769 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Ok so a gay guy is getting bullied online and YouTube doesn't care. I guess it's an issue now because it's pride month? Idk, this doesn't seem abnormal by internet standards but maybe being on the *chans has desensitized me.
Snake Plissken ? joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,891
> He got a bunch of messages saying "debate Steve crowder" screenshotting themwithout blurring the phone numbers btw made a big deal about it on Twitter. > > > Editor for vox has a video segment that has been constantly responded to by Steven crowder the "_ is ____; prove me wrong" guy, and in those, along with mostly idiological commentary and fact contesting, also pokes fun of the guy who is a proud self proclaimed queerfor being gay
what? i couldn't read this for beans
I guess I just won't care
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,892
@1,001,769 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
He screenshot them and posted them without blurring the numbers? He "doxed" himself?
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,001,930
@1,001,814 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
No, youyube DOES CARE. They demonetized all of Crowder's videos at the same time they demonetized hate speech videos and and things like that.
It's not that the vox editor is being made fun of, it's not that the vox editor is attacking crowder, it's the fact that YouTube is making moves against political ways of thinking that don't fall into the narrative that liberal media is pushing.
YouTube uses to be the place where it didn't matter if you were one person or 100, the content of your videos could be shared with the world. Now apparently YouTube is a queer space and gay folk can't be disagreed with.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
He "doxxed" the numbers that texted him.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,944
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
So someone sent him a text and he posted the number publicly? That is fucked up if they weren't threats
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,951
@1,001,930 (Dead !Pool..v42s) > that YouTube is making moves against political ways of thinking that don't fall into the narrative that liberal media is pushing.
*wank wank* This is some seriously boneheaded shit.
Sometimes businesses respond to protect their reputation when enough of their consumers complain. They're doing damage control, not pushing a narrative. They've been through the same shit with ISIS videos and pedo videos and Alex Jones.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,954
@1,001,944 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Call your mother, hon.
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,956
@1,001,944 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
All they said were "debate steven crowder" afaik
@1,001,951 (I)
Ok, let's keep pretending that Alex Jones and pedo videos are in the same category as calling someone a lispy queer while presenting factual opposition to their videos.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,960
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Yeah that is fucked up
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,963
@1,001,930 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
You do, obviously. You're here whining about a private company taking steps to protect its brand.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,964
Crowder is a fag with a soyvoice
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,965
@1,001,956 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
LOL His "gay Mexican" is from Cuban roots. He didn't even do enough research to get the country right.
Boo-hoo. Some edgelord can't make money calling people names on YouTube anymore because Google wants to convince people it's finally going to start being respectable. Big fucking deal. Tell him to go put his shit up on Vimeo or 88Edgetube or some other site that wants traffic. Stop pretending like this is the end of the world.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,967
> It's not that the vox editor is being made fun of, it's not that the vox editor is attacking crowder, it's the fact that YouTube is making moves against political ways of thinking that don't fall into the narrative that liberal media is pushing.
bullshit. if you bothered to check a wider variety of political talkers, you'd find that demonetization is widespread and has had people scrambling and brainstorming other ways of getting income, all over the map. Youtube is simply pussying out because they hate losing advertisers who in turn are scared to have their ads on controversial little-guy (non big established company) videos.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,973
Liberals: YouTube is a private company and can do whatever they want!
Also liberals: This company should be forced to bake a cake for fags!
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,987
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,992
@1,001,930 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Calling people a "lispy queer" and selling t-shirts that say "socialism is for fags" is a political opinion? Seems more like being an asshole to me than politics. @1,001,944 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Idk if you text a taunt to a journalist you kind of can't expect them to keep that secret.
(Edited 1 hour later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,997
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
A private company is infringing my freeze peach, help me you socialist faggots!
tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,001,998
Also, for a crowd that likes to call everybody "snowflakes", they really are the biggest gaggle of crybabies and whingers around.
Maybe they should make an alternative video-sharing platform. A space where they can be safe to call people faggots and niggers.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,036
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,039
@1,001,963 (G)
Are you ignorant? I was mocking the hashtag "#wadeiscancled" which had no relevance to this thread
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,045
@1,001,992 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well it said socialism is for figs.
And those two things make up a minor percentage of the content in said videos, the meat and potatoes of them are debunking claims made by the vox guy as facts.
Btw, anyone pro gay rights that also defends che Guevara, should do a little research on his opinion of the gay population.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,046
> Liberals: YouTube is a private company and can do whatever they want! > > Also liberals: This company should be forced to bake a cake for fags!
try to think in terms of, what would minimize the jerkfuck factor in a given situation
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,089
I bet Che was a giant queer, in the bushes with sweaty swarthy motherfuckers
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,093
@1,002,088 (Sheila LaBoof)
Can private companies do what they want, or not?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,095
@previous (O)
Well companies are not sentient beings of course, so you mean can the people who direct the company do what they want to do in general? Or all the time in any circumstance? I would think there some societal safeguards, depending on jurisdiction and who has the power there.
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,097
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Can companies decide they don't like you, and refuse to do business with you?
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,098
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,099
@1,002,045 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Yeah defending che is dumb. If the insults are a small part of it then he could probably cut that out and be fine. Idk what YouTube's policy is, and it seems like they don't either.
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,100
@1,002,098 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
In what circumstances?
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,101
@previous (O)
Depends on location but here a business is not allowed to discriminate based on religion, race, sex, and sexuality
Ananthanarayanan M R double-posted this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,102
Also crippledness
Ananthanarayanan M R triple-posted this 6 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,103
Oh and political views
Ananthanarayanan M R quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,104
Oh or on any grounds whatsoever
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,106
you also can't just squeeze people's tits at the register
god damn nanny state
Dead !Pool..v42s (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,136
@1,002,099 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They've actually been very cautious with what counts as far as terms of service, and things that had previously been manually reviewed and accepted have all been approved.
I've never wanted to defend a right leaning person before, it makes me feel weird
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,160
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Aren't you always complaining about how taxes are too high and there shouldn't be laws
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,174
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
Complaining like that is now hate speech, and you can be deplatformed and silenced if some fag doesn't like what you say.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,189
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,211
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
Do you have autism?
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,226
@previous (O)
Do you ever say things with a basis in reality?
Denzel Peterson joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,227
@1,002,189 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
That's exactly what just happened.
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,233
It's not about maza being harassed, it's about not letting anyone hear what crowder has to say.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,240
@1,002,227 (Denzel Peterson)
am i missing something? steve crowder is still on youtube
Anonymous Q replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,286
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
But they demonized his platform. That was thousands of dollars and yet he did not violate their TOS.
Hmmmmmmm
Of course it is said he has an outstanding lawyer that has already successfully dealt with other issues RE; attacks against his rights...so hopefully there yet may still be a better outcome to his problems.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,291
He doesn't have a right to have his videos monetised.
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,359
@1,002,286 (Q)
they demonetise pretty much everyone's videos though. was it manually done?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,365
I watched boogie2988's comment video and I get the impression that Crowder was practically stalking the gay Vox article writer, like an obsession, posting videos about about him being some stupid fag all the time.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,375
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
No, the vox guy posts stupid shit and pretty much every commentator debunks everything he posts.
This latest one is how conservatives are controlling the media. It's so stupid everyone laughed and made fun of him. That's why he cried about it and got Crowder defunded.
It's a common left wing tactic, to censor and ban wrong think.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,384
@previous (L)
no, you got that all wrong there, champ
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,390
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Did you watch the vox guys vid, and Crowders rebuttal?
Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,002,418