Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Have you heard about The Sexxxtons?

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #87,414

Actual mother daughter combo deciding to do porn together.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,000,444

Yuck - both unattractive.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,454

fake and homosexual

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,467

They never actually fuck or interact at all besides sharing a dick though.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,471

Externally hosted image@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well now that would be committing a felony on camera.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,473

@previous (A)
I can't get off to non-felonious porn anymore!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,478

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
*simulated felonious porn

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,481

@1,000,471 (A)
Not an attorney - I did minor in the law years ago. Becky could be a great source for this question.

Can a mother and daughter act on camera and engage in on screen sex with each other and not break any laws?

Odd thing about the law. A prostitute can give sex away. If prostitute charges one dollar for the sex, that is a crime except where it's legal. If the same prostitute takes a job as an actress and is paid to have sex on screen then that is 100% legal - Exceptions for countries like Japan where private parts have to be pixelated.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,488

@previous (E)


Punishment
Incest between adults is a felony, punishable by five years’ to life imprisonment, depending on state law. Incest against children is punished just as severely, if not more so, as other cases of child sexual abuse, usually by lengthy prison terms or life in prison. In some states, people convicted of sex crimes may also be committed to mental hospitals if they pose a danger to others.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,500

@previous (A)
Getting back to your topic. IF the mother and daughter work as actresses, what they do on screen is legal. Again we do need an attorney like becky to weigh in on this. Given in the USA the supreme court has made porn totally legal, no state law can (excuse the term) Trump federal laws. Actors are protected under USA law. Just because it's mom and daughter is just incidental or is that Incestidental.

(Edited 51 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,535

@previous (E)
So maybe they could do a movie about robbing a bank where they actually rob a bank and not be prosecuted according to your logic.

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,536

@1,000,467 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
@1,000,473 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Fuck off retard get off my tripcode

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,538

@1,000,500 (E)
Or or or more better would they be doing anything illegal if the daughter was 14 years old?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,540

@1,000,536 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
WHat was wrong with those? They were very witty. You should have just quietly them be associated with you.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,541

@previous (G)
I don't like being imfursonated.

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,543

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It could actually be very advantageous. You are known as a dangerous man here, with many enemies. If there were multiple Fake anons around, you enemies would have no idea who to attack.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.