Topic: Checkmate atheists
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #87,392
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later[^] [v] #1,000,118
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 59 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,119
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,120
How can anyone possibly debate memes? Clever OP! I'm none of those crazy atheists were expecting that.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,125
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,140
And they say the right can't meme.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,145
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,158
lol this guyAnonymous F double-posted this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,159
Anonymous F triple-posted this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,160
Anonymous F quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,161
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,188
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 38 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,193
@1,000,140 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well, this topic has proven them wrong. Seeing these witty image macros turned me from a godless liberal into a conservative Christian. God bless!
Well, this topic has proven them wrong. Seeing these witty image macros turned me from a godless liberal into a conservative Christian. God bless!
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,196
@1,000,140 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
This reminds me of that time last year when the parties switched again.
This reminds me of that time last year when the parties switched again.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,210
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 6 years ago, 12 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,211
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,216
@OP
This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,219
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,220
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,221
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 10 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,222
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,224
@1,000,221 (C)
> It's only slander if it isn't true.
And it's only projection when it applies to the speaker.
> It's only slander if it isn't true.
And it's only projection when it applies to the speaker.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,228
@1,000,222 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> If God exists why did She allow anime to be created?
Because God granted us free will.
That's another funny thing about my atheist friends. They scream and wail about God being a "dictator" who "forces us to live a certain way"...and then they complain that he doesn't place limits on human actions and behavior!
> If God exists why did She allow anime to be created?
Because God granted us free will.
That's another funny thing about my atheist friends. They scream and wail about God being a "dictator" who "forces us to live a certain way"...and then they complain that he doesn't place limits on human actions and behavior!
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,232
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,234
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,237
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
It is impossible to prove a negative. There's plenty of proof that you're a toddler-chasing sickfuck though, TG.
It is impossible to prove a negative. There's plenty of proof that you're a toddler-chasing sickfuck though, TG.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,258
@previous (C)
> It is impossible to prove a negative.
"There is no water in this glass" is a negative statement. It is also a provable one. You're not very bright are you?
> There's plenty of proof that you're a toddler-chasing sickfuck though, TG.
Then by all means post such "proof".
> It is impossible to prove a negative.
"There is no water in this glass" is a negative statement. It is also a provable one. You're not very bright are you?
> There's plenty of proof that you're a toddler-chasing sickfuck though, TG.
Then by all means post such "proof".
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,262
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I could post it, but I don't want to risk compromising any investigations that may or may not be ongoing.
I could post it, but I don't want to risk compromising any investigations that may or may not be ongoing.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,264
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,266
A timely reminder:
@1,000,216 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
@1,000,216 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,283
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,286
Killer Lettuce? !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,287
So in this hypothetical game of religion chess, who is the atheist king piece that's been checkmated? Is it Dawkins? Would checkmating the atheists mean holding a gun to Dawknis' head?
What would an equivalent checkmate of Christianity be? Taking the Pope hostage?
What would an equivalent checkmate of Christianity be? Taking the Pope hostage?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,290
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,513
@1,000,216 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)> This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
The first image cracked you up?
Images off
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,524
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,552
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,588
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You didn't have to say anything. OP didn't make any comment in the first one, but yet, you claim the first one is what cracked you up.
Must suck to be caught in your own lies TGPedoFilth.
You didn't have to say anything. OP didn't make any comment in the first one, but yet, you claim the first one is what cracked you up.
Must suck to be caught in your own lies TGPedoFilth.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,747
@previous (G)
> You didn't have to say anything.
Precisely.
> OP didn't make any comment in the first one
You're starting to get it.
> you claim the first one is what cracked you up.
And it did. The OP was a completely blank message (I have images turned off) which I took to be his clever and sardonic comment on atheists' debating skills when asked to present facts.
Bless you, friend!
> You didn't have to say anything.
Precisely.
> OP didn't make any comment in the first one
You're starting to get it.
> you claim the first one is what cracked you up.
And it did. The OP was a completely blank message (I have images turned off) which I took to be his clever and sardonic comment on atheists' debating skills when asked to present facts.
Bless you, friend!
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,021
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You're full of shit pedo... Your comment reflected on exactly what the image portrayed. Better luck next time.
@1,000,216 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
You're full of shit pedo... Your comment reflected on exactly what the image portrayed. Better luck next time.
@1,000,216 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> This first one is what cracks me up the most about my poor atheist brethren. They demand "facts" and "proof" from religious people, yet when pressed to provide such things for their own positions, resort to evasive ad hominem attacks.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,001,034
@previous (G)
> Your comment reflected on exactly what the post portrayed.
Indeed it did. A completely empty space. Bless you friend!
> Your comment reflected on exactly what the post portrayed.
Indeed it did. A completely empty space. Bless you friend!