Topic: Another day, another US mass shooting in Virginia, 11 dead
It Is MAAM !Z/cf3vSlNE started this discussion 6 years ago #87,274
But remember, it is 100%, totally unrelated to guns.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #999,093
Thoughts and prayers.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #999,101
@OPenis
Why do you want to take people's rights away?
Why do you want to take people's rights away?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #999,104
Guns don't kill people.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,144
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,147
But remember, it is 100%, totally unrelated to subpar mental health care.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,148
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,152
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,156
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,192
no, 12!Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,205
luckily, it was all a dream
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,206
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,208
@previous (D)
Usually by shooting bullets at them, but feel free to put one in your mouth and test it.
Usually by shooting bullets at them, but feel free to put one in your mouth and test it.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,210
I think that, instead of making weak excuses like blaming video games or mental health, American conservatives need to have some courage. The courage to say that they think that regular mass shootings are an acceptable trade-off for guns.
It's become pretty clear that this is what they think. If they just came out and said it, it would bring much more honesty to this debate.
It's become pretty clear that this is what they think. If they just came out and said it, it would bring much more honesty to this debate.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,215
@previous (L)
Do you think if we named an alcoholic beverage after the mass shooting trend that it would have a cooling effect?
Like instead of an irish car bomb we could drink some mangled students or a bloody classmate.
Do you think if we named an alcoholic beverage after the mass shooting trend that it would have a cooling effect?
Like instead of an irish car bomb we could drink some mangled students or a bloody classmate.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,217
As long as theres millions of abortions a year a few thousand gun deaths are irrelevant.
Tell you what, you can take away 50,000 guns for every 500,000 abortions you stop each year. How's that?
Tell you what, you can take away 50,000 guns for every 500,000 abortions you stop each year. How's that?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,220
@999,208 (K)
But the gun cann't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
But the gun cann't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,223
@999,206 (D)
> How, praytell, does a gun kill someone?
use your head, genous
how does poisoned drink kill someone
when it goies in you, there's damage
> How, praytell, does a gun kill someone?
use your head, genous
how does poisoned drink kill someone
when it goies in you, there's damage
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,226
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,227
@999,217 (G)
When performed in a safe environment by qualified medical professionals, abortion is actually one of the safest medical procedures available.
When performed in a safe environment by qualified medical professionals, abortion is actually one of the safest medical procedures available.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,250
@previous (C)
@previous (C)
> When performed in a safe environment by qualified medical professionals, abortion is actually one of the safest ways of stopping a beating heart available.
ftfy
@previous (C)
> When performed in a safe environment by qualified medical professionals, abortion is actually one of the safest ways of stopping a beating heart available.
ftfy
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,282
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,291
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,297
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,314
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,321
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
But you still haven't answered my question about how the gun killed someone.
@999,220 (D)
> But the gun can't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
>
> How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
You should learn to comprehend sentences before you speak so you don't look foolish, "genous".
But you still haven't answered my question about how the gun killed someone.
@999,220 (D)
> But the gun can't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
>
> How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
You should learn to comprehend sentences before you speak so you don't look foolish, "genous".
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,332
@previous (D)
> But you still haven't answered my question about how the gun killed someone.
>
>
>
> > But the gun can't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
> >
> > How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
>
> You should learn to comprehend sentences before you speak so you don't look foolish, "genous".
do you know anything about the flow of time and cause and effect
> But you still haven't answered my question about how the gun killed someone.
>
>
>
> > But the gun can't load a bullet into it's chamber. Nor can it aim itself at an object. Nor can it pull it's trigger.
> >
> > How does it kill people if it can't do those things?
>
> You should learn to comprehend sentences before you speak so you don't look foolish, "genous".
do you know anything about the flow of time and cause and effect
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,333
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,352
@999,297 (C)
No, you're being ignorant of the heartbest thats being referenced. The point of an abortion, but is to remove the viability of a fetus. If that fetus has a heartbeat, the doctor stops it during an abortive process.
No, you're being ignorant of the heartbest thats being referenced. The point of an abortion, but is to remove the viability of a fetus. If that fetus has a heartbeat, the doctor stops it during an abortive process.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 48 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,375
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,378
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,391
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #999,409
@999,332 (Sheila LaBoof)
Come on Laboof... Out of everyone here, I thought you would be one to catch my point. My point is.... The gun didn't kill the people, the person killed the people, using the gun. Without the person, the gun is useless. Just like Bert's mom, the gun just lays there.
@previous (K)
> urine idiot
> urine
Says the idiot.
Come on Laboof... Out of everyone here, I thought you would be one to catch my point. My point is.... The gun didn't kill the people, the person killed the people, using the gun. Without the person, the gun is useless. Just like Bert's mom, the gun just lays there.
@previous (K)
> urine idiot
> urine
Says the idiot.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,449
@999,352 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
It still doesn't harm the patient, and is therefore a perfectly safe procedure. Thanks.
It still doesn't harm the patient, and is therefore a perfectly safe procedure. Thanks.
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,461
@previous (C)
I didn't mention anything about the patient, or about the safety of said procedure, just pointing out the heartbeat being stopped, since you were apparently unaware that abortion is the safest way to stop a heartbeat of a fetus by a professional. I don't have any opinions on the matter, but yours seem to be helping your ignorance?
Not all abortions stop a heartbeat, I'm sure many are performed before the cluster of cells forms an organ that resembles a beating heart.
But some abortion procedures specifically stop the heartbeat of the fetus, not the "patient" the woman carrying the fetus and having the procedure done.
And I feel like you may not have had an abortion before? My friend told me it was a pretty rough experience, physically and mentally, so if you'd like to dance around with definitions of words, define harm to exclude physical and emotional effects on a person.
I didn't mention anything about the patient, or about the safety of said procedure, just pointing out the heartbeat being stopped, since you were apparently unaware that abortion is the safest way to stop a heartbeat of a fetus by a professional. I don't have any opinions on the matter, but yours seem to be helping your ignorance?
Not all abortions stop a heartbeat, I'm sure many are performed before the cluster of cells forms an organ that resembles a beating heart.
But some abortion procedures specifically stop the heartbeat of the fetus, not the "patient" the woman carrying the fetus and having the procedure done.
And I feel like you may not have had an abortion before? My friend told me it was a pretty rough experience, physically and mentally, so if you'd like to dance around with definitions of words, define harm to exclude physical and emotional effects on a person.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,466
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,467
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,559
@999,409 (D)
> Come on Laboof... Out of everyone here, I thought you would be one to catch my point. My point is.... The gun didn't kill the people, the person killed the people, using the gun. Without the person, the gun is useless. Just like Bert's mom, the gun just lays there.
>
>
>
> > urine idiot
>
> >urine
>
> Says the idiot.
I think you've heard that bullshit so many times that you think it doesn't make you sound retarded
no fucking kidding that guns need to be aimed and fired, christ
> Come on Laboof... Out of everyone here, I thought you would be one to catch my point. My point is.... The gun didn't kill the people, the person killed the people, using the gun. Without the person, the gun is useless. Just like Bert's mom, the gun just lays there.
>
>
>
> > urine idiot
>
> >urine
>
> Says the idiot.
I think you've heard that bullshit so many times that you think it doesn't make you sound retarded
no fucking kidding that guns need to be aimed and fired, christ
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,636
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Yes. The gun needs to be aimed and fired. But it doesn't do it by itself, therefore the gun was used by a human to commit the crime, not the gun by itself.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Yes. The gun needs to be aimed and fired. But it doesn't do it by itself, therefore the gun was used by a human to commit the crime, not the gun by itself.
Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,644
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,645
@previous (C)
I don't think you really do understand Shiela's motivation. Because I guarantee that it isn't "take away people's rights".
I don't think you really do understand Shiela's motivation. Because I guarantee that it isn't "take away people's rights".
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,647
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,698
It was a black guy with a handgun, not a white guy in a maga hat with a scary black rifle. I'm pretty sure this will be gone from the media in a day because it doesn't fit the narrative
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,702
@previous (O)
It wouldn't be gone from your media. /pol/ would be salivating over that.
It wouldn't be gone from your media. /pol/ would be salivating over that.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,704
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,709
@999,698 (O)
> I'm pretty sure this will be gone from the media in a day because it doesn't fit the narrative
Im pretty sure itll be gone from the media in a day because mass shootings are such a commonplace occurrence that they're barely news to begin with and there'll probably be another one to take its news spot by that time
> I'm pretty sure this will be gone from the media in a day because it doesn't fit the narrative
Im pretty sure itll be gone from the media in a day because mass shootings are such a commonplace occurrence that they're barely news to begin with and there'll probably be another one to take its news spot by that time
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,711
@999,698 (O)
Black guys pull a lot of multiple person shootings, but we don't tend to call them mass shootings for some reason
Black guys pull a lot of multiple person shootings, but we don't tend to call them mass shootings for some reason
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,712
@999,709 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Black guy with a handgun shoots people isn't news worthy. You can't freak out over military assault handguns and push an agenda so the media will drop it. Yes, another black guy with a handgun will shoot someone tomorrow. As long as it's blacks shooting blacks it's ignored.
Black guy with a handgun shoots people isn't news worthy. You can't freak out over military assault handguns and push an agenda so the media will drop it. Yes, another black guy with a handgun will shoot someone tomorrow. As long as it's blacks shooting blacks it's ignored.
Anonymous O double-posted this 6 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,715
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,716
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,717
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,720
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The victims only matter if they are Muslims, or Jews, or gays, minorities etc. Then there can be a media circus for a couple of days. It's bonus points if the shooter wears a maga hat, so Trump can be blamed.
wHy WoN't SoMeBoDy ThInK oF tHe ChIlDrEn!?!?
The victims only matter if they are Muslims, or Jews, or gays, minorities etc. Then there can be a media circus for a couple of days. It's bonus points if the shooter wears a maga hat, so Trump can be blamed.
wHy WoN't SoMeBoDy ThInK oF tHe ChIlDrEn!?!?
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,721
You can always trust Minichan for cutting edge social commentary.
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,725
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
If a drunk driver crashes into and kills a sober driver, the best thing to do is remove all cars from sober drivers so it doesn't happen again. This is how gun control works.
If a drunk driver crashes into and kills a sober driver, the best thing to do is remove all cars from sober drivers so it doesn't happen again. This is how gun control works.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,732
@previous (O)Finally, I can use this image Meowth created almost a decade ago. I am so happy.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
wade replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,737
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,765
@999,721 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
If you don't get your opinions on American racial politics from a guy who lives in New Zealand and has never even seen a black American IRL, and a biofemale who talks about "island blacks" and "jungle asians", you are simply retarded. THanks.
If you don't get your opinions on American racial politics from a guy who lives in New Zealand and has never even seen a black American IRL, and a biofemale who talks about "island blacks" and "jungle asians", you are simply retarded. THanks.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,779
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,781
@999,712 (O)
> Black guy with a handgun shoots people isn't news worthy. You can't freak out over military assault handguns and push an agenda so the media will drop it. Yes, another black guy with a handgun will shoot someone tomorrow. As long as it's blacks shooting blacks it's ignored.
now you sound like Al Sharpton
> Black guy with a handgun shoots people isn't news worthy. You can't freak out over military assault handguns and push an agenda so the media will drop it. Yes, another black guy with a handgun will shoot someone tomorrow. As long as it's blacks shooting blacks it's ignored.
now you sound like Al Sharpton
Sheila LaBoof triple-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,782
@999,711 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Black guys pull a lot of multiple person shootings, but we don't tend to call them mass shootings for some reason
what was the most recent multiple fatality shooting by a black
> Black guys pull a lot of multiple person shootings, but we don't tend to call them mass shootings for some reason
what was the most recent multiple fatality shooting by a black
Sheila LaBoof quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,783
@999,636 (D)
> Yes. The gun needs to be aimed and fired. But it doesn't do it by itself, therefore the gun was used by a human to commit the crime, not the gun by itself.
>
> Why is this so hard for you to understand?
I don't know why you think it is difficult for people to understand how guns work
your argument is fatuous
> Yes. The gun needs to be aimed and fired. But it doesn't do it by itself, therefore the gun was used by a human to commit the crime, not the gun by itself.
>
> Why is this so hard for you to understand?
I don't know why you think it is difficult for people to understand how guns work
your argument is fatuous
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #999,841
@999,782 (Sheila LaBoof)
Does two people count? Here is more victims recently https://www.google.com/amp/s/chicago.suntimes.com/platform/amp/2019/4/16/18419248/aurora-warehouse-shooting-victims-shot-multiple-times-from-a-distance
Does two people count? Here is more victims recently https://www.google.com/amp/s/chicago.suntimes.com/platform/amp/2019/4/16/18419248/aurora-warehouse-shooting-victims-shot-multiple-times-from-a-distance
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,103
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Does two people count? Here is more victims recently https://www.google.com/amp/s/chicago.suntimes.com/platform/amp/2019/4/16/18419248/aurora-warehouse-shooting-victims-shot-multiple-times-from-a-distance
well no, two people is generally not considered a multiple fatality event, as it is far too commonplace, as when discovering your wife in the sack with the iceman
OK, that link cites an event from February of 2019, though no race information that I noticed -- usually they don't bother with race information in any case unless it was part of the motivation or speculated motivation on the part of speculators before prosecution has notes public
> Does two people count? Here is more victims recently https://www.google.com/amp/s/chicago.suntimes.com/platform/amp/2019/4/16/18419248/aurora-warehouse-shooting-victims-shot-multiple-times-from-a-distance
well no, two people is generally not considered a multiple fatality event, as it is far too commonplace, as when discovering your wife in the sack with the iceman
OK, that link cites an event from February of 2019, though no race information that I noticed -- usually they don't bother with race information in any case unless it was part of the motivation or speculated motivation on the part of speculators before prosecution has notes public
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,183
@999,783 (Sheila LaBoof)
But yet, you still blame the gun, instead of the shooter.
Never imagined you to be so retarded.
But yet, you still blame the gun, instead of the shooter.
Never imagined you to be so retarded.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,000,480
@previous (D)
> But yet, you still blame the gun, instead of the shooter.
>
> Never imagined you to be so retarded.
you are being obtuse, and that does not reflect well upon you. you are dishonest in your manner.
> But yet, you still blame the gun, instead of the shooter.
>
> Never imagined you to be so retarded.
you are being obtuse, and that does not reflect well upon you. you are dishonest in your manner.