Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#993,716
I think that Jeffrey Dahmer was a pretty big loser and almost a gay incel. He killed people when they tried to leave and that is a faggot ass thing to do, even if he wasn't fucking guys.
Also any serial killer who would put up a rec room in his house to lure in children are such creepy losers. Like Dean Corrll
Another loser, Gary Heidnick. He had a shit ton of money but kept black hookers captive in dire conditions,because women wouldn't stop aborting his unborn babies. That is pretty embarrassing
I had never heard of Heidnik. Before reading this my top loser was either Isreal Keyes or Mark Twitchell. I may have to reconsider at this point. I really don't consider Dahmer for this position, as he was trying to hide his homosexuality at a time it was widely forbade. Thank you for sharing, Kook!
Keyes was trying hard to be some kind of dark, tortured soul, who just wanted attention. Yet, he claimed he wanted no attention. Twitchell was a widely unsuccessful film maker, who just tried to live his cosplay fantasy in real life. However, was quickly caught, due to his vanity. Neither of those traits are very appealing to me.
He constantly says he did not want attention, but then just openly shared his crimes with police upon capture. I know he said he wanted the death penalty as quickly as possible, but only two states had the death pemalty at this point, and Alaska was not one of them.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#993,738
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
But a house is a couple thousand, even if I get land for free and build it myself. Plus, not best place to live for a type 1 diabetic.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^][v]#1,176,248
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
But are there any that do not do that? Or do so minimally? Surely if you think there are some that you think are the biggest losers, there are some on the opposite end of that spectrum, whatever it may be?
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^][v]#1,176,252
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I feel like there ought to be many meeting those criteria, although I don't know of any in particular.
Do you think it would be fair to broaden this to include women killing men? And physically disabled or weakened men killing women (provided the disability roughly levels out the physical strength differences)?
> who kills people when they're sober
You mean the victims? I think along these lines the killer compromising themself with alcohol or other drugs would add to them not being a loser in a certain sense?
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^][v]#1,176,268
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Maybe alcohol ought to be excluded unless it's used in excess. I've read about many using it in moderation as an aid to calm themselves.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 years after the original post[^][v]#1,176,319
@993,722 (A)
idk, I think he was just happy to finally talk about his hobby. i don't get when serial killers try to hide shit. it's like bitch u killed 20 people, why lie about the 21st
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 years after the original post[^][v]#1,176,322
@previous (J)
I think it's interesting when serial killers confess to murders that they didn't do, because the police were rewarding them with McDonald's