Topic: I've noticed a lot of anti-Semitism from the left lately
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #86,452
I think Jewish values are more in line with conservative Christian values now more than ever.Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later[^] [v] #990,284
I saw some weird anti semitic cartoons from the New York Times I think and it was pretty weird
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #990,286
@OP
> I think Jewish values are more in line with conservative Christian values now more than ever.
that's what the current Israeli government wants you to believe
> I think Jewish values are more in line with conservative Christian values now more than ever.
that's what the current Israeli government wants you to believe
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,334
@990,284 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's obviously the liberal Jew-media trying to get you to bend to anti-semitic feelings. Wait... It's the Jew-media making you believe Jewish attacks are the fault of not-right-wing-fucknuts... No! Wait! It's the Jew controlled shadow government media trying to take itself down! It's totally not the Jew-Liberal media saying that Donald Trump is being sympathetic to white nationalists... Wait... It's THE DEMOCRATS!!! YEP! That's TOTALLY IT! It's them! They're to blame! SEND ALL THE PIPE BOMBS TO JEW-MEDIA WASHINGTON DC. That's what you do when people send pipe bombs to you over your religion and threaten to kill you over your religion and keep making videos about how they blame you for stuff based on your religion. Then you sit around and watch YouTube videos about about Christian white people are SO FUCKING oppressed and get enraged.
It's a good cycle. Just keep doing that, folks.
It's obviously the liberal Jew-media trying to get you to bend to anti-semitic feelings. Wait... It's the Jew-media making you believe Jewish attacks are the fault of not-right-wing-fucknuts... No! Wait! It's the Jew controlled shadow government media trying to take itself down! It's totally not the Jew-Liberal media saying that Donald Trump is being sympathetic to white nationalists... Wait... It's THE DEMOCRATS!!! YEP! That's TOTALLY IT! It's them! They're to blame! SEND ALL THE PIPE BOMBS TO JEW-MEDIA WASHINGTON DC. That's what you do when people send pipe bombs to you over your religion and threaten to kill you over your religion and keep making videos about how they blame you for stuff based on your religion. Then you sit around and watch YouTube videos about about Christian white people are SO FUCKING oppressed and get enraged.
It's a good cycle. Just keep doing that, folks.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,389
@previous (D)
It's not my fault that a major source of new media printed anti Semitic cartoons. Also I would take Jews over Muslims any day. Thanks
It's not my fault that a major source of new media printed anti Semitic cartoons. Also I would take Jews over Muslims any day. Thanks
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,422
From what I saw, it was just editorial cartoon about how Netenyanho pulls Trump in any direction he wants to go, no critical thought of his own
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,426
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
They made Trump look like that Jewish caricature and had Netenyanho as a dog
They made Trump look like that Jewish caricature and had Netenyanho as a dog
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,429
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I saw it, and I disagree that Trump looked like a Jewish caricature. He had a skullcap on and that was the only signal that I saw, but I'll agree that the cap was a distraction from the point of the cartoon. Netenyanho was the dog leading the blind Trump, who had dark glasses. It is common for editorial cartoons to have metaphors. I tried hard to see the Nazi propaganda type Jew face in the cartoon, and I could not see anything like that. His face was drawn oddly faithfully to his real face, which is unusual for political cartoons that are typically grossly caricatured.
I saw it, and I disagree that Trump looked like a Jewish caricature. He had a skullcap on and that was the only signal that I saw, but I'll agree that the cap was a distraction from the point of the cartoon. Netenyanho was the dog leading the blind Trump, who had dark glasses. It is common for editorial cartoons to have metaphors. I tried hard to see the Nazi propaganda type Jew face in the cartoon, and I could not see anything like that. His face was drawn oddly faithfully to his real face, which is unusual for political cartoons that are typically grossly caricatured.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,436
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,437
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
interesting, I don't get that vibe from it, perhaps because the hunch didn't also have the rubbing hands, the giant hook nose, the warty grin, the wild beard
interesting, I don't get that vibe from it, perhaps because the hunch didn't also have the rubbing hands, the giant hook nose, the warty grin, the wild beard
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,473
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,476
Not hooked nose though, just cartoon nose. Note the lack of bridge bump to the nose; it is very straight cut. Note that it does not arch downward also. If you search cartoon jew nose, you will see what to look for.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 23 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,479
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Great defense of anti-Semitism you have there. The nose is not hooked enough?
Great defense of anti-Semitism you have there. The nose is not hooked enough?
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 43 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #990,494
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,626
@990,389 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Seriously, stop eating up the shit you read on 8chan or whatever. You'll apparently fight and die for the right of some shooter's manifesto to come out or video of some asshole shooting a bunch of people to be public, but you protest a guy in a dress reading books at your local library. You're not a warrior for free speech. You're a warrior for what you think should be free speech.
Seriously, stop eating up the shit you read on 8chan or whatever. You'll apparently fight and die for the right of some shooter's manifesto to come out or video of some asshole shooting a bunch of people to be public, but you protest a guy in a dress reading books at your local library. You're not a warrior for free speech. You're a warrior for what you think should be free speech.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,628
@previous (D)
I protest nothing. Do I comment on things? Of course, why wouldn't I?
To be specific, do I seek to stop people from viewing certain media? Only kidfucking shit. Did I raise an eyebrow when two of the library drag queens were outed as sex offenders? You're goddamn right I do, retard.
I protest nothing. Do I comment on things? Of course, why wouldn't I?
To be specific, do I seek to stop people from viewing certain media? Only kidfucking shit. Did I raise an eyebrow when two of the library drag queens were outed as sex offenders? You're goddamn right I do, retard.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,632
wait, wait, wait... what were the books the queens were reading
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,633
@990,628 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
LOL I WANNA BE OFFENDED BY PEOPLE I WANNA BE OFFENDED BY!
https://minichan.org/topic/79272
I guess if "certain media" is presented by drag queens it's outlawed because they are sex offenders? ...or something?
Seriously, I can't keep track of your weird support of free speech (but only by Nazis or whatever) tendencies. Call me when you have a consistent ideology.
LOL I WANNA BE OFFENDED BY PEOPLE I WANNA BE OFFENDED BY!
https://minichan.org/topic/79272
I guess if "certain media" is presented by drag queens it's outlawed because they are sex offenders? ...or something?
Seriously, I can't keep track of your weird support of free speech (but only by Nazis or whatever) tendencies. Call me when you have a consistent ideology.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,635
@990,628 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Or just stop reading 8chan for your opinions or whatever. Seriously, I troll 8chan too. I just think they're fucking morons like all the flat earth people I follow. Grow the fuck up.
Or just stop reading 8chan for your opinions or whatever. Seriously, I troll 8chan too. I just think they're fucking morons like all the flat earth people I follow. Grow the fuck up.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,636
@990,633 (D)
Censorship is when you seek to stop someone from receiving certain information, not the fact that something offends you
Censorship is when you seek to stop someone from receiving certain information, not the fact that something offends you
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,637
@990,635 (D)
Oh I'm sorry that I don't enjoy the fact that a group of creepy ass guys ending up being creepy. It's immature to allow people to do what they want, but have an opinion on it now. My bad
Oh I'm sorry that I don't enjoy the fact that a group of creepy ass guys ending up being creepy. It's immature to allow people to do what they want, but have an opinion on it now. My bad
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,639
@990,636 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yeah, I get that. There is a grace in not putting the details of everyone's grisly killing on the Internet for your friends to laugh at. I'm not sure how this escapes you, when you are so willing to grasp your pearls at something so trivial as Matt posting with a persona. Why do you yell in protest at some things and think other things should be fine? I think it's a question you really need to ask yourself.
Yeah, I get that. There is a grace in not putting the details of everyone's grisly killing on the Internet for your friends to laugh at. I'm not sure how this escapes you, when you are so willing to grasp your pearls at something so trivial as Matt posting with a persona. Why do you yell in protest at some things and think other things should be fine? I think it's a question you really need to ask yourself.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,640
@previous (D)
Because literally everyone does that. Not everything offends you. Not everything makes you happy. That's how it is for everyone.
Also why did you even bring Matt into this? What are you referring to?
Because literally everyone does that. Not everything offends you. Not everything makes you happy. That's how it is for everyone.
Also why did you even bring Matt into this? What are you referring to?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,643
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because literally everyone does that.
Umm. No. Literally, to actually use that correctly, not everyone does that. (I guess that's a double negative, but sure) Are you mad that literally everyone doesn't do that? I'm counting three "I" statements in my last post. Do you think I'm speaking with the voice of everyone when I say "I"?
Seriously: WHAT THE FUCK ARE ON ABOUT?
> Not everything offends you. Not everything makes you happy. That's how it is for everyone.
I don't fucking know what the hell you are talking about when you say this. I'm not talking about everyone. I'm criticizing YOU. Your behavior. Seriously, leave everyone else the fuck out of this.
What the fuck is even wrong with you?
> Because literally everyone does that.
Umm. No. Literally, to actually use that correctly, not everyone does that. (I guess that's a double negative, but sure) Are you mad that literally everyone doesn't do that? I'm counting three "I" statements in my last post. Do you think I'm speaking with the voice of everyone when I say "I"?
Seriously: WHAT THE FUCK ARE ON ABOUT?
> Not everything offends you. Not everything makes you happy. That's how it is for everyone.
I don't fucking know what the hell you are talking about when you say this. I'm not talking about everyone. I'm criticizing YOU. Your behavior. Seriously, leave everyone else the fuck out of this.
What the fuck is even wrong with you?
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,645
@previous (D)
Everyone does do that, by which I mean, pick and chooses what offends them. Just because people are offended by something doesn't mean that they are offended by everything.
I said that because my behavior in that regard is not unusual in any way.
Do I think that videos of violent crimes should be available for perusal? Yes I do. Do I think that a sexualized group of people with no background checks should sermonize to children on government time and property? No I do not.
They are so vastly dissimilar to me that I don't understand the comparison at all.
Once again, why bring up Matt?
Everyone does do that, by which I mean, pick and chooses what offends them. Just because people are offended by something doesn't mean that they are offended by everything.
I said that because my behavior in that regard is not unusual in any way.
Do I think that videos of violent crimes should be available for perusal? Yes I do. Do I think that a sexualized group of people with no background checks should sermonize to children on government time and property? No I do not.
They are so vastly dissimilar to me that I don't understand the comparison at all.
Once again, why bring up Matt?
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,647
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Everyone does do that, by which I mean, pick and chooses what offends them.
Yeah. It's weird how you can spot the horrible people by what that is.
> Everyone does do that, by which I mean, pick and chooses what offends them.
Yeah. It's weird how you can spot the horrible people by what that is.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,648
@previous (D)
I'm not mad at you or anything, but I just don't see it that way. I don't think every "injustice" (how to phrase it?) is equivalent.
Do most people feel this way? I'm slightly shocked.
I'm not mad at you or anything, but I just don't see it that way. I don't think every "injustice" (how to phrase it?) is equivalent.
Do most people feel this way? I'm slightly shocked.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,650
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,656
Anon D sure is a bigot. What an asshole. You don't get to decide what is offensive. You also don't get to decide what people "should" (according to you) be offended by, and then pack a sad when people aren't.
You're likely a left wing anti-semitie, and the only reason you think anti-Semitism is wrong is because you think you can blame it all on Donald Trump.
You're likely a left wing anti-semitie, and the only reason you think anti-Semitism is wrong is because you think you can blame it all on Donald Trump.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,658
@990,648 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Do most people feel this way? I'm slightly shocked.
Yeah, it's weird. Some people feel afraid and shocked when some guy guns people down in their place of worship. You should try finding sympathy instead of whatever laughing you see on the chan sites about the latest mosque or synagogue shooting. As a an actual human, I will tell you it is weirdly addictive how much you can actually feel sorrow for real people once you stop seeing them as interest pieces on the local news or blown up pieces in some mideast country you can't find on a map. It's pretty amazing. I would highly suggest finding some kind of humanity before you die, just so that maybe you can say you really lived.
> Do most people feel this way? I'm slightly shocked.
Yeah, it's weird. Some people feel afraid and shocked when some guy guns people down in their place of worship. You should try finding sympathy instead of whatever laughing you see on the chan sites about the latest mosque or synagogue shooting. As a an actual human, I will tell you it is weirdly addictive how much you can actually feel sorrow for real people once you stop seeing them as interest pieces on the local news or blown up pieces in some mideast country you can't find on a map. It's pretty amazing. I would highly suggest finding some kind of humanity before you die, just so that maybe you can say you really lived.
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,659
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,660
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,661
I don't think that it's funny when people die, and I show empathy to real people that I deal with every day. I have so many stories of things that I have to do to help others with life's tragedies, that I don't talk about here because they are so sad.
You have no idea how sad my average day is regarding the people where I work. Maybe one day if you ask about it later, I will tell you about some of these situations that I'm involved in and the empathy that my reactions entail. I've had so many people cry on me, I've had people beg for death, I've had people been so afraid of dying that I lie to them
I've lied to so many people that I believe that heaven exists and that they will see their family members, I've lied to patients with dementia and told them that their long dead mother is just grocery shopping. I've respected their dignity when they soil themselves, and pretend that I do it too. People tell me that I'm a treasure to have near them because of these things that I do.
You really have no idea, and it kind of shows that you have no empathy.
You have no idea how sad my average day is regarding the people where I work. Maybe one day if you ask about it later, I will tell you about some of these situations that I'm involved in and the empathy that my reactions entail. I've had so many people cry on me, I've had people beg for death, I've had people been so afraid of dying that I lie to them
I've lied to so many people that I believe that heaven exists and that they will see their family members, I've lied to patients with dementia and told them that their long dead mother is just grocery shopping. I've respected their dignity when they soil themselves, and pretend that I do it too. People tell me that I'm a treasure to have near them because of these things that I do.
You really have no idea, and it kind of shows that you have no empathy.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,663
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,664
@990,658 (D)
Being serious here, would it help of I talk more about being sad in my daily life, regarding people and incidences?
Being serious here, would it help of I talk more about being sad in my daily life, regarding people and incidences?
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,666
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It would certainly provide some context. I don't understand why you do what you do. Do you like people? Do you like being around old people and watching them die while posting about serial killers and stuff? I would love a dedicated Kook thread to delve into what being Kook is like and what makes you feel the way you do about things.
EDIT: Okay, maybe I'm asking too much there, but it would be interesting to see things from your point of view for a while.
It would certainly provide some context. I don't understand why you do what you do. Do you like people? Do you like being around old people and watching them die while posting about serial killers and stuff? I would love a dedicated Kook thread to delve into what being Kook is like and what makes you feel the way you do about things.
EDIT: Okay, maybe I'm asking too much there, but it would be interesting to see things from your point of view for a while.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,681
@previous (D)
I don't love watching people die in real life. I really wish no one had to die at all.
But I love the old people. I feel so comfortable around them compared to people my age. I'll let kids, animals, old people, and fanilyngive me affection but no one else.
I don't love watching people die in real life. I really wish no one had to die at all.
But I love the old people. I feel so comfortable around them compared to people my age. I'll let kids, animals, old people, and fanilyngive me affection but no one else.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,727
Anon D was on the right path but then he fell for the kook is retarded meme. She’s as bad as Svet but gets a free pass constantly.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,739
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #990,749
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Don't worry about the "tolerant" lefties who don't tolerate other opinions. They are spoiled children throwing tantrums
Don't worry about the "tolerant" lefties who don't tolerate other opinions. They are spoiled children throwing tantrums