Topic: Fake anon..
Bliss started this discussion 7 years ago #86,404
it is under my understanding that fake anon is a moderator.. Said person has hacked my account and posted a picture.. And Deleted some of my posts.Said user has stated that he/she doesn't give a 'shit' about bestiality posted here..
Bestiality is illegal.. So is hacking, just because you have the tools to hack into my account and post without my consent is hacking thus illegal. So is animal abuse.
This is someone with apparent trust and of high value as a mod/member..
If said user can do this (even childish of things) what else is said user capable of on my account.. Said user can not be trusted in my opinion and I can not take the chance that he/she won't post illegal material on my account without permission..
I am all for giving people chances, albeit reading other people's comments elsewhere about the mods on this forum.. I took the chance to find out for myself.. Being a self confessed arsehole that likes banter and a little light hearted drama, again.. I can't take the chance that said user will abuse his/her powers again & post illegal things from my account.
It was a short stay.. I'm just saying farewell.
Good luck.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #989,756
Seriously, who is this guy? For a guy who claims to have learnt about this place 2 days ago he sure seems invested in it.
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,758
@previous (B)
> Seriously, who is this guy? For a guy who claims to have learnt about this place 2 days ago he sure seems invested in it.
I was going to invest.. Needs a whole new blueprint.
> Seriously, who is this guy? For a guy who claims to have learnt about this place 2 days ago he sure seems invested in it.
I was going to invest.. Needs a whole new blueprint.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,759
How did I hack your account? Please explain what you mean, thank you. We take allegations of moderator misconduct extremely seriously here.
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,762
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> How did I hack your account? Please explain what you mean, thank you. We take allegations of moderator misconduct extremely seriously here.
I have the originals.. I will send to the relevant authorities.
Thank you.
> How did I hack your account? Please explain what you mean, thank you. We take allegations of moderator misconduct extremely seriously here.
I have the originals.. I will send to the relevant authorities.
Thank you.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,763
@previous (Bliss)
Ok, I'm sure Officer Richard N. Balls of the international cyberpolice will be reaching out to us shortly. Please tell them to send all inquiries to [email protected] and [email protected]. Thank you.
Ok, I'm sure Officer Richard N. Balls of the international cyberpolice will be reaching out to us shortly. Please tell them to send all inquiries to [email protected] and [email protected]. Thank you.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,764
I support you Bliss. The mods here are tyrants and hate freedom.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,765
Bert just accept your ban. It's only for a week
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,766
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 28 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,767
I am not bert.. I won't say this again. The fact you don't know who I am should tell you I am serious and should not be messed with.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,769
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,771
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,772
@989,767 (Bliss)
Why would someone not knowing who you are mean you are serious and not to be messed with?
Why would someone not knowing who you are mean you are serious and not to be messed with?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 37 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,773
@989,767 (Bliss)
So if you are not bert. You will not mind if I post your full name and address and other personal details as well as the Western Union location where money was forwarded to you. I can do this because you hacked my account and posted using my full web moniker and you did that with images proving you have pedo intentions. I rote this without my first cup of Triple Espresso so excuse the messed up Syntax of my Inglish.
So if you are not bert. You will not mind if I post your full name and address and other personal details as well as the Western Union location where money was forwarded to you. I can do this because you hacked my account and posted using my full web moniker and you did that with images proving you have pedo intentions. I rote this without my first cup of Triple Espresso so excuse the messed up Syntax of my Inglish.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,780
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,782
@989,773 (F)
> So if you are not bert. You will not mind if I post your full name and address and other personal details as well as the Western Union location where money was forwarded to you. I can do this because you hacked my account and posted using my full web moniker and you did that with images proving you have pedo intentions. I rote this without my first cup of Triple Espresso so excuse the messed up Syntax of my Inglish.
I am not bert. And no you can not post anyone's private details, we do not know each other.. As I said I am new here and won't be messed about. Do you want to be charged with libel? If not I suggest you shut up.
If you find out who I am and are not happy with me feel free to knock on my door and let me know.
> So if you are not bert. You will not mind if I post your full name and address and other personal details as well as the Western Union location where money was forwarded to you. I can do this because you hacked my account and posted using my full web moniker and you did that with images proving you have pedo intentions. I rote this without my first cup of Triple Espresso so excuse the messed up Syntax of my Inglish.
I am not bert. And no you can not post anyone's private details, we do not know each other.. As I said I am new here and won't be messed about. Do you want to be charged with libel? If not I suggest you shut up.
If you find out who I am and are not happy with me feel free to knock on my door and let me know.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,783
@previous (Bliss)
Syntax is a powerful man with many satellites. I would not be so quick to challenge a man who is only 3 shares short of having a board seat at Qualcomm.
Syntax is a powerful man with many satellites. I would not be so quick to challenge a man who is only 3 shares short of having a board seat at Qualcomm.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,786
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,787
@989,783 (D)
> Syntax is a powerful man with many satellites. I would not be so quick to challenge a man who is only 3 shares short of having a board seat at Qualcomm.
Oh good.. Then he will know where to find me or shut his fucking mouth like the rest of you cowards.
Tell me my real name & I'll give you some credit where due..
> Syntax is a powerful man with many satellites. I would not be so quick to challenge a man who is only 3 shares short of having a board seat at Qualcomm.
Oh good.. Then he will know where to find me or shut his fucking mouth like the rest of you cowards.
Tell me my real name & I'll give you some credit where due..
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,788
@989,771 (D)
It's just suspicious that a person who types like Bert showed up using several different ip addresses after he was banned.
It's just suspicious that a person who types like Bert showed up using several different ip addresses after he was banned.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,789
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,790
@989,788 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's just suspicious that a person who types like Bert showed up using several different ip addresses after he was banned.
That isn't anything to do with me.
> It's just suspicious that a person who types like Bert showed up using several different ip addresses after he was banned.
That isn't anything to do with me.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,791
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,792
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,793
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,794
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,795
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,796
@989,794 (D)
> That seems like mod abuse
He only has himself to blame.. My legal team will be in discussion with Toby in due course.. This is illegal.
> That seems like mod abuse
He only has himself to blame.. My legal team will be in discussion with Toby in due course.. This is illegal.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,797
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,798
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,799
@989,796 (Bliss)
> > That seems like mod abuse
>
> He only has himself to blame.. My legal team will be in discussion with Toby in due course.. This is illegal.
Who is Toby?
> > That seems like mod abuse
>
> He only has himself to blame.. My legal team will be in discussion with Toby in due course.. This is illegal.
Who is Toby?
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,800
Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,802
@989,782 (Bliss)
Bliss I did not say I was going to post private details about you. I don't no you and you don't no bert so you should have no problems with my need to fuck bert over just as he attempted to fuck me over.
Besides you wood never want to back up a person like bert. Bert searches the web for very young children dressed up (minimally) to excite pedophiles. He also has nasty intentions towards his sister.
What I am going to do is first send Fake Anon and other mods the private details because well just because and let them mull it over. They say the More you no
Bliss I did not say I was going to post private details about you. I don't no you and you don't no bert so you should have no problems with my need to fuck bert over just as he attempted to fuck me over.
Besides you wood never want to back up a person like bert. Bert searches the web for very young children dressed up (minimally) to excite pedophiles. He also has nasty intentions towards his sister.
What I am going to do is first send Fake Anon and other mods the private details because well just because and let them mull it over. They say the More you no
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,803
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,804
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,805
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,806
@989,804 (D)
Of the many details I have on bert - It does not include details about his penis. We all no that bert has not been able to use his penis with a woman in over a decade and we no that because he told us that much. Might be two decades.
Of the many details I have on bert - It does not include details about his penis. We all no that bert has not been able to use his penis with a woman in over a decade and we no that because he told us that much. Might be two decades.
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,807
@989,798 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Mod abuse isn't illegal
Data protection is taken very seriously.. Obviously they know nothing about it.
> Mod abuse isn't illegal
Data protection is taken very seriously.. Obviously they know nothing about it.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,808
@previous (Bliss)
Places a bet that Syntax will fuck over someones data in ways even mods have not thought of.
Places a bet that Syntax will fuck over someones data in ways even mods have not thought of.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,811
@989,807 (Bliss)
I refer you to our GDPR document, as you appear to be posting from within the EU: https://minichan.org/gdpr
As per Article 64, we will of course require proof of identity for any request made under GDPR; this could be a passport, drivers licence, utility bill or similar. You must be a Data Subject legally resident inside the EU. We handle this data with the utmost care and it will not be retained. We further reserve the right (Article 12(5)(a)) to charge a reasonable fee if your request is considered manifestly unfounded or excessive. Thanks.
I refer you to our GDPR document, as you appear to be posting from within the EU: https://minichan.org/gdpr
As per Article 64, we will of course require proof of identity for any request made under GDPR; this could be a passport, drivers licence, utility bill or similar. You must be a Data Subject legally resident inside the EU. We handle this data with the utmost care and it will not be retained. We further reserve the right (Article 12(5)(a)) to charge a reasonable fee if your request is considered manifestly unfounded or excessive. Thanks.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,812
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
> I refer you to our GDPR document, as you appear to be posting from within the EU: https://minichan.org/gdpr
>
> As per Article 64, we will of course require proof of identity; this could be a passport, drivers licence, utility bill or similar. You must be a Data Subject legally resident inside the EU. We handle this data with the utmost care and it will not be retained. We further reserve the right to charge a reasonable fee if your request is considered manifestly unfounded or excessive. Thanks.
Yes I saw this.. It's illegal in itself. As you are not bound to be a 'member' this isn't a club. You are not selling anything. You can not solicit by giving 'nothing' in return. A judge will laugh at you. And so do I.
> I refer you to our GDPR document, as you appear to be posting from within the EU: https://minichan.org/gdpr
>
> As per Article 64, we will of course require proof of identity; this could be a passport, drivers licence, utility bill or similar. You must be a Data Subject legally resident inside the EU. We handle this data with the utmost care and it will not be retained. We further reserve the right to charge a reasonable fee if your request is considered manifestly unfounded or excessive. Thanks.
Yes I saw this.. It's illegal in itself. As you are not bound to be a 'member' this isn't a club. You are not selling anything. You can not solicit by giving 'nothing' in return. A judge will laugh at you. And so do I.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,814
@previous (Bliss)
> Yes I saw this.. It's illegal in itself
Attorneys that deal with issues like this charge $750/hr. Currently no one has overturned a single GDPR decree. Multiple law firms necessary to even open a case.
> Yes I saw this.. It's illegal in itself
Attorneys that deal with issues like this charge $750/hr. Currently no one has overturned a single GDPR decree. Multiple law firms necessary to even open a case.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,815
@989,812 (Bliss)
Unfortunately, we must first establish your identity before considering any GDPR request pertaining to personal data. Any request that is manifestly unfounded or excessive will be rejected, and I remind you of our right to charge a reasonable fee for any such frivolous requests.
Thank you for using Minichan BBS™, and may you have a pleasant day!
Unfortunately, we must first establish your identity before considering any GDPR request pertaining to personal data. Any request that is manifestly unfounded or excessive will be rejected, and I remind you of our right to charge a reasonable fee for any such frivolous requests.
Thank you for using Minichan BBS™, and may you have a pleasant day!
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,817
@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)> Unfortunately, we must first establish your identity before considering any GDPR request pertaining to personal data. Any request that is manifestly unfounded or excessive will be rejected, and I remind you of our right to charge a reasonable fee for any such frivolous requests.
>
> Thank you for using Minichan BBS™, and may you have a pleasant day!
No. You hold absolutely no power of that information. As I said, my legal team will be in touch with whomever is necessary.
Cheers.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,819
Fucking shit site with shit moderators!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 14 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,820
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,822
Breech of data protection & hacking along with a view of 'bestiality isn't an issue' are all morally wrong from moderators and illegal regarding legality.(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,823
@previous (Bliss)You are ban evading. You have no rights. We have every right to continue to make life miserable for you.