Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago#86,388
Graphic depictions of beastiality involving dogs and females is ok.
A picture which causes random individuals to imagine non nude underage females were displaying 'bedroom eyes' is not.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#989,583
@989,578 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think he means the dogsex thread. We are a lot more lenient with text but we will not allow anything that could reasonably be considered cp here and we don't really give a shit about bestiality.
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#989,586
That says a lot about you.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#989,589
Ok, thank you.
I believe this is not the site for me and I shall move along.
Godd day.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#989,593
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#989,642
@989,596 (Bedpan dept)
Where did you even find that image? Did you make it yourself from other pictures? Did you have it saved previously?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#989,671
@989,583 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I feel like if we had actual pedophiles here it would take time away from making fun of the alt-right asshats and neo-not-really-nazi-actually-fine-people-whatever-the-alt-right-is-trying-to-call-themselves-now guys. Having to deal with real pedophile apologists would really cut into time spent enjoying the board.