Minichan

Topic: Question about the site

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #86,388

Graphic depictions of beastiality involving dogs and females is ok.
A picture which causes random individuals to imagine non nude underage females were displaying 'bedroom eyes' is not.


Is that correct?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #989,544

And a fart joke is instant ban.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,546

careful about mentioning the war

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 25 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,548

Where is there dog fuck pics?

Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 2 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,549

@989,546 (Sheila LaBoof)
Which?

Anonymous B double-posted this 7 years ago, 26 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,550

Externally hosted image@989,548 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Going to rush off to find them?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,551

@previous (B)
I don't think that they exist. Also I can find dog fuck pics on the internet easily
Also ugh that is hideous

Ben Johnson joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,559

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
ugh what a surprise he's a pedophile too

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,561

Don't post lewd images featuring children you mongrel.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,572

Could I get an answer, please?

Bliss joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,573

@previous (A)

> Could I get an answer, please?

The guys a spastic.. You are better off asking someone else.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,574

@989,572 (A)
What bestiality pics are you referring to? I don't recall seeing that?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,575

@989,573 (Bliss)
Are we all spastic in this thread?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,576

@989,574 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Can you please reference where I mentioned pics of beastiality?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,577

Someone is banned because of spasticity.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,578

@989,576 (A)
What do you mean by graphic depictions?
Wait you mean furry drawings?

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Bliss replied with this 7 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,579

@989,575 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> Are we all spastic in this thread?

I don't know.. Are we?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,580

@previous (Bliss)
Yes

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,583

@989,578 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think he means the dogsex thread. We are a lot more lenient with text but we will not allow anything that could reasonably be considered cp here and we don't really give a shit about bestiality.

(Edited 7 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,586

That says a lot about you.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,589

Ok, thank you.
I believe this is not the site for me and I shall move along.
Godd day.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,593

@previous (A)
You'll be missed probably.

Bedpan dept (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,596

Gross

(Edited 59 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,637

@989,593 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

Probably not.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,638

@previous (H)
No, but also he wasn't ever actually going to leave anyway so it's fine.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,640

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

I'm pretending to be relieved!

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,642

@989,596 (Bedpan dept)
Where did you even find that image? Did you make it yourself from other pictures? Did you have it saved previously?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,671

@989,583 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I feel like if we had actual pedophiles here it would take time away from making fun of the alt-right asshats and neo-not-really-nazi-actually-fine-people-whatever-the-alt-right-is-trying-to-call-themselves-now guys. Having to deal with real pedophile apologists would really cut into time spent enjoying the board.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.