Topic: Anyone into politics?
Bliss started this discussion 7 years ago #86,384
What's your political preference? (no shitposting)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 seconds later[^] [v] #989,458
No. Nobody is.
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #989,459
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,460
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 44 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,461
No, we are only into shitposting and stalking each other. Thanks.
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 53 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,462
@989,460 (B)
> I'm just answering the question from your headline.
Isn't it a bit arrogant to speak on behalf of other people?
> I'm just answering the question from your headline.
Isn't it a bit arrogant to speak on behalf of other people?
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,463
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,466
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,469
@previous (Bliss)
Hold on, I'll look up some quotes from the hit 1999 film 'The Matrix'. You like those, right?
Hold on, I'll look up some quotes from the hit 1999 film 'The Matrix'. You like those, right?
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 58 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,470
@previous (B)
> Hold on, I'll look up some quotes from the hit 1999 film 'The Matrix'. You like those, right?
I don't know what you are talking about.. More waffle?
> Hold on, I'll look up some quotes from the hit 1999 film 'The Matrix'. You like those, right?
I don't know what you are talking about.. More waffle?
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,474
Ben Johnson joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 0 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,475
pee pee
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,476
Well I see it's against forum rules to go off topic, so I'll just ask is there any SJW, liberal, homosexual, feminist, Donald Trump hating left wing nut jobs I should stay away from?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,478
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,479
I prefer politics with no reference to any named kind of politics. That is, very specific description and understanding of any given policy in terms of straightforward goal, accounting, oversight, and evaluation of consequence.
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,480
@989,476 (Bliss)
> Well I see it's against forum rules to go off topic, so I'll just ask is there any SJW, liberal, homosexual, feminist, Donald Trump hating left wing nut jobs I should stay away from?
well you're already stuck to a tar baby there
> Well I see it's against forum rules to go off topic, so I'll just ask is there any SJW, liberal, homosexual, feminist, Donald Trump hating left wing nut jobs I should stay away from?
well you're already stuck to a tar baby there
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,481
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,483
@989,479 (Sheila LaBoof)
> I prefer politics with no reference to any named kind of politics. That is, very specific description and understanding of any given policy in terms of straightforward goal, accounting, oversight, and evaluation of consequence.
So just anarchy?
> I prefer politics with no reference to any named kind of politics. That is, very specific description and understanding of any given policy in terms of straightforward goal, accounting, oversight, and evaluation of consequence.
So just anarchy?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 11 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,484
Yes a lot of them here. But they are still good people
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,487
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,489
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
> what no, as I understand the term, there's no actual state in the first place
Yes.. Anarchism is what I think you are referring too. As in no laws? State or governments?
> what no, as I understand the term, there's no actual state in the first place
Yes.. Anarchism is what I think you are referring too. As in no laws? State or governments?
Ben Johnson replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,490
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 45 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #989,491
Bliss (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,494
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
> no you brought up that idea for some reason
Yes.. That is what you was commenting about, I don't think this thread is for you sweetheart.
> no you brought up that idea for some reason
Yes.. That is what you was commenting about, I don't think this thread is for you sweetheart.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,498
@previous (Bliss)
you don't seem to comprehend and you make weird assumptions based on what you thought you read, and then you can't even articulate that.
you don't seem to comprehend and you make weird assumptions based on what you thought you read, and then you can't even articulate that.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,507
@989,494 (Bliss)
I think he is referring to politics without framing it under left wing or right wing bias
I think he is referring to politics without framing it under left wing or right wing bias
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #989,511
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
yeah, the words are not useful to me, simply not specfic to anything except whatever people imagine in their own heads when they hear these terms
so practicality and usefulness is served by directing attention to well described specific policy without the bullshit baggage
yeah, the words are not useful to me, simply not specfic to anything except whatever people imagine in their own heads when they hear these terms
so practicality and usefulness is served by directing attention to well described specific policy without the bullshit baggage