Minichan

Topic: Red on the head like the dick on a dog..

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #86,331

Make it 600 you damned fag..

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #988,787

Fuck off pedo

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,893

Fagbert is a poofter

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,897

How long is pedobert banned for?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,898

What did he do? Serious question, I just woke up and I'm having a hard time piecing together the drama.

Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,899

@previous (E)
Posted CP and used Syntax's moniker. I didn't see the pic so I don't know what it was.

Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,900

@previous (D)
Was it really cp or are people just saying that because they don't like bert? Nobody seems to have actually seen it.

Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,901

@previous (E)
It got him banned on TC as well. And you know TC hardly bans anyone.... Mainly cause they ain't got anyone lol

Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,928

@previous (D)

> It got him banned on TC as well. And you know TC hardly bans anyone.... Mainly cause they ain't got anyone lol

He's not banned there, he's posting no problem. If he's a pedophile why has Tinychan offered him safe haven?

tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,929

@988,898 (E)
Posted an image featuring scantily-clad child "models", under Syntax's name. I literally never ban anybody, but CP of any sort is where I draw the line.
@988,897 (D)
A week.

tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,933

@988,900 (E)
I saw it, and two other people had reported it. I think kook saw it too, judging by her replies in that thread. It wasn't hardcore CP, but (young) children posing in their underwear made to look sexually suggestive.

It wasn't the sort that merits a report to the police (thankfully — we've had to do that before, it's a pain in the arse) but enough that he can fuck off for a bit. :)

Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,934

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Fair enough. He's throwing a tantrum at you on TC by the way.

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,935

@previous (E)
Ha, yeah, I noticed. Maybe it'll liven the place up, it looks dead as fuck!

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,936

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Extend his ban for threatening you.

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,938

@previous (G)
Nah, there's no rule against being mean.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,965

@988,929 (tteh !MemesToDNA)

The only person openly willing to provide support, and he went and mucked that right up. It's sad, but stupid is as stupid does.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,967

@previous (H)
Bert now gets the newest title of Pedofilth. Scantily-clad child "models" Now that we know the kind of shit he faps too.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,970

@previous (I)

I can't believe any nonpedofilth would be able to type in the search terms necessary to find that crap. Even MC users, with our diminished sense of morality, know better than to fool around with that nasty shit.

Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,973

@previous (H)
Still makes me pissed off that parents will turn kids into sexy models and put them in contests.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,974

@previous (I)

Me too, whoever came up with the idea of child models should be bludgeoned with bats that have nails hammered through them.

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,979

@988,965 (H)
It's bizarre! I don't think he expected to be called out. He posted it from a brand new UID, but surely he knows we can see IPs...
@988,973 (I)
I agree, though there are the distasteful contests you see on TV, and then there's 'models' of the type he posted; usually kids exploited from a young age, often Ukrainian or Russian and from poorer backgrounds.

How he thought it would be "funny" to post is beyond me.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,987

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Will see how funny he finds being called pedofilth when he returns. Kook called him out on it and many others will join in.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,989

@988,979 (tteh !MemesToDNA)

Yeah, like I said, I doubt a nonpedo could post such things. I think you were lenient towards him, considering On said he would have permabanned him.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 57 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #988,991

@988,987 (J)
I'm pretty (maybe irrationally) angry about it

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 24 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,000

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You saw it, right? (Just so people don't have to take my word for it.)
@988,989 (H)
It probably should've been a longer ban, tbh. It'll be permanent if he does it again.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,001

@988,991 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Are you on your period. That will explain any irrationality

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,008

@989,000 (tteh !MemesToDNA)

You truly a god among men, tteh.

@previous (K)

Rude.

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,010

@previous (H)
<3

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,011

@989,000 (tteh !MemesToDNA)

I didn't but I was able to deduce that it was a softcore porn image of several 10-13 year old girls posing suggestively in swimwear.

What a stupid thing to post. It's depressing to see the depths of his moral and intellectual failure in not seeing a problem with accessing and sharing that data.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,012

@previous (L)
Pretty much! Quality deducting. ?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,015

@989,000 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Yes I did

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 33 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,016

@989,001 (K)
No not yet. Maybe I am pmsing

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,035

@989,011 (L)
> I didn't but I was able to deduce that it was a softcore porn image of several 10-13 year old girls posing suggestively in swimwear.
Fast view when it was on TC. Age range 10 to 13 year old and one was not in swim wear. Some kind of nighty-lingerie.
Kook what is your memory of the images.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,036

@previous (M)
It was a block of four images. Two were kids in swim wear or under wear. The other two were kids in bed giving "bedroom eyes"

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,068

@988,901 (D)

> And you know TC hardly bans anyone.... Mainly cause they ain't got anyone lol

Are you joking? Namefag banned for me a month 2 days ago because I keep posting the Hefford picture to the doctor. He banned me because he says it is "spam". Ironically I only ever post it in response to the doctor's spamming of his own pictures. That's all fine with Namefag, apparently. It's never spam when his pedo pet doctor does it.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,089

@previous (N)

WTF? Where is Fuckalms when you need xir?

Ben Johnson joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 30 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,113

@989,068 (N)
loool but nobody else posts
idiot

Anonymous N replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,117

@previous (Ben Johnson)

> loool but nobody else posts
> idiot

loool but that made no sense
idiot

Ben Johnson replied with this 7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,128

@previous (N)
what I meant the namefag guy or whatever damn
defensive ass

Anonymous N replied with this 7 years ago, 24 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #989,137

@previous (Ben Johnson)

> what I meant the namefag guy or whatever damn
> defensive ass

Ah, gotcha
sorry
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.