Topic: Having sex with someone twice your age (or just much older than you)
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #8,633
What do you guys think about having sex with someone much older than yourself? I had quite a lot of (gay) sex with someone twice my age and it kinda feels like I sucked off my dad. I dunno. What do you guys think about this?
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #151,533
If you wanna suck off your dad's classmates, go for it. Not like you're hurting anything.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,534
What about someone half your age?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,535
I was going to sup To4str, but I'm not feeling it.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,540
36? Could be alright, given their faces aren't already creased up like an origami crane.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,542
@151,534 (C)
I don't think anyone here would turn down someone half their age and the desired gender.
I don't think anyone here would turn down someone half their age and the desired gender.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,543
Falco !PZmcClOUDk double-posted this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,545
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,550
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,555
@151,540 (E)
32? I'm almost 20...
@151,545 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".
32? I'm almost 20...
@151,545 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,557
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,559
@151,555 (A)
> You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".
Yes I would. I would say "No". I am sincerely telling you that I would say "No."
here I go, getting trolled in a to4str thread. This is a brand new low for me.
> You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".
Yes I would. I would say "No". I am sincerely telling you that I would say "No."
here I go, getting trolled in a to4str thread. This is a brand new low for me.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,562
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,563
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,567
I might :') have engaged in some kind of sexual activity with a person greater than double my age, and let's just say I won't be doing it again anytime soon.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,568
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,570
@151,567 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
another way to look at this, is they engaged in sexual activity with someone half their age.
another way to look at this, is they engaged in sexual activity with someone half their age.
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,571
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,572
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,575
@151,563 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
It's all subjective. One cannot deny the innocence and beauty of children. I see the face of God in every child.
@151,567 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
But they're much more experienced.
It's all subjective. One cannot deny the innocence and beauty of children. I see the face of God in every child.
@151,567 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
But they're much more experienced.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,577
pic related its to4str's gloryhole experience.SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,578
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,579
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,580
Hmmm. I'm a woman but would only or rather prefer to date men a bit older than I am. I think this preference will work out better as I get older.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,581
@151,570 (C)
Hell, I would half sex with someone a third of my own age if it was consensual. That is another topic completely. Can we stay on topic please?
Hell, I would half sex with someone a third of my own age if it was consensual. That is another topic completely. Can we stay on topic please?
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,582
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,583
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,585
@previous (H)
After having sex with a man when I was that age, I can't see a problem with it. As long as it's consensual.
After having sex with a man when I was that age, I can't see a problem with it. As long as it's consensual.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,586
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,587
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,588
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,590
@151,587 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,591
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,594
@previous (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
That concerns when the government recognizes consent.
A child can consent, but the government will disregard it.
That concerns when the government recognizes consent.
A child can consent, but the government will disregard it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,595
@151,588 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Obviously one must be able to verbalize in order to consent. There must also be no coercion or bribery.
Obviously one must be able to verbalize in order to consent. There must also be no coercion or bribery.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,596
@151,590 (C)
Children cannot consent because they don't understand what they are agreeing to. That's also why they can't sign contracts, drink, drive, or join the army.
Children cannot consent because they don't understand what they are agreeing to. That's also why they can't sign contracts, drink, drive, or join the army.
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,597
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,598
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,599
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,605
@151,596 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man). How do the children "not understand" the logistics of sex? Lets face it, it isn't very fucking elaborate.
@151,598 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Depends on a number of factors. It shouldn't cause any physical harm either.
Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man). How do the children "not understand" the logistics of sex? Lets face it, it isn't very fucking elaborate.
@151,598 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Depends on a number of factors. It shouldn't cause any physical harm either.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,609
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,610
@151,605 (A)
> Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man).
yeah in your fucked up fantasies maybe. fuck off, idiot.
> Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man).
yeah in your fucked up fantasies maybe. fuck off, idiot.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,615
@previous (H)
I have spoken to many who have wanted me to drive out to them.
Picture related, he's 14.
I have spoken to many who have wanted me to drive out to them.
Picture related, he's 14.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,616
@previous (A)
> Picture related, he's 14.
Why the fuck was my picture deleted?
> Picture related, he's 14.
Why the fuck was my picture deleted?
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,619
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,620
@151,616 (A)
It's called pedobashing. Some day the world will look back in disgust at the intolerance of the age.
It's called pedobashing. Some day the world will look back in disgust at the intolerance of the age.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,622
@previous (C)
Gay sex was illegal in the UK until 1967. It would not surprise me if people gradually realized that not all pedophiles are rapists/evil and the laws are changed accordingly.
Gay sex was illegal in the UK until 1967. It would not surprise me if people gradually realized that not all pedophiles are rapists/evil and the laws are changed accordingly.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,625
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,627
@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)> You still have yet to resolve the physics issues inherent in babyfucking, sir.
> physics issues
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,630
@151,605 (A)
So you think that a two year old or any child for that matter is mature enough to understand the risks of sexual activity?
So you think that a two year old or any child for that matter is mature enough to understand the risks of sexual activity?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,631
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,632
@151,625 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> physics issues inherent in babyfucking
Hmmmm...
> fuck baby
> create a rip in the time-space continuum
> physics issues inherent in babyfucking
Hmmmm...
> fuck baby
> create a rip in the time-space continuum
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,633
@151,627 (C)
We need an international commission to develop a licensure procedure so men with micropenii can be granted the freedoms of babyfucking that are so desperately needed in this bold, new post-pederast world.
We need an international commission to develop a licensure procedure so men with micropenii can be granted the freedoms of babyfucking that are so desperately needed in this bold, new post-pederast world.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,634
14+ should be the minimum AoC.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,635
@151,630 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
You keep mentioning two-year-olds because it's much more controversial. I do not condone sex with babies but acknowledge that some children are mature enough to understand and consent to sex.
You keep mentioning two-year-olds because it's much more controversial. I do not condone sex with babies but acknowledge that some children are mature enough to understand and consent to sex.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,637
> spending more time on the internet whining about sexual issues than actually getting laid
Sure is average intelligence middle class white suburban male, in hurr.
Sure is average intelligence middle class white suburban male, in hurr.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,638
@151,635 (A)
No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line. Would some two year old's be mature enough to have sex? Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line. Would some two year old's be mature enough to have sex? Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,639
@151,631 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Also, why can't children vote
Because children do not read the news, pay attention to politics, etc. They would vote in Hannah Montana, and Justin Beiber.
> drink
The brain is developing throughout childhood, and really stops physical development around 21, so drinking during this time increases the chance of alcoholism. If everyone waited until they were 21 to drink, alcoholism would be very rare. The damage that is done before 21 is much more than damage done after the age.
> drive
Because they can't reach the pedal? The aren't as coordinated as an adult, and would have trouble following the rules, and would have less impulse control (racing).
> or sign a contract?
They can sign a contract, but it's considered void. For good reason too, letting someone get themselves into debt, as well as other obligations is hard to get out of. With sex, you can say stop at any time.
> Also, why can't children vote
Because children do not read the news, pay attention to politics, etc. They would vote in Hannah Montana, and Justin Beiber.
> drink
The brain is developing throughout childhood, and really stops physical development around 21, so drinking during this time increases the chance of alcoholism. If everyone waited until they were 21 to drink, alcoholism would be very rare. The damage that is done before 21 is much more than damage done after the age.
> drive
Because they can't reach the pedal? The aren't as coordinated as an adult, and would have trouble following the rules, and would have less impulse control (racing).
> or sign a contract?
They can sign a contract, but it's considered void. For good reason too, letting someone get themselves into debt, as well as other obligations is hard to get out of. With sex, you can say stop at any time.
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,640
@151,638 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
The child.
> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
The child.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,641
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,642
@151,639 (C)
They cannot say stop at any time. Children are under the power of the adults around them. Do you really think that they would get a fair say in regards to their sexual treatment?
They cannot say stop at any time. Children are under the power of the adults around them. Do you really think that they would get a fair say in regards to their sexual treatment?
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,643
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,644
@151,638 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line.
I don't want to say that sex with a child of that age should be outlawed because there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions. As long is there is consent, there is no coercion, blackmail etc... That's the software part, the hardware must be compatible too.
> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
The child. I would much rather see a system where people are able to make their own decisions than one which takes a general rule of thumb (AoC) and apply it to everyone.
> No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line.
I don't want to say that sex with a child of that age should be outlawed because there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions. As long is there is consent, there is no coercion, blackmail etc... That's the software part, the hardware must be compatible too.
> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
The child. I would much rather see a system where people are able to make their own decisions than one which takes a general rule of thumb (AoC) and apply it to everyone.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,645
@previous (A)
> there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions
Ohhh sweet, sweet delusion.
> there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions
Ohhh sweet, sweet delusion.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,646
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,648
swamplights !!V3J448+/B triple-posted this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,649
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,651
I, for one, believe that babyfucking can get this economy back on track.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,652
@151,648 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Opposite sex incest should be illegal because it creates mutilated, deformed babies. Same sex incest is another matter.
Opposite sex incest should be illegal because it creates mutilated, deformed babies. Same sex incest is another matter.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,654
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,661
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,667
@151,642 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
If a party involved in sexual intercourse says "stop" and the partner refuses, it is rape, I never said it wouldn't be for anything else.
You could argue that a poor person is under the influence of the person they depend on for housing, or that a shy person it under the influence of the people pressuring them into sex as well.
If a party involved in sexual intercourse says "stop" and the partner refuses, it is rape, I never said it wouldn't be for anything else.
You could argue that a poor person is under the influence of the person they depend on for housing, or that a shy person it under the influence of the people pressuring them into sex as well.
Anonymous C triple-posted this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,668
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,673
@151,667 (C)
It's not the same, because children have no independence. Do you think a little boy could or would freely tell his father to stop molesting him?
It's not the same, because children have no independence. Do you think a little boy could or would freely tell his father to stop molesting him?
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,675
@151,649 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The risks of sex are easily mitigated with condoms.
Just as some would say Marihuana shouldn't be illegal because smoke does damage to the lungs because there are other ways of taking the drug, so this argument could be applied to this scenario:
Helping someone masturbate.
Oral sex.
Etc. that do not have the risks of typical sex.
The risks of sex are easily mitigated with condoms.
Just as some would say Marihuana shouldn't be illegal because smoke does damage to the lungs because there are other ways of taking the drug, so this argument could be applied to this scenario:
Helping someone masturbate.
Oral sex.
Etc. that do not have the risks of typical sex.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,676
@151,673 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Again, you're bringing rape into the equation here. We already established it needs to be consensual.
Again, you're bringing rape into the equation here. We already established it needs to be consensual.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,677
@151,675 (C)
Should children be allowed to smoke? Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?
Should children be allowed to smoke? Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,678
@151,673 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He could avoid consenting in the first place, and if he did consent and changed his mind, yes, he could say "stop".
He could avoid consenting in the first place, and if he did consent and changed his mind, yes, he could say "stop".
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,679
@151,677 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Should children be allowed to smoke?
Children are more susceptible to addiction.
> Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?
Those that cause physical damage, yes.
> Should children be allowed to smoke?
Children are more susceptible to addiction.
> Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?
Those that cause physical damage, yes.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,680
@151,676 (A)
How could it ever be consensual? Who would a child ever have sex with that didn't have complete power over the child? You would have to exclude family, babysitters, teachers, coaches, and clergymen.
How could it ever be consensual? Who would a child ever have sex with that didn't have complete power over the child? You would have to exclude family, babysitters, teachers, coaches, and clergymen.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,681
@151,678 (C)
Then he would have to live with the person that he angered by turning down sex. None of this makes sense to you?
Then he would have to live with the person that he angered by turning down sex. None of this makes sense to you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,682
@151,680 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
God, you're such an idiot. Not everyone that has sex with children wants to have "complete power over them".
God, you're such an idiot. Not everyone that has sex with children wants to have "complete power over them".
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,683
@151,681 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Where did you get the idea that only children can be under this dependence?
Where did you get the idea that only children can be under this dependence?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,685
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,686
@151,682 (A)
They just want to unleash the love those children so desperately need, huh? You pædos are so selfless. If only the normals were looking out for the kids’ needs.
They just want to unleash the love those children so desperately need, huh? You pædos are so selfless. If only the normals were looking out for the kids’ needs.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,688
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,689
@151,685 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Your questions rely on the assumption that everyone who wants sex with a child wants to use them for their own pleasure and dominate them physically.
Your questions rely on the assumption that everyone who wants sex with a child wants to use them for their own pleasure and dominate them physically.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,691
@previous (A)
Should parents be allowed to have sex with their children? Teachers? Coaches? Religious figures?
Should parents be allowed to have sex with their children? Teachers? Coaches? Religious figures?
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,692
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,693
Have we resolved which positions are most gratifying? I’m talking about the slides, swings, and mary-go-rounds. Do we need to add bedrooms to the house play structures?
Which time of day is better for babyfucking? The morning nap, afternoon snacktime, or afternoon nap?
Which time of day is better for babyfucking? The morning nap, afternoon snacktime, or afternoon nap?
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,694
@151,688 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
There are many women dependent on their husbands to stay off the streets, and cannot scrape together enough to live without them, and have little work history.
Is the husband committing rape?
There are many women dependent on their husbands to stay off the streets, and cannot scrape together enough to live without them, and have little work history.
Is the husband committing rape?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,696
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,697
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,698
@151,694 (C)
Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family, or just not fucking their husbands. What choices do children have?
Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family, or just not fucking their husbands. What choices do children have?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,700
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,701
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,702
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,703
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,704
@151,696 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
This @151,698 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family,
Not necessarily.
> just not fucking their husbands.
To quote you: "Then [s]he would have to live with the person that [s]he angered by turning down sex"
This @151,698 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
> Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family,
Not necessarily.
> just not fucking their husbands.
To quote you: "Then [s]he would have to live with the person that [s]he angered by turning down sex"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,706
@151,701 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Children would have to be educated about sex early on. They would have to learn that having sex with someone is their decision to make, if someone makes the decision for them then they should report the crime and it would be dealt with as rape.
Children would have to be educated about sex early on. They would have to learn that having sex with someone is their decision to make, if someone makes the decision for them then they should report the crime and it would be dealt with as rape.
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,707
ITT: fucktarded trolling to the nth degree
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,708
@151,704 (C)
Adults always have options. What could the child do? If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.
Adults always have options. What could the child do? If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,709
@151,702 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> Kids can just say no
Yes, they can. If someone ignores a child when they say "no", then that individual needs to be locked up.
> Kids can just say no
Yes, they can. If someone ignores a child when they say "no", then that individual needs to be locked up.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,710
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,711
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,712
@151,709 (A)
Exactly. Sex and daily vegetable servings are the decisions that are holding our children back from true freedom.
Exactly. Sex and daily vegetable servings are the decisions that are holding our children back from true freedom.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,715
@151,711 (A)
That's not the point. I said that children are frequently coerced into sex even now while its illegal. Why do you think that will change if it's legalized?
That's not the point. I said that children are frequently coerced into sex even now while its illegal. Why do you think that will change if it's legalized?
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,717
@151,708 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Adults do not always have options, and this should be obvious from the repeat domestic abuse cases.
> If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.
No different than the way it is now.
Adults do not always have options, and this should be obvious from the repeat domestic abuse cases.
> If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.
No different than the way it is now.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,718
@151,706 (A)
The CPSC desperately needs to update their toy regulations to consider the implications of anal insertion hazards.
The CPSC desperately needs to update their toy regulations to consider the implications of anal insertion hazards.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,719
@151,712 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
The real victims in all of this are the sexually repressed, intelligent, conscious thinking children that take the decision to have sex, and their partners.
The real victims in all of this are the sexually repressed, intelligent, conscious thinking children that take the decision to have sex, and their partners.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,721
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,723
@151,717 (C)
Of course! Getting rid of age of consent laws will make kit easier to victimize children. Now, CPS steps in when sexual activity with children is suspected, if the laws were changed, they would have to look for lack of consent. How in the hell would you get reliable testimony from a toddler?
Of course! Getting rid of age of consent laws will make kit easier to victimize children. Now, CPS steps in when sexual activity with children is suspected, if the laws were changed, they would have to look for lack of consent. How in the hell would you get reliable testimony from a toddler?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,724
@151,719 (A)
Absolutely. What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?
Absolutely. What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,725
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,727
@151,723 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The 1974 CPS publication “Babyfucking and You†addresses the concerns of reliable testimony and found that sippie cups with apple juice were 9 percent more effective than time outs.
The 1974 CPS publication “Babyfucking and You†addresses the concerns of reliable testimony and found that sippie cups with apple juice were 9 percent more effective than time outs.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,728
Well how about we make it legal for children to have sex with someone in their own age group. Would that satisfy you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,729
@151,724 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?
Not a very pleasant one.
> What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?
Not a very pleasant one.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,730
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,732
@151,725 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Someone can be angry about being turned down for sex no matter the law.
Ending the AoC would mean less persecution for pedos, and not harm children who can still say no.
Someone can be angry about being turned down for sex no matter the law.
Ending the AoC would mean less persecution for pedos, and not harm children who can still say no.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,734
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,735
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,736
inb4 a whole new use for the diaper changing stations in public restrooms
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,737
@151,728 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
You just don't get it. If the child wants to only have sex with other children, that's fine. If the child doesn't want to have sex at all, that's also fine. I think these things should be the decision of the child and not the government.
You just don't get it. If the child wants to only have sex with other children, that's fine. If the child doesn't want to have sex at all, that's also fine. I think these things should be the decision of the child and not the government.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,739
@151,732 (C)
So, this law would not be beneficial for children at all? Just for the pedophiles? Gotcha.
So, this law would not be beneficial for children at all? Just for the pedophiles? Gotcha.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,740
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,741
@151,732 (C)
If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?
If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm double-posted this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,742
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,743
@151,739 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
It would not harm children, and it would give them more of a choice.
It would not harm children, and it would give them more of a choice.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,744
@151,739 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
No age of consent laws would give children much more power and benefit them most.
No age of consent laws would give children much more power and benefit them most.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,746
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,747
Sup To4str
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,748
@151,741 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
The child No means no, and the pedo should not be punished for wanting to stay abstinent for the night.
The child No means no, and the pedo should not be punished for wanting to stay abstinent for the night.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,749
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,750
@151,744 (A)
Explain to me what ways this would benefit children. I want to hear the pros and the cons from you.
Explain to me what ways this would benefit children. I want to hear the pros and the cons from you.
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,751
this thread is why america should elect ron paul.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,752
@151,746 (A)
What if a child starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?
What if a child starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,753
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,754
@151,750 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Quite simply it would give them the right to make decisions for themselves instead of having government do it for them.
Quite simply it would give them the right to make decisions for themselves instead of having government do it for them.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,755
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,756
I want to hear the pros and cons of removing AOC laws.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,757
@151,752 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
What if an adult starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?
What if an adult starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,758
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,760
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,761
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,762
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,763
@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Pro: stops persecuting consensual relationships
con: none, people can still say no
Pro: stops persecuting consensual relationships
con: none, people can still say no
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,764
@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Pros:
- It would give children the freedom to have sex when they think it's appropriate
Cons:
- None.
Pros:
- It would give children the freedom to have sex when they think it's appropriate
Cons:
- None.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,765
This really sounds like it more for the adults benefit than anything else.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,766
@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Pros: freedom
Cons: diaper manufacturers scramble to engineer the optimal semen absorption materials, creating the great depression of 2020 due to inflation
Pros: freedom
Cons: diaper manufacturers scramble to engineer the optimal semen absorption materials, creating the great depression of 2020 due to inflation
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 9 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,767
@151,762 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
It's not up to me or the government to determine who can make good choices.
There are some adults who have sex, get STDs, pregnant, all to someone they do not love. Should that be illegal?
It's not up to me or the government to determine who can make good choices.
There are some adults who have sex, get STDs, pregnant, all to someone they do not love. Should that be illegal?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,768
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,769
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,771
@151,765 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
What's wrong with that? Helping people isn't bad, hurting people is bad.
What's wrong with that? Helping people isn't bad, hurting people is bad.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,772
@151,765 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Come on. Get serious, now. Little girls tell me every day that a well-bruised cervix and some light hair pulling are just the things they need to make it through a hard week at school.
Come on. Get serious, now. Little girls tell me every day that a well-bruised cervix and some light hair pulling are just the things they need to make it through a hard week at school.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,773
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,774
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,775
@151,769 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
So can children.
con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
So can children.
con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,776
pros: durex and trojan come out with a new line 'ribbed for his/her teething pleasure'
cons: to4str quits posting on this board from all of the sweet infant ass he's getting
cons: to4str quits posting on this board from all of the sweet infant ass he's getting
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,777
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,778
@151,775 (C)
But a child couldn't consent to a search by a detective or make their own medical decisions.
But a child couldn't consent to a search by a detective or make their own medical decisions.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,779
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,781
@151,778 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
You really need to understand the difference between consent, and legal recognition of that consent.
You really need to understand the difference between consent, and legal recognition of that consent.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,782
@previous (C)
What if a child asked to be punched in the face? Would the person who hit him be punished?
What if a child asked to be punched in the face? Would the person who hit him be punished?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,783
f—u—c—k   m—e   l—i—k—e   t—h—e   w—h—o—r—e   y—o—u   w—a—n—t   m—e   t—o   b—e(Edited 30 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,784
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,786
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,787
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,789
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,790
@151,787 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He’d understand, gently put the child down for a nap, and then go plow that 7-year-old whom is always giving him the sexy eyes when he’s mowing the lawn.
He’d understand, gently put the child down for a nap, and then go plow that 7-year-old whom is always giving him the sexy eyes when he’s mowing the lawn.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,791
@151,787 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The father could react a number of ways, but the law that is being discussed will not affect it, so it's irrelevant.
The father could react a number of ways, but the law that is being discussed will not affect it, so it's irrelevant.
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,792
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,793
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,794
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
No two fathers are the same.
He could react calmly, or angrily. Either could happen if there was or wasn't an AoC, and they could also happen to his wife.
No two fathers are the same.
He could react calmly, or angrily. Either could happen if there was or wasn't an AoC, and they could also happen to his wife.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,795
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,797
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Perhaps usually, but not always.
Anyway what is your point? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.
Perhaps usually, but not always.
Anyway what is your point? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,798
I'm 25 and almost had sex with a 40-year-old. We were both pretty drunk at the time and I'm glad we didn't do it. It would have been really awkward. She is pretty hot though. You wouldn't think she was a day over 32.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,799
@151,797 (C)
Because age of consent laws were created to stop the widespread victimization of children that is caused by their lack of power and options to leave dangerous situations. The Child labor laws were created for the same reasons.
Because age of consent laws were created to stop the widespread victimization of children that is caused by their lack of power and options to leave dangerous situations. The Child labor laws were created for the same reasons.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,801
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
But child labor laws are about economic oppression of vulnerable persons. This is about the sweet, sweet freedom of loli ass.
But child labor laws are about economic oppression of vulnerable persons. This is about the sweet, sweet freedom of loli ass.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,802
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,803
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,804
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,856
To4str you still look just as fat as you used to, is that why you prey on children? Cos girls your age laugh at your titties!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 40 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,916
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,922
Hey toast, why do child labor laws exist? Can't they consent to working long hours?
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,928
@151,741 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?
I think this was the best post ITT for the whole world system it implies. Pedos married to 8 yo's having normal marital difficulties like a sitcom. lol 10/10 also the disgusting graphicness
> If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?
I think this was the best post ITT for the whole world system it implies. Pedos married to 8 yo's having normal marital difficulties like a sitcom. lol 10/10 also the disgusting graphicness
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,929
@151,922 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Radical statist interventionalists have foisted their flawed policies onto an unwilling populace. It is no accident that the 20th century saw a great decline in personal liberty and economic freedom when these leftists declared children could no longer seek economic gratification with adults.
Radical statist interventionalists have foisted their flawed policies onto an unwilling populace. It is no accident that the 20th century saw a great decline in personal liberty and economic freedom when these leftists declared children could no longer seek economic gratification with adults.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,930
@151,928 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
I’m flattered that you of all people would recognize my finest writings to date.
I’m flattered that you of all people would recognize my finest writings to date.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,931
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,949
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,981
How do you feel about child labor laws?
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,992
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,995
@previous (C)
Should they be repealed? Are they necessary? Why were they created? Do they hurt or help children?
Should they be repealed? Are they necessary? Why were they created? Do they hurt or help children?
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,012
Only mc could turn a thread about sex with old people into a thread about sex with young people
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,020
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,024
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,028
pic relatedAnonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,029
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,057
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,060
@152,024 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I agree that contracts made by minors should be considered binding.
I agree that contracts made by minors should be considered binding.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,063
@152,057 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
What "feelings"? If the topic is about having sex with people much older than you, then you must be much younger than them, hence it's "two sides of the same coin."
What "feelings"? If the topic is about having sex with people much older than you, then you must be much younger than them, hence it's "two sides of the same coin."
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,070
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo
You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,082
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
That's not what I said, dipshit. All I said was that it's two sides to the same coin because if I'm 25 and the woman I'm fucking is 40 then to me it's sex with an older woman but for her it's sex with a younger man. Talking about having sex with someone twice your age means that the other person in the equation is having sex with someone half their age. That doesn't automatically mean we're talking about pedophilia.
That's not what I said, dipshit. All I said was that it's two sides to the same coin because if I'm 25 and the woman I'm fucking is 40 then to me it's sex with an older woman but for her it's sex with a younger man. Talking about having sex with someone twice your age means that the other person in the equation is having sex with someone half their age. That doesn't automatically mean we're talking about pedophilia.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,085
Anonymous C double-posted this 15 years ago, 34 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,087
Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,088
Ron Paul is older then Thee & eye am older then God herself.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,090
@previous (Syntax)
Does it make you feel weird that you're at the very least 40 years older than anyone else on this forum?
Does it make you feel weird that you're at the very least 40 years older than anyone else on this forum?
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,107
Yikes how did eye get 2b nonnymouse?
Syntax here!!
@previous (Q)
Of course not. However a recent poll on ages has you off base re "anyone else" Yes many are preteens still living in mommies basement. Then again you and eye know someone who runs a forum (no need to give him publicity) and he is at deaths door at just about 40.
And consider a fact no one here can deny. Itamake who is a mere 20 recently had a heart attack!!!
My innards r in much better shape then most preteens here, however no doubt my face is melting off re amount of sun exposure.
Also and this is the best part - I do not have to rely on lefty or righty for you know what lolol
Syntax here!!
@previous (Q)
Of course not. However a recent poll on ages has you off base re "anyone else" Yes many are preteens still living in mommies basement. Then again you and eye know someone who runs a forum (no need to give him publicity) and he is at deaths door at just about 40.
And consider a fact no one here can deny. Itamake who is a mere 20 recently had a heart attack!!!
My innards r in much better shape then most preteens here, however no doubt my face is melting off re amount of sun exposure.
Also and this is the best part - I do not have to rely on lefty or righty for you know what lolol
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,110
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,111
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,115
ltamake !3vZ7A06glM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,149
sup to4str
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,160
!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,162
Oops, I originally read that as half your age. I guess what I says still applies though.
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,163
@152,160 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Yaza
The board game Monopoly works more better if one uses Monto Carlo with Markov. Now if if you take ones initial Beliefs + Recent Objective Data = A New and Improved Belief one wins everytyme unless your opponent is running the same theorem.
Eye recently found that in the real world of real monopoly this scheme has holes.
Yaza
The board game Monopoly works more better if one uses Monto Carlo with Markov. Now if if you take ones initial Beliefs + Recent Objective Data = A New and Improved Belief one wins everytyme unless your opponent is running the same theorem.
Eye recently found that in the real world of real monopoly this scheme has holes.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,168
hamfist !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,180
I'll probably end up fucking cougars at a bar like a pathetic fuck when I grow up
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,190
hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,207
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,209
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,210
hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,212
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,220
Back when I was about 18 and dating one very sweet blonde her mom came on to me. MoM was even more lovely then daughter. I regret not taking her up on offer.
Now not one chance in HELL eye wood think of getting nakkid with some gal older then Me lol
I did hang/date/make/love with a woman older then me by maybe one decade. She hid her age from me so I will never know.
Way she worked out daily kept her body is fyne fyne shape!!
Now not one chance in HELL eye wood think of getting nakkid with some gal older then Me lol
I did hang/date/make/love with a woman older then me by maybe one decade. She hid her age from me so I will never know.
Way she worked out daily kept her body is fyne fyne shape!!
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,276
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,279
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos triple-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,280
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,365
@152,070 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
@152,070 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
> You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo
This coming from the man who is "in love" with a 14 year old girl?
@152,070 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
> You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo
This coming from the man who is "in love" with a 14 year old girl?
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,366
Anonymous V replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,367
@151,575 (A)
> I see the face of God in every child.
Are you fucking stupid? Don't you know that there's no such thing as God?
> I see the face of God in every child.
Are you fucking stupid? Don't you know that there's no such thing as God?
Anonymous V double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,368
@151,605 (A)
> Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man)
Maybe In your fantasies.
> Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man)
Maybe In your fantasies.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,369
Anonymous V replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,374
People here (including OP)believe in the concept of "Childhood innocence."
The problem with "childhood innocence".
The principal defect of this concept is that it implies that sexuality is a "sin", and that children are "innocent" because they have not as yet indulged in this "sin". The singularly Christian notion of "childhood innocence" is a vestige of our anti-sexual heritage which reached a high point, in many aspects, in the Victorian era. Its origin can be traced to the 1700s. It is a highly irrational notion, and I need not attempt to refute it. For the burden of proof is not on the Author, that sexuality is a sin. I have yet to see an argument that sexuality is a sin, and hence have nothing to refute. I have only come across dogmatic assertions, mainly in the form of religion, of the sinfulness of sexuality and "childhood innocence" (which is implicit in the notion of the sinfulness of sexuality).
The problem with "childhood innocence".
The principal defect of this concept is that it implies that sexuality is a "sin", and that children are "innocent" because they have not as yet indulged in this "sin". The singularly Christian notion of "childhood innocence" is a vestige of our anti-sexual heritage which reached a high point, in many aspects, in the Victorian era. Its origin can be traced to the 1700s. It is a highly irrational notion, and I need not attempt to refute it. For the burden of proof is not on the Author, that sexuality is a sin. I have yet to see an argument that sexuality is a sin, and hence have nothing to refute. I have only come across dogmatic assertions, mainly in the form of religion, of the sinfulness of sexuality and "childhood innocence" (which is implicit in the notion of the sinfulness of sexuality).
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,380
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,397
Anonymous V replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,399
@152,369 (A)
I seriously doubt an 11 year old would want to have sex with a man who is almost 20 years old.
Why would a 5th-6th grader want to have sex with a man almost 20 years old.?
I seriously doubt an 11 year old would want to have sex with a man who is almost 20 years old.
Why would a 5th-6th grader want to have sex with a man almost 20 years old.?
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,406
@previous (V)
I wanted to fuck many many women much older when I was younger.
You need to think back to when you were a kid. Kids aren't any less capable of understanding things than adults. It is the lack of experiences they have to compare to know the most correct course of action.
I wanted to fuck many many women much older when I was younger.
You need to think back to when you were a kid. Kids aren't any less capable of understanding things than adults. It is the lack of experiences they have to compare to know the most correct course of action.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,412
@previous (!JuMPb0dbaE)
This. I distinctly remember fantasizing about having sex with ~30s woman when I was in grade 11 or 12. I just didn't interact with many lol
This. I distinctly remember fantasizing about having sex with ~30s woman when I was in grade 11 or 12. I just didn't interact with many lol
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,795
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,797
@152,406 (!JuMPb0dbaE)
I believe that they are less able to understand the consequences of their actions.
I believe that they are less able to understand the consequences of their actions.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B triple-posted this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,020
MM? Child labor laws?
Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,029
Last night, my father had a nightmare. Honestly, it was more of a night-terror. His doctor had warned us this may happen from time to time. The accident was pretty severe, and he came out of it a bit less than okay. It was the first time I had cried in a long time. To see him like this hurt me. It hurt my heart. I knew my father well. I knew how bull-headed and pushy he seemed at times to the untrained eye. But when you got to know him, when he really trusted you, you saw that side of him. The side that just wanted to be a strong-willed man. I have often times wondered if he decided to only leave the drinking problem to me and held out on that quality. I don't think my father saw a lot of himself in me. I really didn't see a lot of myself in him. Still, I think we made our peace that night. I knew he didn't want to leave this world in that state; thrashing and flailing in a cold panic. My father passed peacefully, and with dignity last night. I smothered him in his sleep with a five pound marshmallow.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,030
Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,034
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He tried to relate to me. A little. Honestly, it was the most I ever saw him commit to something I knew he didn't like or understand. Perhaps I didn't devote enough time to what HE wanted. I suppose I'll ask myself this question for the rest of my life. This is my burden now. I'll find a way to deal with it. Perhaps one day I'll have a son of my own and we'll click. Perhaps not. I hope so because this pain is more than I think I can deal with.
He tried to relate to me. A little. Honestly, it was the most I ever saw him commit to something I knew he didn't like or understand. Perhaps I didn't devote enough time to what HE wanted. I suppose I'll ask myself this question for the rest of my life. This is my burden now. I'll find a way to deal with it. Perhaps one day I'll have a son of my own and we'll click. Perhaps not. I hope so because this pain is more than I think I can deal with.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,040
@152,795 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I don't really know enough about child labor laws to comment on them.
I don't really know enough about child labor laws to comment on them.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,045
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,065
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,088
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,091
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,092
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,096
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
You said that you know nothing about AoC laws so how can you know that they is less to them?
You said that you know nothing about AoC laws so how can you know that they is less to them?
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #155,346
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)