Topic: favourite iso standard draad

Mrs.Kate Gerard started this discussion 7 years ago #86,206

whats ur favourite iso standard mine is 216

The Autist !lVcIUJu16M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 32 minutes later[^] [v] #987,356

183.4

tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,359

8601!

Mrs.Kate Gerard (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,361

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
How so??

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,362

@previous (Mrs.Kate Gerard)
YYYY-MM-DD

ask any programmer ?

Mrs.Kate Gerard (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,363

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Yes I know what it is (after googling it) but why is it your fav standard

tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 7 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,364

@previous (Mrs.Kate Gerard)
the other standards are boring and suck

i encounter 8601 every single working day

9001 too (which is funny b/c the meme number lmao haha :DDDDDDD but meh)

Mrs.Kate Gerard (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #987,365

@previous (tteh !MemesToDNA)
My problem with 8601 is that 'most significant' is context dependent. Eg if I want to sort through a file cabinet yymmdd is best but if I want to look up what day it is dd suddenly becomes more significant!

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,413

200 ISO because it provides the best quality in daylight, for indoor adventures I prefer a 400 ISO because it provides an increase in light sensitivity but without the large amount of grain that higher ISO films give.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,414

I have no clue what's going on here

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,456

@987,413 (D)
I usually shot 120 ISO!

Ben Johnson joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,515

@987,414 (E)
some people really camera around people talk crazy internet stuff

Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,565

@987,456 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)

You're such a bright spark you would overexpose if you went higher!

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,612

Can anyone explain any of this thread to me? Thanks.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,614

4217 thanks

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 7 years ago, 45 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,621

@987,565 (D)
:')

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 32 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #987,628

98.7% is preferable

Mrs.Kate Gerard (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #987,807

@987,612 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
are you not familiar with the concept of ISO standards

Minichan