Topic: Who are the pedophiles of this forum?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #8,611
to4str and...?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #151,082
toaster
jump
mountain man
homestar
OP
jump
mountain man
homestar
OP
!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 58 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,084
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,088
Leo
Dm
Psychopath
Dm
Psychopath
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,090
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,095
Sim
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,097
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,102
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,109
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,110
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,112
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,113
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,114
@151,112 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> Leo just likes to joke around. It's his schtick. I doubt he'd touch any girl under 21.
> I doubt he'd touch any girl under 21
> doubt
> under 21
Yeah
> Leo just likes to joke around. It's his schtick. I doubt he'd touch any girl under 21.
> I doubt he'd touch any girl under 21
> doubt
> under 21
Yeah
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ double-posted this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,115
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,116
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,117
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,119
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,121
Jump
Mountainman
Homestar
Dutchfag/Voice of !WisdomHsuU/Psychopath
to4str
Mountainman
Homestar
Dutchfag/Voice of !WisdomHsuU/Psychopath
to4str
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,122
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,124
@151,119 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
> >implying she;'s a bitch
> She's just a terrible moderator.
But she is hot and I probably would touch her.
> >implying she;'s a bitch
> She's just a terrible moderator.
But she is hot and I probably would touch her.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,131
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,136
im a hebephile at worst!
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,138
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,141
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,149
I don't really identify with that label either...
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,155
ltamake !3vZ7A06glM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,160
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,171
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,172
Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 52 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,189
Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,190
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,207
Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,210
hamfist !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,341
> name hasn't been mentionedAnonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,386
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,593
Homestar and jump are nice people, though. The rest can eat shit and die.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,603
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,821
Apart from T04str (who apparently has a conviction against his name), is there any legal evidence that any of the others are actual pedophiles as opposed to basement-dwelling trolls indulging their shit-tier faggotry?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,830
@previous (Q)
Many of them have talked about their attraction to children, but it's not like anyone has pictures of crimes happening.
Many of them have talked about their attraction to children, but it's not like anyone has pictures of crimes happening.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,847
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
So - no arrests, no warrents, no criminal records, no registration or even witness statements? In short, just a bunch of ghey fucktards trying tolook edgy and hardcore stir up shit on the board.
So - no arrests, no warrents, no criminal records, no registration or even witness statements? In short, just a bunch of ghey fucktards trying to
(Edited 51 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,848
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,853
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Yes, obviously pedophiles exist. But how can we know for certain that the trollfaggots mentioned above are real pedocunts?
Yes, obviously pedophiles exist. But how can we know for certain that the trollfaggots mentioned above are real pedocunts?
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,854
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,855
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,860
@151,853 (Q)
How can we know anyone here who claims to be gay actually is until we see a picture of them taking a dick up the ass?
How can we know anyone here who claims to be gay actually is until we see a picture of them taking a dick up the ass?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,863
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,869
@151,860 (E)
Exactly the point I'm making. We don't know. Thank you for confirming the truth of the matter.
Exactly the point I'm making. We don't know. Thank you for confirming the truth of the matter.
Anonymous Q double-posted this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,871
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,878
@151,869 (Q)
I demand you post legal evidence, RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW, that you aren't a psychotic troll.
I demand you post legal evidence, RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW, that you aren't a psychotic troll.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,882
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,885
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,893
@151,878 (E)
Sorry, but it's impossible to post evidence of a negative. That's like asking you to provide legal evidence of the non-existence of the Judeo-Christian God.
Sorry, but it's impossible to post evidence of a negative. That's like asking you to provide legal evidence of the non-existence of the Judeo-Christian God.
Anonymous E replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,896
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,901
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,908
pedophile ≠child molester
there can be no "proof" of pedophilia
there can be no "proof" of pedophilia
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,936
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Actually, the legal definition of pedophile is child molester, due to the offender being convicted after the crime. From the court's perspective, the proof refers to the physical evidence of the sexual assault/rape, and the offender is a pedophile under the legal definition.
As for the psychological definition, there are various tests a qualified psychologist can use to determine the subject's true sexual preferences. However, it also goes without saying that nobody here has the professional training or experience necessary to label anyone a pedophile.
Actually, the legal definition of pedophile is child molester, due to the offender being convicted after the crime. From the court's perspective, the proof refers to the physical evidence of the sexual assault/rape, and the offender is a pedophile under the legal definition.
As for the psychological definition, there are various tests a qualified psychologist can use to determine the subject's true sexual preferences. However, it also goes without saying that nobody here has the professional training or experience necessary to label anyone a pedophile.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,940
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,944
@151,936 (Q)
Yes, the legal definition of homosexuality was wrong too. One can be a homosexual virgin.
Is not the psychological definition concerning a metal illness that they call pedophilia? Once, again this is incorrect, just as calling homosexuality a mental disorder.
"Child lover" is THE definition of pedophile. That is what the word means.
Yes, the legal definition of homosexuality was wrong too. One can be a homosexual virgin.
Is not the psychological definition concerning a metal illness that they call pedophilia? Once, again this is incorrect, just as calling homosexuality a mental disorder.
"Child lover" is THE definition of pedophile. That is what the word means.
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,956
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
I'm just stating the legal and psychological definitions, MM; I'm not saying they're right. I'll leave that up to the Professional communities to determine.
I'm just stating the legal and psychological definitions, MM; I'm not saying they're right. I'll leave that up to the Professional communities to determine.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,960
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,973
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Actually, it is, MM. The Supreme Court has the power to decide what is right or wrong from a legal perspective and the Mental Heath Community (headed by professionals) determines the difference between social and anti-social behavior. I'm not saying I concur with their decisions one way or the other, but that's how the system works at this time.
Actually, it is, MM. The Supreme Court has the power to decide what is right or wrong from a legal perspective and the Mental Heath Community (headed by professionals) determines the difference between social and anti-social behavior. I'm not saying I concur with their decisions one way or the other, but that's how the system works at this time.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,974
@previous (Q)
But libertarianism is a flawless construct that demonstrates it is right through unblemished morality.
But libertarianism is a flawless construct that demonstrates it is right through unblemished morality.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,980
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,985
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,988
@previous (Q)
I've already drawn the correct conclusion, TGComix. Now go jerk off to your subversive feminist loli porn.
I've already drawn the correct conclusion, TGComix. Now go jerk off to your subversive feminist loli porn.
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,990
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,993
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 45 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,009
@151,973 (Q)
Lolno
Supreme court interprets the law - completely irrelevant to any incorrect use of the word pedophilia etc in laws and acts etc
MHC does not determine the difference but categorizes and prescribes treatment for these differences.
Lolno
Supreme court interprets the law - completely irrelevant to any incorrect use of the word pedophilia etc in laws and acts etc
MHC does not determine the difference but categorizes and prescribes treatment for these differences.
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,036
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Sorry MM, but I disagree. The Supreme Court has the power to strike down laws they deem unconstitutional or which circumvent the course of justice. No state or federal political entity can countermand their decisions, not even the Oval Office. Thus far, they haven't seen fit to alter or strike down the existing legal definitions of "pedophile", "pedophilia" or related terminolgy which intersects with statutory rape and/or child sexual assault.
Still, I'm curious about your remark regarding who determines right or wrong. If these concepts aren't determined by professionals and lawmakers, who do you believe makes the final decision?
Sorry MM, but I disagree. The Supreme Court has the power to strike down laws they deem unconstitutional or which circumvent the course of justice. No state or federal political entity can countermand their decisions, not even the Oval Office. Thus far, they haven't seen fit to alter or strike down the existing legal definitions of "pedophile", "pedophilia" or related terminolgy which intersects with statutory rape and/or child sexual assault.
Still, I'm curious about your remark regarding who determines right or wrong. If these concepts aren't determined by professionals and lawmakers, who do you believe makes the final decision?
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,054
@previous (Q)
Yes because they are interpreting the constitution, which is their power. They can not strike down laws which "circumvent the course of justice". They can not alter those definitions, because, as I have just said that has nothing to do with interpreting the law.
Right and wrong is either universal or individual. It is never determined for you by others though.
Yes because they are interpreting the constitution, which is their power. They can not strike down laws which "circumvent the course of justice". They can not alter those definitions, because, as I have just said that has nothing to do with interpreting the law.
Right and wrong is either universal or individual. It is never determined for you by others though.
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,061
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
> Right and wrong is either universal or individual. It is never determined for you by others though.
Could you explain this in more detail?
> Right and wrong is either universal or individual. It is never determined for you by others though.
Could you explain this in more detail?
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,066
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,101
Freecode !!4IKKtS9GG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,146
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,174
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,197
@151,936 (Q)
I think I can say wether I find 9 year olds attractive or not. I don't, but if I did I would be able to tell.
I mean, if I were, I w
I think I can say wether I find 9 year olds attractive or not. I don't, but if I did I would be able to tell.
I mean, if I were, I w
!JuMPb0dbaE double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,199
@151,936 (Q)
I think I can say wether I find 9 year olds attractive or not. I don't, but if I did I would be able to tell.
I think I can say wether I find 9 year olds attractive or not. I don't, but if I did I would be able to tell.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,281
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,282
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos triple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,283
!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,317
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,321
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,328
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,329
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,330
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
LOl you are so gay. I'm drunk and Laying in bed. What time tomorrow?
LOl you are so gay. I'm drunk and Laying in bed. What time tomorrow?
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,333
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,370
@151,821 (Q)
> Apart from T04str (who apparently has a conviction against his name), is there any legal evidence that any of the others are actual pedophiles as opposed to basement-dwelling trolls indulging their shit-tier faggotry?
What did T04str do?
> Apart from T04str (who apparently has a conviction against his name), is there any legal evidence that any of the others are actual pedophiles as opposed to basement-dwelling trolls indulging their shit-tier faggotry?
What did T04str do?
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,371
Ya know, MM posting as Ron Paul has almost made me hate Ron Paul
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,379
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,381
@152,370 (X)
According to his own account, he was busted for uploading nude pics of himself while he was underaged. Unconfirmed whether this is true or just another one of his attention-grabbing ploys.
According to his own account, he was busted for uploading nude pics of himself while he was underaged. Unconfirmed whether this is true or just another one of his attention-grabbing ploys.
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk replied with this 15 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,414
@152,379 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Because of the useless shit you post. I'm beginning to think those are HIS opinions.
Because of the useless shit you post. I'm beginning to think those are HIS opinions.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,416
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,441
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,450
[^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,461
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
@152,441 ([^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk)
> Every post
I mean, I shit post. But i don't have the name of someone identifiable, besides a bot on rizon's irc network
@152,441 ([^_^] !IOdbnXsKDk)
> Every post
I mean, I shit post. But i don't have the name of someone identifiable, besides a bot on rizon's irc network
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,655
Hamfist might have an issue there, but I'm not going to point fingers on a whim.
Anonymous Z-3 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #153,560
