Topic: Curvy
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #8,533
<--- CurvyAnonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #149,479
Not really the traditional definition of curvy.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,489
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,491
@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
I dunno, I always thought a "curvy" woman was a little chunky with huge boobs and hips. I don't think a thin woman with an hourglass figure is necessarily curvy.
I dunno, I always thought a "curvy" woman was a little chunky with huge boobs and hips. I don't think a thin woman with an hourglass figure is necessarily curvy.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,492
curvy bodies are fucking sexy.dachan-da joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,493
Please give me a goddamn curry.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,494
dachan-da replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,499
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #149,501
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #149,575
@149,491 (B)
Hourglass figure is curvy. Think about it, the hourglass is the definition of curves.
But fat chicks say "curvy" because it sounds better than "round", and give curvy a bad name.
Hourglass figure is curvy. Think about it, the hourglass is the definition of curves.
But fat chicks say "curvy" because it sounds better than "round", and give curvy a bad name.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #149,577
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,606
@OP
Nah, she's just fat.
Nah, she's just fat.
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,613
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,614
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,615
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,616
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,736
<--- CurvyAnonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,739
dachan-da replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,740
Where's my goddamn curry?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,742
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,743
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,858
I prefer pencils
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,901
swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,902
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 28 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #149,903
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #150,261
@149,902 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Not necessarily adolescents and that is very rude towards small framed women. Who are you to decide what a normal level of "development" is and then tell them they are less than normal?
Not necessarily adolescents and that is very rude towards small framed women. Who are you to decide what a normal level of "development" is and then tell them they are less than normal?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #150,297
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
I really thought that you were referring to children. Isn't that an easy mistake to make with you? I don't think that lean women are less normal.
I really thought that you were referring to children. Isn't that an easy mistake to make with you? I don't think that lean women are less normal.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #150,309
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #150,321
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #150,335
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Yes it is an easy mistake. You are a pedophile and you said that you were attracted to pencils, which are females who are flat chested.
Yes it is an easy mistake. You are a pedophile and you said that you were attracted to pencils, which are females who are flat chested.