Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later[^][v]#976,783
Rules of Eu cast in stone, say no one who leaves can come back.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 43 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#976,795
it's like when that lady rejected God in that movie and she was separated from heaven and her daughter for eternity thereafter
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#976,798
@976,783 (B)
Did you read that off a fortune cookie?
MR STEVEN MNUCHIN joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#976,837
@976,783 (B)
The EU has explicitly stated the UK can rejoin
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 29 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#976,842
Leaving the EU on March 29th will satisfy 52% of voters and anger 48% of voters. Cancelling Brexit now will satisfy 48% of voters and (massively, to the point of civil unrest) anger 52% of voters.
Leaving the EU only to them immediately re-enter will anger 100% of voters. The Brexit crowd will feel betrayed (rightfully so, even though they are ill-informed morons) and the Remainers will ask why Britain has spent hundreds of billions of pounds and already lost huge amounts of business to other countries, just to rejoin an alliance they didn't have to leave in the first place.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#976,874
@976,837 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
Not impossible, NOT Probable!
If Britain ever sought to rejoin the EU, it could not be on the terms of membership the country previously enjoyed. The UK’s budget rebate, exemption from Schengen and opt-outs from the euro and judicial cooperation will not be on the table again. This would make rejoining a difficult sell to the British public.
A curiosity of the Brexit saga has been the steadfast belief in the sanctity of the referendum result. Despite the ambiguous constitutional status of referenda in the UK and the narrowness of the vote, the main political parties fall over each other to “respect the verdict of the people”. Individual Members of Parliament are too worried about upsetting their constituents to insist that the principle of representative democracy should give them the final say.
Many Remainers cling to the hope that it will all prove to be disastrous, the country will return to its senses, and seek to rejoin the EU sooner rather than later. However, one dimension of this scenario has received surprisingly little attention: the terms of membership the UK currently has are very unlikely to be on offer in future.
MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#976,875
@previous (B)
you are already contradicting yourself lol
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#976,879
@previous (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
Never said I was in the running to be Jesus Christs replacement. Plus they hung Jesus out to dry.
After looking up what it takes to get voted in2 the Eu, very very difficult as you well no. We here in USA of course have items like Puerto Rico, that want to be voted in as USA state and Even a plot of land you may not be familiar with called Washington DC. D.C. residents have no representation in the United States Senate, 2nd class citizens.