Topic: Why do they Call it 'Planned Parenthood'..
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #84,540
They're all about abortion..
Sick..
Sick..
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #971,247
Use your head and you'll figure it out
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 54 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #971,248
Bert's mom should have swallowed.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 47 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #971,250
Nasty is
as nasty does..
as nasty does..
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #971,256
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #971,260
jackie_martling.png
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #971,261
They also provide prophylactics
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #971,264
You plan to do something with the girl you knocked up!Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #971,265
They provide contraceptives, STD screening, pregnancy advice, sexual health care generally, and a lot of other valuable services.
They provide adoption and prenatal care services. Abortion is like 10% of what they do. And abortion is fine anyway. People in America are r-worded about sex.
They provide adoption and prenatal care services. Abortion is like 10% of what they do. And abortion is fine anyway. People in America are r-worded about sex.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,269
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I think that theve admitted that it's more than 10 per cent, but Im pro abortion anyway
I think that theve admitted that it's more than 10 per cent, but Im pro abortion anyway
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,270
@971,265 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
In all fairness that's a bit like saying Starbucks isn't JUST a coffeehouse because they sell bottled water and tea too.
(just fucking with you there but it's what immediately popped into my head)
In all fairness that's a bit like saying Starbucks isn't JUST a coffeehouse because they sell bottled water and tea too.
(just fucking with you there but it's what immediately popped into my head)
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,272
@971,269 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
A lot of it depends on how you cut the numbers, but it's not more than 20% from any estimate I've seen anywhere. It's certainly nowhere near a majority of their money. It's just overblown.
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
They aren't JUST a coffee house and haven't been for a while. They aim to be a "third place", i.e. the place you spend most of your time besides school/work and home. That being said they are known as a store whose main attraction/selling point is the coffee.
A lot of it depends on how you cut the numbers, but it's not more than 20% from any estimate I've seen anywhere. It's certainly nowhere near a majority of their money. It's just overblown.
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
They aren't JUST a coffee house and haven't been for a while. They aim to be a "third place", i.e. the place you spend most of your time besides school/work and home. That being said they are known as a store whose main attraction/selling point is the coffee.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,273
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I think I would legit kill myself if I had to spend more than about 1 hour a year at Starbucks
I think I would legit kill myself if I had to spend more than about 1 hour a year at Starbucks
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,274
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The only time I'm in a starbucks is if I'm waiting for a friend/job interview, or I need to take a shit urgently in public. They suck and are overpriced and I don't drink coffee anyway. It's definitely not for me either.
The only time I'm in a starbucks is if I'm waiting for a friend/job interview, or I need to take a shit urgently in public. They suck and are overpriced and I don't drink coffee anyway. It's definitely not for me either.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,275
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Do you drink caffeine at all?
I think sometimes I should get off the caffeine.
Do you drink caffeine at all?
I think sometimes I should get off the caffeine.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,276
@971,274 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I used to occasionally meet friends there when i had friends who liked starbucks. A regular coffee doesn't cost much more than at Tim Hortons and Timmys has been shit since an American company bought it.
I used to occasionally meet friends there when i had friends who liked starbucks. A regular coffee doesn't cost much more than at Tim Hortons and Timmys has been shit since an American company bought it.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,280
@971,275 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Once like every two months I'll have a coke. Otherwise no. I drink like 80% water, 15% orange juice, 5% decaf tea. I don't do DRUGS.
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
That's fair. I have a lot of friends who like it too, it's just not somewhere I ever really feel like I need to be.
Sorry for my country destroying your sacred national business. I will pray for them.
Once like every two months I'll have a coke. Otherwise no. I drink like 80% water, 15% orange juice, 5% decaf tea. I don't do DRUGS.
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
That's fair. I have a lot of friends who like it too, it's just not somewhere I ever really feel like I need to be.
Sorry for my country destroying your sacred national business. I will pray for them.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,281
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yeah its not really my vibe and i havent been there in a few years
Yeah its not really my vibe and i havent been there in a few years
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,287
Use your noodle. It is called "Planned Parenthood" because if you're getting an abortion you clearly didn't plan to have the child. They also do more than just abortions as they also help same-sex couples adopt children. Why do you hate orphans and abandoned children, OPenis?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 52 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,297
The name is credited to famed advertising legend Albert Lasker (who was Republican, by the way). He also promoted the use of oranges for squeezing to make juice to give a huge boost to the orange business, and convinced schools to teach about menstruation and so helping Kotex sell those period pad things.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,298
So...even though Planned Parenthood provides a lot of services like pap smears and condoms and treatments for syphilis...it is ok that they killed 328,348 babies last year..
OH GOD THERES A SCHOOL SHOOTING WHERE 12 PRECIOUS CHILDREN WERE KILLED....OH FUCK ITS A TRAGEDY...OMG...HOW AWFUL..
328,348..
OH GOD THERES A SCHOOL SHOOTING WHERE 12 PRECIOUS CHILDREN WERE KILLED....OH FUCK ITS A TRAGEDY...OMG...HOW AWFUL..
328,348..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,300
328,348
That's almost a thousand babies a day for a whole year...and the numbers the last few years are down a it so it's been more per day than that a lot of years previous..
I'm not exactly freaking out about it...but is this kind of thing 'great'...shouldnt something be done to eliminate this method of how society moves along..
That's almost a thousand babies a day for a whole year...and the numbers the last few years are down a it so it's been more per day than that a lot of years previous..
I'm not exactly freaking out about it...but is this kind of thing 'great'...shouldnt something be done to eliminate this method of how society moves along..
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,303
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,305
Go look in the mirror and ask yourself if you are the sort to be telling anyone that..
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,306
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,310
@971,275 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> I think sometimes I should get off the caffeine.
Man, first you quit drinking and now this. I don't know what to think. If you get the urge to start going door-to-door offering people another testament of Jesus Christ, give us the heads up.
> I think sometimes I should get off the caffeine.
Man, first you quit drinking and now this. I don't know what to think. If you get the urge to start going door-to-door offering people another testament of Jesus Christ, give us the heads up.
MR STEVEN MNUCHIN joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,341
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 59 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,344
@previous (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
> Because terminating an early pregnancy does not exclude you from having a child later in life
(Disclaimer: Above does not necessarily cover procedures performed by non-medical personnel using various household implements)
> Because terminating an early pregnancy does not exclude you from having a child later in life
(Disclaimer: Above does not necessarily cover procedures performed by non-medical personnel using various household implements)
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,349
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,364
BERT shame on Ya.
Cathy says
> Why do you hate orphans and abandoned children
You must admit YOU are not supporting kids born without parents - When have you lifted one finger in $$ Support of abandoned babies.
Not only does the US Constitution allow Abortions - So does Your God and his illegitimate son Jesus. They are Fully in Support of Abortions.
If one day the Racist RepublicShit party finds a way to outlaw abortions - All it will do is increase the sales of Wire coat hangers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_abortion
Cathy says
> Why do you hate orphans and abandoned children
You must admit YOU are not supporting kids born without parents - When have you lifted one finger in $$ Support of abandoned babies.
Not only does the US Constitution allow Abortions - So does Your God and his illegitimate son Jesus. They are Fully in Support of Abortions.
If one day the Racist RepublicShit party finds a way to outlaw abortions - All it will do is increase the sales of Wire coat hangers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_abortion
John joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,366
@previous (Syntax)
> Racist RepublicShit party
Fuck you, I'm Republican and I'm not fucking racist.
And brush up on your fucking history, it was Republicans who freed the fucking slaves, while you fucking democraps tried to keep it going. Who's fucking racist now bitch?
> Racist RepublicShit party
Fuck you, I'm Republican and I'm not fucking racist.
And brush up on your fucking history, it was Republicans who freed the fucking slaves, while you fucking democraps tried to keep it going. Who's fucking racist now bitch?
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,370
@previous (John)
Your leader the Pussy Grabbing President Trump endorsed the White Nationalist Party and the Nazi's - He said they were good people
And as to Slaves - Trump must have stock in Wire Coat Hanger companies because he is endorsing their use with no alternative - Makes Women Slaves to Wire Coat Hangers in future.
And as a Republican You yes You endorsed the ripping of babies and children away from Moms at the border - U make babies slaves of ICE border agents -
Oh on occasion I do vote for a Republican IF they are the more better person.
So John tell me R U Pro or Again Abortion. R U Pro Womens rites or against
Your leader the Pussy Grabbing President Trump endorsed the White Nationalist Party and the Nazi's - He said they were good people
And as to Slaves - Trump must have stock in Wire Coat Hanger companies because he is endorsing their use with no alternative - Makes Women Slaves to Wire Coat Hangers in future.
And as a Republican You yes You endorsed the ripping of babies and children away from Moms at the border - U make babies slaves of ICE border agents -
Oh on occasion I do vote for a Republican IF they are the more better person.
So John tell me R U Pro or Again Abortion. R U Pro Womens rites or against
Anonymous O replied with this 7 years ago, 47 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,380
@previous (Syntax)
> Your leader the Pussy Grabbing President Trump
At least he's grabbing pussy while you grab a handful of depends.
> endorsed the White Nationalist Party and the Nazi's - He said they were good people
You support illegals coming over and destroying lives with their shit drugs. And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
> And as to Slaves - Trump must have stock in Wire Coat Hanger companies because he is endorsing their use with no alternative - Makes Women Slaves to Wire Coat Hangers in future.
At which point in this thread did I mention women? I was referring to black slaves, which I bet you had back in the day, and were mighty upset when you had to free them. Please try again.
> And as a Republican You yes You endorsed the ripping of babies and children away from Moms at the border - U make babies slaves of ICE border agents -
You know, you're funny, not funny haha, but funny stupid. You automatically assumed that just because I'm Republican, I'm a Trump supporter. NEWS FLASH: not all Republicans support Trump. But Trump is a better candidate than that murdering cunt Killary you wanted to win. But, no, I think ripping the babies from the Mexicans is wrong. Buuuuuuutttt, they need to be crossing over LEGALLY(I know this is a hard word for you democraps to understand), and stop crying when they get caught doing it illegally.
> Oh on occasion I do vote for a Republican IF they are the more better person.
Don't pretend you vote for a Republican to try to win. You vote all democraps, and your stupidity proves it.
> So John tell me R U Pro or Again Abortion. R U Pro Womens rites or against
It's funny you avoided my entire thread about slaves, and add shit to try and help you win your argument.
But to answer your last 2 questions, I am 100% against abortion, but but but, I do have few exceptions when abortion should be ok.
And and and, women should have just as much rites as men.
Now, since you are so open to illegals flooding the country illegally, why have you, yes you, not opened your home to them? Why havent you, yes you, offered them a job to maintain the landscape of your "multiple properties" that you, yes you, claim to own? And finally, why aren't you, yes you, down at the border protesting the way these "poor Mexicans" are being treated?
> Your leader the Pussy Grabbing President Trump
At least he's grabbing pussy while you grab a handful of depends.
> endorsed the White Nationalist Party and the Nazi's - He said they were good people
You support illegals coming over and destroying lives with their shit drugs. And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
> And as to Slaves - Trump must have stock in Wire Coat Hanger companies because he is endorsing their use with no alternative - Makes Women Slaves to Wire Coat Hangers in future.
At which point in this thread did I mention women? I was referring to black slaves, which I bet you had back in the day, and were mighty upset when you had to free them. Please try again.
> And as a Republican You yes You endorsed the ripping of babies and children away from Moms at the border - U make babies slaves of ICE border agents -
You know, you're funny, not funny haha, but funny stupid. You automatically assumed that just because I'm Republican, I'm a Trump supporter. NEWS FLASH: not all Republicans support Trump. But Trump is a better candidate than that murdering cunt Killary you wanted to win. But, no, I think ripping the babies from the Mexicans is wrong. Buuuuuuutttt, they need to be crossing over LEGALLY(I know this is a hard word for you democraps to understand), and stop crying when they get caught doing it illegally.
> Oh on occasion I do vote for a Republican IF they are the more better person.
Don't pretend you vote for a Republican to try to win. You vote all democraps, and your stupidity proves it.
> So John tell me R U Pro or Again Abortion. R U Pro Womens rites or against
It's funny you avoided my entire thread about slaves, and add shit to try and help you win your argument.
But to answer your last 2 questions, I am 100% against abortion, but but but, I do have few exceptions when abortion should be ok.
And and and, women should have just as much rites as men.
Now, since you are so open to illegals flooding the country illegally, why have you, yes you, not opened your home to them? Why havent you, yes you, offered them a job to maintain the landscape of your "multiple properties" that you, yes you, claim to own? And finally, why aren't you, yes you, down at the border protesting the way these "poor Mexicans" are being treated?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,388
@previous (O)
> And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
Where do you think that heroin bert shot up into his veins came from. He put cash into El Chapo's bank account.
> And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
Where do you think that heroin bert shot up into his veins came from. He put cash into El Chapo's bank account.
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 24 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,402
> > endorsed the White Nationalist Party and the Nazi's - He said they were good people
Notice you just passed that one by - Shame on Ya
You bring up some recent in tyme history re slaves - Civil war era - Fact is Slavery was totally endorsed in Your Bible - Your God approved of Slavery - Your relatives owned Slaves and my relatives may have been cept they came from Eu so no clue -
> And and and, women should have just as much rites as men.
Liar - If that were true You yes You wood support Abortion because that is the Platform of Women's Rights.
> Buuuuuuutttt, they need to be crossing over LEGALLY
The law DOES NOT REQUIRE Those seeking refuge aka Asylum to cross over Legally -
I endorse Anon P's comment re El Chapo
> I am 100% against abortion, but but but, I do have few exceptions when abortion should be ok.
100% with a but but but - Betting you're one who wishes his Mom had Aborted - and the but but but - Yep in your heart of heart you support women's rights with wiggle room as with Abortion - There is still hope for you. Oh and with 100% I suggest you take Math 101
> Why havent you, yes you, offered them a job to maintain the landscape of your "multiple properties
I never once asked for documents - for landscape - construction - repair - maintenance - I do ask to see license for contracting which never includes citizenship - AND I have assisted legally and a wee bit not so much when it comes to helping Illegals - One time even such that it - Well wayyy past Statute of limitation - Broke a Federal Law in helping AND here at the Beach with Feds here daily I dare not say what Help I may or may not have given - Just saying some good people have a chance at Legal Refuge which is all I will be saying
You if they are Brown U no want them around
Notice you just passed that one by - Shame on Ya
You bring up some recent in tyme history re slaves - Civil war era - Fact is Slavery was totally endorsed in Your Bible - Your God approved of Slavery - Your relatives owned Slaves and my relatives may have been cept they came from Eu so no clue -
> And and and, women should have just as much rites as men.
Liar - If that were true You yes You wood support Abortion because that is the Platform of Women's Rights.
> Buuuuuuutttt, they need to be crossing over LEGALLY
The law DOES NOT REQUIRE Those seeking refuge aka Asylum to cross over Legally -
I endorse Anon P's comment re El Chapo
> I am 100% against abortion, but but but, I do have few exceptions when abortion should be ok.
100% with a but but but - Betting you're one who wishes his Mom had Aborted - and the but but but - Yep in your heart of heart you support women's rights with wiggle room as with Abortion - There is still hope for you. Oh and with 100% I suggest you take Math 101
> Why havent you, yes you, offered them a job to maintain the landscape of your "multiple properties
I never once asked for documents - for landscape - construction - repair - maintenance - I do ask to see license for contracting which never includes citizenship - AND I have assisted legally and a wee bit not so much when it comes to helping Illegals - One time even such that it - Well wayyy past Statute of limitation - Broke a Federal Law in helping AND here at the Beach with Feds here daily I dare not say what Help I may or may not have given - Just saying some good people have a chance at Legal Refuge which is all I will be saying
You if they are Brown U no want them around
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 17 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,408
@971,370 (Syntax)Listen very closely..
FUCK the short brown women at the border AND their brown babies..
The women are criminals and the consequences are 100% their fault..
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,410
WHORES who fuck and then decide they dont want the child that is created ought to have to have the baby...then if they dont want to raise it should have to pay child support on it...maybe then the retarded dogs would learn to keep their legs together..Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,411
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,413
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Thanks for your stupid opinion you sloppy lardassed pos ignorant fuck..
Thanks for your stupid opinion you sloppy lardassed pos ignorant fuck..
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,415
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,416
@971,408 (A)
> The women are criminals and the consequences are 100% their fault..
Why are U against the Laws of USA
http://immigrationimpact.com/2018/07/17/it-is-legal-to-seek-asylum/
Do you need to C this from USA Gov web site? Of course U do - bert if you had finished High School U wood No this
https://www.uscis.gov/legal-resources/immigration-and-nationality-act
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1154&num=0&edition=prelim
8 USC 1154: Procedure for granting immigrant status
Text contains those laws in effect on February 22, 2019
From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION
Part I-Selection System
Jump To:
Source Credit
References In Text
Amendments
Effective Date
Miscellaneous
Lots n Lots of USA Law on USA Gov web site of TEXT 2 Read - Perhaps those of U in Tennessee are devoid of Knowledge of USA laws on books - This one since 1959 with Many Many court cases making it the LAW - Ur Law like it or not - You could move to Mexico if you No like R Laws
> The women are criminals and the consequences are 100% their fault..
Why are U against the Laws of USA
http://immigrationimpact.com/2018/07/17/it-is-legal-to-seek-asylum/
The Immigration and Nationality Act, which governs our nation’s immigration law, makes clear that anyone arriving at the U.S. border or within the United States is permitted to apply for protection. U.S. law embraces both international and domestic legal obligations not to return any person to a place where they face persecution on account of one of several protected grounds.
Do you need to C this from USA Gov web site? Of course U do - bert if you had finished High School U wood No this
https://www.uscis.gov/legal-resources/immigration-and-nationality-act
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) was enacted in 1952. The INA collected many provisions and reorganized the structure of immigration law. The INA has been amended many times over the years and contains many of the most important provisions of immigration law.
The INA is contained in the United States Code (U.S.C.). The U.S. Code is a collection of all the laws of the United States. Title 8 of the U.S. Code covers "Aliens and Nationality."
The INA is contained in the United States Code (U.S.C.). The U.S. Code is a collection of all the laws of the United States. Title 8 of the U.S. Code covers "Aliens and Nationality."
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1154&num=0&edition=prelim
8 USC 1154: Procedure for granting immigrant status
Text contains those laws in effect on February 22, 2019
From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION
Part I-Selection System
Jump To:
Source Credit
References In Text
Amendments
Effective Date
Miscellaneous
Lots n Lots of USA Law on USA Gov web site of TEXT 2 Read - Perhaps those of U in Tennessee are devoid of Knowledge of USA laws on books - This one since 1959 with Many Many court cases making it the LAW - Ur Law like it or not - You could move to Mexico if you No like R Laws
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,417
@971,408 (A)
"I'm NOT racist but disgusting brown people need to keep their smelly feet out of MY country"
@971,410 (A)
You haven't had a woman touch you in years. You should encourage sluttiness because it might help you get laid again before you die.
"I'm NOT racist but disgusting brown people need to keep their smelly feet out of MY country"
@971,410 (A)
You haven't had a woman touch you in years. You should encourage sluttiness because it might help you get laid again before you die.
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,419
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Odd thing with bert - Those brown people will get jobs and pay USA Taxes and end up paying for walls to keep other brown people out - Bert will not pay for Border guards - Walls or anything currently USA needs Yet the Illegals will - Illegals will make for much better people than bert - The vast majority have not nor will be in jail YET bert has.
Odd thing with bert - Those brown people will get jobs and pay USA Taxes and end up paying for walls to keep other brown people out - Bert will not pay for Border guards - Walls or anything currently USA needs Yet the Illegals will - Illegals will make for much better people than bert - The vast majority have not nor will be in jail YET bert has.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,421
@previous (Syntax)
Yeah on average an immigrant will earn more money than bert, commit less crime than bert, and have more children than bert, all while facing a lot more barriers to success than he ever did. Keeping immigrants out of the country so people like bert can have an easier time is self-destructive for a country.
Yeah on average an immigrant will earn more money than bert, commit less crime than bert, and have more children than bert, all while facing a lot more barriers to success than he ever did. Keeping immigrants out of the country so people like bert can have an easier time is self-destructive for a country.
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,423
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Yeah on average an immigrant will earn more money than bert, commit less crime than bert, and have more children than bert, all while facing a lot more barriers to success than he ever did. Keeping immigrants out of the country so people like bert can have an easier time is self-destructive for a country.
For sure they will have wayyyy more children than bert
They however follow Soccer so they will never be on net making fun of berts no win team.
> Yeah on average an immigrant will earn more money than bert, commit less crime than bert, and have more children than bert, all while facing a lot more barriers to success than he ever did. Keeping immigrants out of the country so people like bert can have an easier time is self-destructive for a country.
For sure they will have wayyyy more children than bert
They however follow Soccer so they will never be on net making fun of berts no win team.
Anonymous O replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,458
@971,388 (P)
> >And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
>
> Where do you think that heroin bert shot up into his veins came from. He put cash into El Chapo's bank account.
Which part of this comment below confused you?
> You support illegals coming over and destroying lives with their shit drugs. And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
> >And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
>
> Where do you think that heroin bert shot up into his veins came from. He put cash into El Chapo's bank account.
Which part of this comment below confused you?
> You support illegals coming over and destroying lives with their shit drugs. And you have the tenacity to accuse Bert of supporting El Chapo because he was doing drugs brought from Mexico?
Toilet Seat !TOD33vFX8s double-posted this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,459
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,460
@previous (Toilet Seat !TOD33vFX8s)
Could some kind soul say what the emergencies were
Also he has declared 3
Could some kind soul say what the emergencies were
Also he has declared 3
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 7 years ago, 48 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,470
@971,410 (A)
Why do you want children to be born into families that dont want them? Why do you want children to suffer?
Why do you want children to be born into families that dont want them? Why do you want children to suffer?
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,482
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,483
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 second later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #971,484
@971,460 (B)
If it says 1 then there's only 1. Does it matter that he's declared more than 1? Or that the latest one was declared as an unconstitutional end-run around Congress? No. Because a tweet says there's been only one. Thanks.
If it says 1 then there's only 1. Does it matter that he's declared more than 1? Or that the latest one was declared as an unconstitutional end-run around Congress? No. Because a tweet says there's been only one. Thanks.