Topic: Wow, this M2F tranny looks SO much like a woman, and NOT a dude wearing a wig!

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #84,463

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #970,312

@OP
Why not get an education and stop voting for Republicans?

Kook !g394spAKvY joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #970,313

I sometimes wonder if the trannies need to get some pussy and they'd be cured. A lot of them are just incels that want to become their own ideal girlfriend.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #970,316

> looks SO much like a woman

Just when was the last time you had your eyes examined OP

Does he wear a size 24 gown.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #970,317

That's unfortunate

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #970,325

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The poor dude has mental health problems.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #970,327

@previous (F)
Yes he does
But what's to be done?

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,329

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's very sad. I mean either he lives in misery as a he, or doesn't pass as a she

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,330

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I wish that we had some sort of technology to fix the brain issue

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,331

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
would it be okay with you if everybody just like let people look like shit? because plenty of people who aren't trans and don't have 'brain issues' look like, total fuckin' shit. all the time. people are weird, and people look weird, and people dress weird. who fuckin cares

Anonymous G double-posted this 7 years ago, 44 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,332

@970,327 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> Yes he does
> But what's to be done?

uhhhh, a makeover, duh

Anonymous G triple-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,333

also why is everybody so offended by non-passing trans people
it's like the ice man
if he wants me to call him the ice man by golly i will call him the ice man

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,337

@970,316 (D)
Autists do not understand humor or sarcasm.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #970,340

@970,331 (G)
Its not that they look like it shit, it's that their own appearance disturbs them and prevents them from achieving a goal that is central to their quality of life

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 11 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,431

Also, this dude can't seriously expect me to consider him a woman. He's not. He shouldn't be allowed into women's changing rooms toilets, prisons, or compete with them in sports just because he's wearing a wig and has mental health issues.

He can live his life however he wants though. But he's just a woman impersonator pretending to be one. No one else has to buy into his derangement or suspend their belief in reality to accommodate him.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,434

@previous (F)

See there's a difference between allowing em to enter women's bathrooms and prisons and referring to eir as "him" out of spite.

Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,436

@970,431 (F)
> But he's just a woman impersonator pretending to be one. No one else has to buy into his derangement or suspend their belief in reality to accommodate him.

Yep just Role Playing - Back in Willy Shakespeare's day men dressed up as women because women back then were not allowed to perform plays on stage. This role playing has been going on for many a years.

However you can be sure no Shakespeare role player wood have been allowed to wander in2 a woman's restroom

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,437

@previous (Syntax)

They did not even have separate restrooms at this time. People usually relieved themselves outside of theatres, as theatres did not have restroom facilities.

Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,442

@previous (I)
Yes even as I rote that reply I was fully aware that such restrooms were non existent.

Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,443

@previous (Syntax)

So you're just stupid, not ignorant?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,445

@970,434 (H)
Its hard and unnatural feeling to call someone who looks like that a she

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 26 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,446

@970,431 (F)
Agreed

Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,447

@970,443 (I)
My Triple Espresso has yet to kick in.

I feel the kicking in coming on - So
> However you can be sure no Shakespeare role player wood have been allowed to wander in2 a woman's restroom

Please look at Photo in OP's Topic

Assume He joins his local Shakespeare company (we have several here) - He wood not be allowed to wander in2 a female restroom (No I have NOT reviewed the laws here)

I refer to MC Rule #25 "Think globally. Not everyone lives in your country. Include such vital information when asking legal questions, etc."

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,470

@970,445 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

No its really not hard is it, its one letter

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,489

@previous (H)
I disagree. You naturally want to call someone who looks like a man, he

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,490

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Does this also apply if the person is cisgender?

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,493

@970,489 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

But that's just a learned behaviour, with the application of 3D thinking one can keep something in mind.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,494

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,495

@970,490 (J)
Yes. If the person looks like a man, you want to call them he

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 45 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,496

@970,493 (H)
I feel like that's one of the reasons that people feel like they're walking on eggshells around trans people.

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,497

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Just because they have a look on their face like they smell rotten eggs doesnt mean they feel like they're walking on eggshells.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,501

@970,496 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

Some people feel like that because those people objectify trans people and reduce them into an Other, which is a reflection of a lack of compassion. It's not difficult to control what you say. Indeed, some people might say that your own willpower is the ONLY thing you can control. Conscious, effortful regulation of the self by the self is a virtue and a mark of wisdom.

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,504

@previous (H)
There is no requirement to be compassionate. I won't suspend my belief and buy into someones delusion because they want to pretend they are a cat or dog either. I don't have to call anyone by their preferred anything.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,510

@970,501 (H)
I'm saying that a lot of our speech is ingrained in us and hard to change. It also doesn't help that a misgendering mistake, which can bean honest mistake, can have such negative consequences.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,512

@970,497 (K)
A lot of people do though, if an honest mistake in misgendering can bring about dire consequence

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,521

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
ITS MA'AM!

Jim !!U1oPlerJJ joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,524

@previous (F)
Don't try changing Kook's mind. She does not support the rights of transgender people.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,538

@previous (Jim !!U1oPlerJJ)
Jim what's up with you and tranny rights. If a guy puts on a dress he is still a male. Will always be a male. Even if they chop off his sausage and turn it into a man made hole, he is still a he. And yes he will insist on ITS MA'AM!

Me I will say no Sir you are a Sir which is a term of respect.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,541

@970,524 (Jim !!U1oPlerJJ)
Proper pronoun use isn't a right

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 33 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,542

@970,521 (F)
Lol like in that instance, it was purely accidental

Jim !!U1oPlerJJ replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,548

@970,541 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not using the correct pronouns is a hate crime.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,551

@970,504 (F)

There's no requirement to be ignorant, either.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,555

@970,548 (Jim !!U1oPlerJJ)
Lol

ugh replied with this 7 years ago, 8 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,556

@970,551 (H)
There is no requirement nor a law that forces me to call a he a she.

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,563

@previous (ugh)

No, just the moral duty to be virtuous.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,569

It’s cool how Syntax likes to talk shit about trannies, gays, and Muslims yet he votes Democrat.

Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,574

@previous (N)
I have one of those meetings to get to so my parting words on this subject is - No tyme really to do more than laff at how people end up so unhappy with how they were born and think a gender change will make life more better. I also have many friends who are Muslim because so many HIB's at Qualcomm are and there are many that work in other high tech companies around here that I no

I also like how that other thread turned more relevant with Pokemon but have no tyme to say so there
Oh on occasions I have voted for Republicans. More for the person than for that party

ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,579

@970,489 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's cultural, not natural

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,582

If one fully supports 'gay rights'...how can they not support trannies or infinite genders or people who want to marry their poodle..

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,590

@970,579 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
I think it's both

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,592

@970,582 (K)
It's a legitimate question..

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,593

@970,590 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
it's not. language was invented.

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,594

If one fully supports 'gay rights'...how can they not support trannies or infinite genders or people who want to marry their poodle..

Anonymous K double-posted this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,595

If one fully supports 'gay rights'...how can they not support trannies or infinite genders or people who want to marry their poodle..

Anonymous K triple-posted this 7 years ago, 56 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,615

That's what I thought..

Yep..

Anonymous F replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,624

@970,579 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
@970,593 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
What the fuck is wrong with you?

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,626

Ooohh...an attempt to bury the question...nice..

Anonymous K double-posted this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,632

Kook can run...but she cannot hide from admitting she is hypocritical..

Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 56 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,633

@previous (K)

Shut the fuck up, you babbling booze addled faggot.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 55 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,653

@970,593 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
But separating men and women has existed for milenia

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 22 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,654

@970,595 (K)
What counts as support?

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,667

@970,653 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes meaning it's cultural

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #970,676

@previous (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
To me, the term cultural has connotations of this is a new thing and is not very important

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,735

@970,654 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you feel as though you fully support gay rights...yes or no..

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,742

@970,676 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

That's just something that you've made up yourself.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,752

@970,667 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
You live in a weird bubble that no one else lives in and regular people don't put up with this bullshit because they have real problems. Everything about your world view is flawed. How is your transition coming along?

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,759

@previous (P)
What are you talking about. Learned human behaviours are per definition cultural.

@970,676 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Ok but that's not what something being cultural means

Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,763

@previous (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)

Steven Terner Mnuchin[2] (/məˈnuːʃɪn/ mə-NOO-shin;[3] born December 21, 1962) is an American investment banker[4] who is serving as the 77th United States Secretary of the Treasury as part of the Cabinet of Donald Trump. Previously, Mnuchin had been a hedge fund manager.

question is - why should anyone believe such a one

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,767

@previous (H)
You could also believe the dictionary

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,768

@970,735 (K)
Define what you mean by support and gay rights

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,769

@970,742 (H)
Possibly

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC triple-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,770

@970,759 (MR STEVEN MNUCHIN)
Maybe it's just me, but it feels as though people use the term to signify that something was created by humans and also insignificant/easy to change. Maybe it's just that thinks that

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,833

@970,768 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Never mind...I thought you were on the side of the gays as far as gay rights go..

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,836

@previous (K)
kook is mostly gay tard

MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,856

@970,770 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'd say culture has the ability to change (and always does) whilst one cannot change human nature.

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,877

@970,836 (Q)
And yet she does not want to extend the same hospitality offered to the 'gays' to the trannys and the so called infinite gender crowd..

Go figure..

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #970,882

@previous (K)
What do you even mean? What am I not extending?

Anonymous Q replied with this 7 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #971,060

@970,877 (K)
so?? why are you criticizing her for agreeing with you on something

Anonymous K replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #971,063

I'm nuts lately...I apologize..

Minichan