Topic: PETA..
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #84,046
Wonder if will protest the new after birth
abortions executions the Dumbocrats want Doctors to be able to do..
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 24 minutes later[^] [v] #966,126
Shit up fred
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #966,129
I mean...I guess maybe 'Fur is murder'...but then what is THIS..
aborted fetus.jpg
(available images too gruesome to post)
aborted fetus.jpg
(available images too gruesome to post)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #966,134
But there are acceptable reasons for pieces of shit to butcher the baby in their womb!!!Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #966,135
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #966,136
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #966,137
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #966,141
People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #966,142
@966,134 (A)
Why would you want women to give birth who know can't afford a child and know they wouldn't be a good parents to it? That's fucked up.
Why would you want women to give birth who know can't afford a child and know they wouldn't be a good parents to it? That's fucked up.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,143
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So why cant I legally get away with going down the street and murdering the baby of that chick I know who cant afford to raise it and would be a bad mother..
Will you come to court and heckle the judge when he laughs at me when I declare that..
So why cant I legally get away with going down the street and murdering the baby of that chick I know who cant afford to raise it and would be a bad mother..
Will you come to court and heckle the judge when he laughs at me when I declare that..
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,145
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,149
@966,143 (A)
Because a baby is a person and a fetus isn't. Unless you want to go around charging women who have miscarriages with manslaughter. Also it wouldn't be your place to decide anyway because it's not your kid and it's not growing inside of you.
Because a baby is a person and a fetus isn't. Unless you want to go around charging women who have miscarriages with manslaughter. Also it wouldn't be your place to decide anyway because it's not your kid and it's not growing inside of you.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,154
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 46 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,170
@966,137 (A)
> It's the natural order to do so..
No it's not. Did you decide that just because an animal don't have the same rights as a human? Do you think an animal doesn't fear death?
> It's the natural order to do so..
No it's not. Did you decide that just because an animal don't have the same rights as a human? Do you think an animal doesn't fear death?
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,190
Bert bet you are unaware that the US Constitution clearly said women and blacks had NO rights
In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.
Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," "It is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."
1972
Equal Rights Amendment passed by Congress NEVER Made it into LAW because Men of several states decided Women have no rights Because of the rejection of the Equal Rights Amendment, sexual equality, is not protected by the U.S. Constitution.
Remember in the Original US Constitution Women did not even have the right to vote.
So of course You as a Republican of White Nationalist Klu Klux Klan Roots; Decide that Women have No Rights Yet You have ever right to Abort your own Liver with Everclear.
In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.
Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," "It is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."
1972
Equal Rights Amendment passed by Congress NEVER Made it into LAW because Men of several states decided Women have no rights Because of the rejection of the Equal Rights Amendment, sexual equality, is not protected by the U.S. Constitution.
Remember in the Original US Constitution Women did not even have the right to vote.
So of course You as a Republican of White Nationalist Klu Klux Klan Roots; Decide that Women have No Rights Yet You have ever right to Abort your own Liver with Everclear.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,237
@966,149 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What about if she has no desire to kill her newborn baby...but by repeated texts and few phone calls I influence her to kill it..
Would you think I was in the wrong..
What about if she has no desire to kill her newborn baby...but by repeated texts and few phone calls I influence her to kill it..
Would you think I was in the wrong..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,243
@previous (A)
Consider how Tennessee and US Goburment would be better off if you had been aborted. You committed treason, while in the US Navy and were quickly eliminated. You're a common drunk that refuses to work and pay taxes. You're just living scum. Shame you lived even a few days after birth. Your afterbirth turned out to be more valuable then you.
Consider how Tennessee and US Goburment would be better off if you had been aborted. You committed treason, while in the US Navy and were quickly eliminated. You're a common drunk that refuses to work and pay taxes. You're just living scum. Shame you lived even a few days after birth. Your afterbirth turned out to be more valuable then you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,248
@previous (G)
The treason comment...pretty much fighting words..
Common...pffffft..
Paid taxes for 35 years not about to stop for another 15 or so..
The treason comment...pretty much fighting words..
Common...pffffft..
Paid taxes for 35 years not about to stop for another 15 or so..
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 56 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,257
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 59 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,258
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,270
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,286
@966,190 (Syntax)
> Bert bet you are unaware that the US Constitution clearly said women and blacks had NO rights
>
> In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.
>
> Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," "It is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."
>
> 1972
> Equal Rights Amendment passed by Congress NEVER Made it into LAW because Men of several states decided Women have no rights Because of the rejection of the Equal Rights Amendment, sexual equality, is not protected by the U.S. Constitution.
>
> Remember in the Original US Constitution Women did not even have the right to vote.
>
> So of course You as a Republican of White Nationalist Klu Klux Klan Roots; Decide that Women have No Rights Yet You have ever right to Abort your own Liver with Everclear.
Republicans freed the slaves. Democrats started the KKK. You seem very confused about this and keep repeating it.
> Bert bet you are unaware that the US Constitution clearly said women and blacks had NO rights
>
> In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.
>
> Referring to the language in the Declaration of Independence that includes the phrase, "all men are created equal," "It is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration. . . ."
>
> 1972
> Equal Rights Amendment passed by Congress NEVER Made it into LAW because Men of several states decided Women have no rights Because of the rejection of the Equal Rights Amendment, sexual equality, is not protected by the U.S. Constitution.
>
> Remember in the Original US Constitution Women did not even have the right to vote.
>
> So of course You as a Republican of White Nationalist Klu Klux Klan Roots; Decide that Women have No Rights Yet You have ever right to Abort your own Liver with Everclear.
Republicans freed the slaves. Democrats started the KKK. You seem very confused about this and keep repeating it.
Founded in 1866, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for blacks. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and black Republican leaders.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,289
@previous (H)
https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2018/oct/24/blog-posting/no-democratic-party-didnt-create-klu-klux-klan/
https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2018/oct/24/blog-posting/no-democratic-party-didnt-create-klu-klux-klan/
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 39 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,299
@previous (I)
That implies that the KKK wasn't "founded" by the Democrat party, and mentions that the members were Democrats attacking black and white Republicans. The point they make is that the KKK while being made up of Democrats, was not necessarily started by a party committee??
Maybe they didn't have a committee meeting about it, so maybe the party didn't officially found it, but all the members were Democrats with a shared hobby of killing black people... Okay. The KKK were Democrats. Thanks
That implies that the KKK wasn't "founded" by the Democrat party, and mentions that the members were Democrats attacking black and white Republicans. The point they make is that the KKK while being made up of Democrats, was not necessarily started by a party committee??
Maybe they didn't have a committee meeting about it, so maybe the party didn't officially found it, but all the members were Democrats with a shared hobby of killing black people... Okay. The KKK were Democrats. Thanks
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,305
@previous (H)
Yes but political coalitions change with time and there are shifts! The current Dems are not the same as Dems 100 years ago. Black people voted overwhelmingly Republican for decades following the civil war, but if you said the current Republican party is the party that most represents black people...you'd be not remotely close to accurate, despite that being true in 1925.
Yes but political coalitions change with time and there are shifts! The current Dems are not the same as Dems 100 years ago. Black people voted overwhelmingly Republican for decades following the civil war, but if you said the current Republican party is the party that most represents black people...you'd be not remotely close to accurate, despite that being true in 1925.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,306
@966,299 (H)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan#Current_Klan_organizations
Each listed is a Red Southern State Look up each leader and notice what political party they voted in. Or look at how they reacted to Obama lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan#Current_Klan_organizations
Each listed is a Red Southern State Look up each leader and notice what political party they voted in. Or look at how they reacted to Obama lol.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,307
@966,305 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
are you surprised that he doesn't know that time is linear for us or
are you surprised that he doesn't know that time is linear for us or
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,318
@966,299 (H)
> That implies that the KKK wasn't "founded" by the Democrat party, and mentions that the members were Democrats attacking black and white Republicans. The point they make is that the KKK while being made up of Democrats, was not necessarily started by a party committee??
>
> Maybe they didn't have a committee meeting about it, so maybe the party didn't officially found it, but all the members were Democrats with a shared hobby of killing black people... Okay. The KKK were Democrats. Thanks
There is no such party called Democrat party. Where are you getting facts.
> That implies that the KKK wasn't "founded" by the Democrat party, and mentions that the members were Democrats attacking black and white Republicans. The point they make is that the KKK while being made up of Democrats, was not necessarily started by a party committee??
>
> Maybe they didn't have a committee meeting about it, so maybe the party didn't officially found it, but all the members were Democrats with a shared hobby of killing black people... Okay. The KKK were Democrats. Thanks
There is no such party called Democrat party. Where are you getting facts.
Anonymous H replied with this 7 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #966,375
So, Democrats were the first Klan members. No one can dispute that because it's a well documented historical fact. Thanks