Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later[^][v]#964,759
It wasn't a bad speech. He was downright inspirational at times. Approval ratings for reading a good speech aren't the same as approval ratings for policy or conduct though. The guy is still a hosebag.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 30 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^][v]#964,765
This is prior to Speech - Trumps honesty ratings. Can post tomorrow the details of major lies and then how much or how little he lied during the speech.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#964,767
@previous (C)
The top 4 categories in that image are basically "True, but I wish he was actually lying" and they make up about 50% of the 'scorecard'. So when people say that everything out of his mouth is a lie, they are deluding themselves... because the odds are actually more like a coin toss than 100% certainty.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#964,768
@previous (D)
Look again at the chart Mostly False + False + Pants on Fire = 70% Now take the Half True and divide in half to give him the benefit of the doubt - That makes it 77%
77% dishonesty is a score card that is going to show up more and more towards the 2020 election. Again I will look at how he did during last nights speech tomorrow.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#964,770
Anonymous D double-posted this 7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#964,775
@964,768 (C)
"mostly false"??? You could easily relabel that as "somewhat true" but that doesn't make Trump look as bad, so they didn't.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#964,778
@previous (D)
We get it. You think even the lies should count as true. You're beating a somewhat recently alive horse.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#964,781
@previous (B)
Well I think if we're going to score him on truthiness, we should at least be aware of WHOSE facts are being used during the scoring process.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#964,782