Topic: Should intelligent design be taught alongside evolution?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #8,385

Should numerology be taught alongside math?

Should astrology be taught alongside astronomy?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #146,401

It should be taught in religious education, but it should not taught as fact.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #146,402

Yes, but not one from an Abrahamic religion. Any other one will do though.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,404

@OP
It's not the same thing, you twat. Die in a dick.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 21 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,405

@146,401 (B)
Ok, and where should numerology, and astrology be taught?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,406

@146,404 (D)

> not the same thing
Oh, okay, thanks for clearing that up!

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,407

@146,405 (A)
You're going to die alone, scatman. Nobody will mourn you.

(Edited 24 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,411

@146,405 (A)
They should not be taught.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,412

@146,407 (D)

> You're going to die alone, scatman. Nobody will mourn you.

lolthis

!5qPJGR/JRI (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,418

@146,407 (D)
It's Bitcoins actually.

@146,411 (B)
So we should give special treatment to certain beliefs over others?

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,419

@previous (!5qPJGR/JRI)
Right, yes, hmm. I thought that this thread lacked his enthusiasm.

I don't really have a problem with you. Carry on!

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,420

@146,418 (!5qPJGR/JRI)
> So we should give special treatment to certain beliefs over others?
Yep. Sorry, there's simply too many belief systems for all of them to be included in education.

!5qPJGR/JRI (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,461

@146,419 (D)
What we really need to be teaching kids in school is economics, and personal finance, the evils of the federal reserve, and the wonder that is a LiberatedCurrencyâ„¢.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 26 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,463

@146,420 (B)
How do you pick which ones are taught, and which ones aren't?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #146,484

No, of course not.

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #146,767

@146,461 (!5qPJGR/JRI)
Yes, teach Austrian economics.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #146,900

Should 2+2=5 be taught along side with 2+2=4?

Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #146,969

YES, in History class.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,091

@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
:') Best answer yet

dreamworks joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,185

Yes, but no mention of christianity.
Also perhaps what nega said

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,190

intelligent design should be taught as a philosophical alternative.

dreamworks replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,192

@previous (Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6)
yes

!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,234

There is no reason to teach ID in a biology class. Evolution is pretty much essential to a solid understanding of biology.

Intelligent Design is a clever phrase for creationism. There isnt anything to ID to teach. Seriously. Look at what proponents of ID 'teach.' it's clever philosophical bullshit. It's all Been debunked, anyway.

How could ID be taught? Irreducible complexity? Watches found in the wild? It has all been debunked. All of it. It's just idiotic.

Creationists have been shut down in a sympathetic court. There is just no arguments for Intelligent Design.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,237

@147,091 (A)

> :') Best answer yet.

That's what I do: giving answers and cutting through seemingly complex issues with one swift stroke. :')

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 46 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #147,262

> PE? Sorry, I only believe in metaphysical education.

Minichan