Topic: Why are Democrats wearing Klan robes to the State of the Union?
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #83,847
I guess they just wear what they feel comfortable in ?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #964,086
You have a typo
Klu Klux Klan are Republicans.
Klu Klux Klan are Republicans.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,087
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,088
ENDING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION!!!
Anonymous C double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,089
ORDERING MORE TROOPS TO MEET THE CARAVANS!!
Anonymous C triple-posted this 7 years ago, 33 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,090
Look at the gnashing of teeth lololol
Anonymous C quadruple-posted this 7 years ago, 43 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,092
BUILD THE WALL BUILD THE WAL BUILD THE WALL..
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,093
@964,089 (C)
> ORDERING MORE TROOPS TO MEET THE CARAVANS!!
It is illegal for troops to work as police in USA.
Posse Comitatus Act and the US Military on the Border
https://www.thoughtco.com/posse-comitatus-act-military-on-border...
The Posse Comitatus Act, signed into law by President Rutherford B. Hayes on June 18, 1878, limits the power of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce U.S. laws and domestic policies within the borders of the United States.
> ORDERING MORE TROOPS TO MEET THE CARAVANS!!
It is illegal for troops to work as police in USA.
Posse Comitatus Act and the US Military on the Border
https://www.thoughtco.com/posse-comitatus-act-military-on-border...
The Posse Comitatus Act, signed into law by President Rutherford B. Hayes on June 18, 1878, limits the power of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce U.S. laws and domestic policies within the borders of the United States.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,095
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 32 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,096
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,097
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,098
@964,095 (E)
> What is the Great Realignment?
The Democratic Party started in the 1820s. Right away, it switched sides, as we can see from the fact that they pushed for the removal and extermination of Indians. Also, their opposition was the Whig party, which was against the Indian Removal Act and vowed to protect minorities against mob rule. Because the sides were switched, the vast majority of Whig party were anti-slavery.
(Eventually, there was rift in the party over the issue of slavery, and anti-slavery members of the Whig party, including Abraham Lincoln, exited the party and formed the Republican Party. As we can see, the parties must have switched again because it's common knowledge that republicans are actually the racist ones.)
Then the parties switched when the democrats are on record as having mainly been the ones who owned slaves. Not all democrats owned slaves, but 100% of slaves were owned by democrats. Not a single republican in history owned a slave.
As we know, the parties switched again when republicans repudiated slavery and democrats defended it, leading to the civil war.
Then the parties switched again when a democrat assassinated republican Lincoln.
After the civil war, the parties switched again during the reconstruction era, when republicans attempted to pass a series of civil rights amendments in the late 1800s that would grant citizenship for freedmen. As evidence of the switch, the democrats voted against giving former slaves citizenship, but the civil rights amendments passed anyway.
The parties switched again when the Democratic Party members founded the KKK as their military arm. Democrats then attempted to pass the first gun control law in order to keep blacks from having guns and retaliating against their former owners. A county wanted to make it illegal to possess firearms, unless you were on a horse. (Hmmm wonder who rode around on horses terrorizing people ?). Gun control has always been a noble cause touted by democrats, but the racist reasons why the concept of gun control was dreamed up was a part of a party mentality switch, but not the actual party.
Somewhere around this time former slaves fought for gun rights for all, and the NRA was formed. The NRA switched parties too when they defended the right for blacks to arm themselves and white NRA members protected blacks from racist attackers.
The parties switched again when republicans fought to desegregate schools and allow black children to attend school with white children, which democrats fought fiercely against.
The nation saw a rash of black lynchings and bombings of black churches by the democrats in the KKK and the parties switched again when Democrat Bull Conner tried to avoid prosecuting the racist bombers to get them off the hook. When blacks protested this injustice, the party-switched democrat Bull Conner sicced dogs and turned the hose on them. He also gave police stand down orders when the KKK forewarned attacks on the freedom riders, who had switched parties.
The parties switched again when a Democratic Party president appointmented the first and only KKK member to the Supreme Court.
The parties switched yet again when Democratic president FDR put Asians in racist internment camps.
Then parties switched again when the democrats filibustered the passing of the second set of civil rights laws giving equal protection to minorities.
The parties switched when a democrat assassinated MLK.
This brings us to modern times. The parties continue to switch all the time.
The parties switched when democrats proposed racist policies like affirmative action to limit opportunities for certain racial groups in order to grant privilege to other racial groups.
The parties switched when the Islamic fundamentalist Omar Mateen and several other ISIS mass shooters aligned themselves with democratic candidates like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.
The parties switched again when liberal student groups in schools like UCLA and Berkeley call for segregated housing to make "separate but equal" housing quarters for black students. Actually this is a current ongoing thing, so the parties are right now in the middle of switching on this topic.
Parties always switched currently now that democrats are rioting and violently protesting democracy.
So as you can see, because of Party switching, democrats were always the ones who stood up against racism and wanted peace and unity while republicans were always the racist and violent ones calling for division and discord.
You got schooled, son.
> What is the Great Realignment?
The Democratic Party started in the 1820s. Right away, it switched sides, as we can see from the fact that they pushed for the removal and extermination of Indians. Also, their opposition was the Whig party, which was against the Indian Removal Act and vowed to protect minorities against mob rule. Because the sides were switched, the vast majority of Whig party were anti-slavery.
(Eventually, there was rift in the party over the issue of slavery, and anti-slavery members of the Whig party, including Abraham Lincoln, exited the party and formed the Republican Party. As we can see, the parties must have switched again because it's common knowledge that republicans are actually the racist ones.)
Then the parties switched when the democrats are on record as having mainly been the ones who owned slaves. Not all democrats owned slaves, but 100% of slaves were owned by democrats. Not a single republican in history owned a slave.
As we know, the parties switched again when republicans repudiated slavery and democrats defended it, leading to the civil war.
Then the parties switched again when a democrat assassinated republican Lincoln.
After the civil war, the parties switched again during the reconstruction era, when republicans attempted to pass a series of civil rights amendments in the late 1800s that would grant citizenship for freedmen. As evidence of the switch, the democrats voted against giving former slaves citizenship, but the civil rights amendments passed anyway.
The parties switched again when the Democratic Party members founded the KKK as their military arm. Democrats then attempted to pass the first gun control law in order to keep blacks from having guns and retaliating against their former owners. A county wanted to make it illegal to possess firearms, unless you were on a horse. (Hmmm wonder who rode around on horses terrorizing people ?). Gun control has always been a noble cause touted by democrats, but the racist reasons why the concept of gun control was dreamed up was a part of a party mentality switch, but not the actual party.
Somewhere around this time former slaves fought for gun rights for all, and the NRA was formed. The NRA switched parties too when they defended the right for blacks to arm themselves and white NRA members protected blacks from racist attackers.
The parties switched again when republicans fought to desegregate schools and allow black children to attend school with white children, which democrats fought fiercely against.
The nation saw a rash of black lynchings and bombings of black churches by the democrats in the KKK and the parties switched again when Democrat Bull Conner tried to avoid prosecuting the racist bombers to get them off the hook. When blacks protested this injustice, the party-switched democrat Bull Conner sicced dogs and turned the hose on them. He also gave police stand down orders when the KKK forewarned attacks on the freedom riders, who had switched parties.
The parties switched again when a Democratic Party president appointmented the first and only KKK member to the Supreme Court.
The parties switched yet again when Democratic president FDR put Asians in racist internment camps.
Then parties switched again when the democrats filibustered the passing of the second set of civil rights laws giving equal protection to minorities.
The parties switched when a democrat assassinated MLK.
This brings us to modern times. The parties continue to switch all the time.
The parties switched when democrats proposed racist policies like affirmative action to limit opportunities for certain racial groups in order to grant privilege to other racial groups.
The parties switched when the Islamic fundamentalist Omar Mateen and several other ISIS mass shooters aligned themselves with democratic candidates like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.
The parties switched again when liberal student groups in schools like UCLA and Berkeley call for segregated housing to make "separate but equal" housing quarters for black students. Actually this is a current ongoing thing, so the parties are right now in the middle of switching on this topic.
Parties always switched currently now that democrats are rioting and violently protesting democracy.
So as you can see, because of Party switching, democrats were always the ones who stood up against racism and wanted peace and unity while republicans were always the racist and violent ones calling for division and discord.
You got schooled, son.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 30 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,099
TRUMP-WINNING..
DUMBOCRAT LIBERALS- WHINING..
DUMBOCRAT LIBERALS- WHINING..
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,100
@964,096 (A)
@964,097 (C)
So neither of you completed high school.
Sorry for your loss. You have no value as citizens of USA
@964,097 (C)
So neither of you completed high school.
Sorry for your loss. You have no value as citizens of USA
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 34 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,101
ICE ICE BABY..
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 57 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,102
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,103
Anonymous C double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,105
HE WILL GET IT BUILT..
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,115
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 30 seconds later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #964,117
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #964,180
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,221
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,340
I haven't seen the democraps this upset since the Republicans freed the slaves.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,359
Why on Earth would the KKK support LGBT antidiscrimination policies?
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 50 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,381
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 26 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,382
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,383
@previous (E)
Relax, some day you will be interested in girls and realize they should give you wood.
Relax, some day you will be interested in girls and realize they should give you wood.
Anonymous E replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #964,384
@previous (C)
Pointing out when a 76 going on 77-year-old man is being creepy doesn't make them pre-pubescent or homosexual.
Pointing out when a 76 going on 77-year-old man is being creepy doesn't make them pre-pubescent or homosexual.