Serious discussions only cause heartache and upset feelings. Further, everyone here is a retard so what's the point?
Therefore, from this point forward, please DO NOT discuss serious topics including but not limited to war, peace, economics, politics, the environment, social justice, philosophy, education, the law, death, culture, psychology, history, your feelings, technology, automation, trade, foreign affairs, immigration, agriculture, housing, transportation, taxes, health care, intersectionality, and/or national security.
You may still call people trannies and talk about your ladysticks as we obviously don't want to totally kill the board.
There will be a 7-day grace period in which these topics and posts will be deleted with a mere warning. After that, expect to be BANNED for violating this rule.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#957,596
So you are saying we cannot talk about social justice - Got that.
Will from now on only talk about Social Injustice.
The Board™ (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,598
@previous (B)
That is acceptable to us. Thank you.
The Board™ (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,603
Also race, religion, guns, violence, society, spiritualism, the afterlife, the press, art, artificial intelligence, space travel, evolution, the origin of life, vaccinations, ethics, and morality. These topics are also banned.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,608
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,611
OK I will only discuss immorality -
Damn one on list is going to be difficult to reply to Cathy because it's on the list and I will have to find a way to reply and stay inside the new guidelines
Will work out a way to say inside the lines with my crayons
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,618
@previous (B)
you are going to have to be very judicious with your use of Copy+Paste.
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,625
@previous (D)
As I don't see sports on the list currently I still have tyme to discover if bert has any balls left in his court. - Can he man up in his town and attend the game today or wimp out n watch it on telly.
MR STEVEN MNUCHIN joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 36 seconds later, 41 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,626
Hip-hop has done more damage to young African Americans than racism in recent years.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,627
@957,625 (B)
Even if you somehow manage to have a serious discussion about sports, they are not at all an important matter!
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,628
@previous (D)
True - It does give Bert excuse to get drunk and spam MC and he does that no matter win or lose
Looked up the Stats and looks like he will be 2hung over on monday to apply for work AGAIN.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^][v]#957,630
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#957,641
Welp
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,651
Beatdown...Southern style..
Rat a tat tat tat...on that aaaasss..
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,659
@previous (G)
Rat a tat tat tat
Even if Vols win, you are not fit to look for work.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,702
Typical.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 56 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,725
So you're saying gumbo is still on the table?
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,732
@previous (J)
All Gumbo has been consumed. We have moved on to Coq au vin.
Nor is this easy to accomplish because it requires a Rooster, not a simple chicken.
Anonymous J replied with this 7 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,739
@previous (B)
Ahh yes, authentic traditional Louisianan rooster gumbo
MR STEVEN MNUCHIN replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#957,759