Topic: Do any of you retards still believe the false narrative about Russia collusion?
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #82,925
You have got to be fucking stupid and wilfully ignorant if you still believe that story. Fake Anon and Becky, I'm looking at you two.cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #955,707
You're a retard and a FART
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,708
cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,710
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,711
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,713
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,714
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,715
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,717
@previous (C)
There's just enough time for the whole thing to implode on the Democrats before the 2020 election.
There's just enough time for the whole thing to implode on the Democrats before the 2020 election.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,718
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #955,719
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #955,720
@previous (A)
Unredacted documents sound great. Why would that be a problem though? The redactions in the SCO investigation documents only surround Trump and his campaign.
Unredacted documents sound great. Why would that be a problem though? The redactions in the SCO investigation documents only surround Trump and his campaign.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #955,721
@previous (C)
It was the FBI under the Obama administration that did everything in their power to assist Hillary Clinton, became partisan hacks, lied and obtained a FISA based on a fake foreign dossier to spy on an American. Who investigates the investigators?
Let’s hold public hearings with testimony by all the key figures. Present the compelling evidence and the findings 20 months later?
It was the FBI under the Obama administration that did everything in their power to assist Hillary Clinton, became partisan hacks, lied and obtained a FISA based on a fake foreign dossier to spy on an American. Who investigates the investigators?
Let’s hold public hearings with testimony by all the key figures. Present the compelling evidence and the findings 20 months later?
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #955,723
@previous (A)
> It was the FBI under the Obama administration that did everything in their power to assist Hillary Clinton
No they didn't. They were investigating Clinton, and Comey's remarks before the election probably cost her votes.
> obtained a FISA based on a fake foreign dossier
I don't think there's any evidence for that claim either - either regarding the veracity of the dossier or that it started the investigation.
Do you think Trump is nervous about Cohen's upcoming testimony?
> It was the FBI under the Obama administration that did everything in their power to assist Hillary Clinton
No they didn't. They were investigating Clinton, and Comey's remarks before the election probably cost her votes.
> obtained a FISA based on a fake foreign dossier
I don't think there's any evidence for that claim either - either regarding the veracity of the dossier or that it started the investigation.
Do you think Trump is nervous about Cohen's upcoming testimony?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,725
@previous (C)
You call that an investigation? Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One.
Trump wins 2020, and gets another Supreme Court nominee.
You call that an investigation? Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One.
Investigative journalist Michael Isikoff, who broke the dossier story, admitted recently, “When you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them, and, in fact, there is good grounds to think that some of the more sensational allegations will never be proven and are likely false.”
Trump wins 2020, and gets another Supreme Court nominee.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,728
@previous (A)
That's a nice quote about the dossier, but I don't see how it's relevant if the investigation wasn't based on it. I still don't know what you are talking about regarding unredacted documents, the FBI being partisan, or the investigation imploding.
> Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One
You just jump from topic to topic making new claims, don't you?
That's a nice quote about the dossier, but I don't see how it's relevant if the investigation wasn't based on it. I still don't know what you are talking about regarding unredacted documents, the FBI being partisan, or the investigation imploding.
> Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One
You just jump from topic to topic making new claims, don't you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,748
@previous (C)
> No they didn't. They were investigating Clinton, and Comey's remarks before the election probably cost her votes.
You call that an investigation? Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One.
> You just jump from topic to topic making new claims, don't you?
You are wilfully ignorant.
> No they didn't. They were investigating Clinton, and Comey's remarks before the election probably cost her votes.
You call that an investigation? Hillary Clinton is covering up Benghazi and Uranium One.
> You just jump from topic to topic making new claims, don't you?
You are wilfully ignorant.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 28 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,761
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,778
OP gets his information direct from Sean Hannity and 'Judge' Jeanine.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,782
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,787
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,794
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 48 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,813
@955,761 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> You're a FART too but you pretend others
lol what how
@955,778 (E)
can you imagine
> You're a FART too but you pretend others
lol what how
@955,778 (E)
can you imagine
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,814
Anonymous G replied with this 7 years ago, 47 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,825
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,870
@previous (G)
Hillary Clinton will not be indicted by federal prosecutors for anything related to Benghazi or Uranium One in a time frame of your choosing. If she is I'll donate $10 to a non-political charity of your choice. If she isn't, you donate $10 to a non-political charity of my choice.
Hillary Clinton will not be indicted by federal prosecutors for anything related to Benghazi or Uranium One in a time frame of your choosing. If she is I'll donate $10 to a non-political charity of your choice. If she isn't, you donate $10 to a non-political charity of my choice.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,871
Love how Becky insults him, and then just ignores him. Everyone, likely even the FART himself, know that she outclasses him. His humor is too weak to deal with her.
Anonymous C replied with this 7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #955,887
@955,748 (A)
Oh? Please enlighten me. Why aren't these crimes Clinton is covering up being prosecuted or even investigated anymore? What does any of that have to do with the Mueller investigation?
Oh? Please enlighten me. Why aren't these crimes Clinton is covering up being prosecuted or even investigated anymore? What does any of that have to do with the Mueller investigation?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #956,028
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 days later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #957,512
I love BuzzFeed. They know what's up