Stalin !/W36t6cILw joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#953,217
There's a unwritten rule that you do not talj about unwritten rules.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^][v]#953,234
You made like multiple matt-impersonating threads per day for WEEKS before I deleted any. Please let me know which of these topics I deleted were actually good:
Topic: The main differences between American women, and Chinese women.
American women seem to gravitate toward abusive douchebags. They like "a dangerous man" who is "a bad boy". While out and about, they expect men who approach them, to act like they are in a Hollywood movie, saying just the right thing, acting just the right way. Men must be both feminists, and alpha male douchebags, who are rich and suave and look like Brad Pitt. American women are very artificial.
Chinese women want a man who is honest, decent, and a hard worker. He does not have to be gorgeous or perfect. You can approach a Chinese woman and just talk: if you are nice, she will like you. You do not have to pretend you are a Hollywood actor. They want a man who is simply nice and decent.
Topic: Damn Midwestern, pale, bland, flavorless pieces of crap.
"Tater tots" are not food.
Topic: pípí & púpú
títí & dúdú
Topic: púß
(pronounced as one word)
The reason I deleted them, like I told you at the time, is because they were shit-tier matt-impersonating posts. The board is better for not having them. They weren't deleted for impersonating matt, they were deleted for being garbage.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#953,236
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That tater tot post is both relevant and poignant
Mr. Ray Parker Jr. joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^][v]#953,244
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,310
@953,247 (A)
I'm not going back in time and deleting shitposts from months or years ago. If I see bad posts, I remove them. I am not on the fora 24/7 so I'm sure I miss some. If you see bad posts, report them. I don't understand your aims.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,314
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I do report shitposts. You responded by removing the reporting function.
Mr. Ray Parker Jr. replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,319
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,352
@953,319 (Mr. Ray Parker Jr.)
I've had my reporting ability removed twice.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,359
> The reason I deleted them, like I told you at the time, is because they were shit-tier matt-impersonating posts. The board is better for not having them. They weren't deleted for impersonating matt, they were deleted for being garbage.
Your damn job is not to judge the merit of posts according to how they match up with your values and expectations sonny boy..
You're acting a bit too big for your britches..
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 33 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,364
@953,352 (D)
You deserved it though. @previous (G)
I barely enforce any standards, and the one time I delete literally copy and pasted shitposts everyone somehow thinks I'm a Nazi mod! There's no winning here.
Anonymous G replied with this 7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,366
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Maybe your position regarding the deletions were not totally unethical..
It's just the public pontificating that was a bit over the line...mods should be diplomatic and tactful in public interactions..
Everyone appreciates your efforts I think....keep up the good work..
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Mr. Ray Parker Jr. replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,368
Would that be before or after you offered to suck my dick for spare change?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 6 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,441
@953,342 (Captain Kate Carr)
It sounds like a sharp "s" and looks like the old way of writing "ts". Combine that with the sound of a "ú".
@953,364 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Be honest: you only deleted those cut-and-paste topics because the original author reported them, and the original poster reported them because I took away his ability to get attention.
Captain Kate Carr replied with this 7 years ago, 50 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,444
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,468
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)P
So sad that on a Sat Nite you are stuck home n alone > ...will those topics and replies be deleted, based on the unwritten rule that impersonating certain people is forbidden?
I am unaware of such rule EXCEPT for when r04r flipped out over the mass number of Syntax Imps and put a stop 2 such quickly.
> impersonating certain people is forbidden?
Ceems 2Me that when Fake Anon put his tripcode out to other mods and one or more decides to Imp Fake Anon - Such well nuff said. Oh there is or was a rule that forbid Tripcode sharing but I have not taken tyme to C if such rule still is existential
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#953,476
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#953,875
@previous (A)
Have you considered this option.
boards.4chan.org/
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#953,881
@953,864 (A)
No, just the all-time greats. The rest have not withstood the test of time.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 13 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#954,182
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The all time greats are not the all time greats, and they have not withstood the test of time except for those that have withstood the test of time.