I don't understand why she deems herself unworthy of my time. Both of them had/have unwarranted self importance when it came to their attractiveness levels, far overestimating how well they looked.
I couldn't even use Emma's main doxx, her flaccid tit-rack, after a while (and I've since lost them anyway -- this was back in 2011 when she could verifiably be recognized a lolcow in her own right, and why we threw her out of the Kim's Brethren - an old YouTube trolling crew I ran - to begin with, just a month before I was deposed) because they were that repulsive, and it appears Harriet has the same problem. Autism involves higher testosterone levels, and women with autism have higher testosterone levels than their non-autistic counterparts (but interestingly, not the males). So, it's no wonder, that they tend to look like bleached negroids when it afflicts a white person. The big, honking noses, the massive monobrows, the wide faces, they're all hallmarks of dysgenic ugliness.
None of this constitutes harassment by the way, Harriet. These are called "hatefacts", a phenomenon you may refer to on Metapedia. They have the appearances of prejudicial remarks but turn out to be entirely true. She honestly deserves a slap for even thinking that she's important enough to be harassed.(Edited 26 seconds later.)
@OP
> I don't understand why she deems herself unworthy of my time. Both of them had/have unwarranted self importance when it came to their attractiveness levels, far overestimating how well they looked.
>
> I couldn't even use Emma's main doxx, her flaccid tit-rack, after a while (and I've since lost them anyway -- this was back in 2011 when she could verifiably be recognized a lolcow in her own right, and why we threw her out of the Kim's Brethren - an old YouTube trolling crew I ran - to begin with, just a month before I was deposed) because they were that repulsive, and it appears Harriet has the same problem. Autism involves higher testosterone levels, and women with autism have higher testosterone levels than their non-autistic counterparts (but interestingly, not the males). So, it's no wonder, that they tend to look like bleached negroids when it afflicts a white person. The big, honking noses, the massive monobrows, the wide faces, they're all hallmarks of dysgenic ugliness.
>
> None of this constitutes harassment by the way, Harriet. These are called "hatefacts", a phenomenon you may refer to on Metapedia. They have the appearances of prejudicial remarks but turn out to be entirely true. She honestly deserves a slap for even thinking that she's important enough to be harassed.
oh yeah?