Topic: FAO: becky Re: your biased paralegal opinion on this statement please

Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #81,783

"If Manafort hadn't worked for Trump, if Flynn hadn't worked for Trump, if Cohen hadn't worked Trump, none of them are ever targeted or prosecuted."

Having worked for lawyers, is this something that you think every lawyer in criminal law knows?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 5 hours later[^] [v] #947,563

becky bump

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,591

I have no idea what you are on about

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,646

@previous (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
> "If Manafort hadn't worked for Trump, if Flynn hadn't worked for Trump, if Cohen hadn't worked Trump, none of them are ever targeted or prosecuted."

Is this a true statement, and would a lawyer know it to be true if it is?

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE replied with this 7 years ago, 35 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,649

@previous (A)
If they hadn't worked for Trump, they wouldn't have committed crimes with Trump so no, I don't think they would have been prosecuted for committing crimes with Trump.

Gently, friend, are you retarded?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,652

@previous (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
Your Trump Derangement Syndrome is the gift that keeps on giving. Thanks

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,654

@previous (A)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 7 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,677

@947,649 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
It's entrapment when you commit crimes and law enforcement finds out about it from the media thanks.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,678

@947,649 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
What I think they meant was, would their particular actions be focused on for prosecution if they hadn't done those actions with Trump? I'm not sure

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE replied with this 7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,679

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
They wouldn't have committed crimes with Trump if Trump wasn't involved.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,681

@previous (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
No but if they had committed similar crimes with other people, I think

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,683

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Did you know 1+1=2

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 22 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,684

@947,681 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
In my expert opinion Trump probably shouldn't have hired them then.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,685

@947,683 (F)
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Thats not even the point. Of course they're crooks

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,693

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)

> Thats not even the point. Of course they're crooks

what's the point

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,695

@947,685 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't get the point. That the president's associates' actions are more scruitinized than some mayor in bumfuck Idaho? That's probably true but I don't get the significance.

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 29 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,703

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yes that's what op was getting at. I think

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 29 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,704

@947,693 (G)
That people are gunning for those connected to the president?

Anonymous G replied with this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,706

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
but...

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #947,708

@previous (G)
That's what op is saying

(Edited 22 seconds later.)

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,730

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's such a retarded point, if there's even a point there at all.

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE double-posted this 7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,731

Would anyone have investigated Trump and his cronies for election related crimes if there was no election??

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE triple-posted this 7 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,732

Would anyone have investigated Al Capone for income tax evasion if the IRS never existed?

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE quadruple-posted this 7 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,734

Would Bonnie and Clyde have been Bonnie and Clyde if there was no Clyde?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,748

@previous (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)

Clyde could have been the horse

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,754

@947,730 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
@947,731 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
@947,732 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
@947,734 (cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE)
Expert paralegal opinion. Well done

cccuuunnttt !RwordOooFE replied with this 7 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,772

@947,748 (H)
And what about Clyde's gay turtle, Jerry??

Sheila LaBœf replied with this 7 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,773

@947,748 (H)

> Clyde could have been the horse

interesting. Bonnie the lone gunwoman and her trusty Clydesdale horse, Clyde

Anonymous I replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,775

@previous (Sheila LaBœf)
Does Clyde have to be a Clydesdale?

Sheila LaBœf replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #947,790

@previous (I)
yes. the only Clydesdale in the wild west

Minichan