RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos started this discussion 15 years ago#8,163
> Analysts said the group appears to be some sort of spin-off of "Anonymous," the loose coalition of hackers that grew to prominence through their support of the whistleblower site WikiLeaks.
> But while Anonymous has its own set of moral codes and is largely politically motivated, LulzSec seems to be random.
So embarrassing. Yet we are meant to trust these news agencies for important stuff like politics and world events? Don't be sheeple - research the facts yourself! Question everything!
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,628
@previous (r04r)
Why suddenly stop then? They were gay, I didn't like them.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,629
@142,619 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
You mean Ryan Cleary, the man from Essex? I doubt it, he only ran their IRC.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,630
@142,628 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
They claim they planned to go just for a limited time and maybe feel they're done now. Or they ran out of stuff to do, or got bored with it. Who knows.
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,632
@142,628 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
It wasn't exactly sudden, they probably planned from the start to stop after 50 days. He was insignificant, and that's their words.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,634
@142,629 (D)
I'm not saying that they stopped because it completely crippled their infrastructure and their screwed now lol, but I was suggesting that maybe they think they've gone far enough, quit while they're still ahead? maybe not.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,635
@142,630 (r04r)
They weren't doing it for "teh lulz" they gave moral and political reasons for some of their actions. They were just glorified moralfags. gay
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,637
@142,634 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Maybe, I guess nobody will really know.
I liked them anyway.
Anonymous D double-posted this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,639
@142,635 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos) > They weren't doing it for "teh lulz" they gave moral and political reasons for some of their actions. They were just glorified moralfags. gay
[citation needed]
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,642
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,643
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
That "press release" wasn't written by them; http://twitter.com/#!/LulzSec/status/84075440024719361 They didn't have any moral qualms with anything else they did, I see no reason why they would have a sudden change of heart.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,645
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,646
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
What do you mean?
Either way, they're not giant moralfags.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,650
@previous (D)
I mean the content was approved by lulzsec i.e. that was their real justification
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,653
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
I suppose. I bet if they had written that "statement" they would've said they were doing it "for the lulz", though.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,654
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,687
@142,681 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
Because your dox were published? LOL
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,688
@142,681 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
Nobody likes you. Go away. :3
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,689
@142,687 (G)
Nope, since I'm not the kind of fucking imbecile that damages other peoples' property for shits and giggles.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU double-posted this 15 years ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,691
@142,688 (D) > LOL LULZSEC IS SO EDGY AND EPIC xD DO NOT FOR GIVE AND DO NOT FOR GET LOLOL SO RANDUM
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,692
@previous (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
Don't be another Ks.
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,693
@142,689 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
No, you're just an imbecile regardless. I hope you did get your dox published, be nice to see you brought down a peg or two.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,695
@previous (G)
You don't think I'd just save everyones' number that called me and fuck them up with telemarketers?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,699
@142,689 (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
Do not become another Ks...
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,700