Topic: Hey Becky, how's it going?
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 started this discussion 15 years ago #8,154
I noticed you were trying to bump all my threads last night. Do you have a crush on me or something? Seems like you were desperately trying to get my attention.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later[^] [v] #142,227
BUMP.Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,267
She must be peacefully sleeping, dreaming of me. I'm sure she'll respond in the morning.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,271
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,272
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 second later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,273
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,278
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,280
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #142,282
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,309
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,337
@OP
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,344
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,345
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,354
@142,344 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Jesus fuck you retard, when have you ever heard a court declare someone "innocent"? He pleaded to a lesser charge anyway. Do you understand the legal system at all, or are you just that hard up to find another female to call a bitch that any old thing will do?Â
Please name the "several courts" that say he did not rape her. Do you believe that the matter of the rape was addressed in this lawsuit? We may be talking about different cases, if so, because he already fucking pleaded guilty to assault. And this is a civil trial between the victim and her school.
Honestly, you're one of the biggest idiots here. Listen, I'm really sorry that you're not getting hours of anal these days, but you shouldn't let that cloud your judgment so much.
Jesus fuck you retard, when have you ever heard a court declare someone "innocent"? He pleaded to a lesser charge anyway. Do you understand the legal system at all, or are you just that hard up to find another female to call a bitch that any old thing will do?Â
Please name the "several courts" that say he did not rape her. Do you believe that the matter of the rape was addressed in this lawsuit? We may be talking about different cases, if so, because he already fucking pleaded guilty to assault. And this is a civil trial between the victim and her school.
Honestly, you're one of the biggest idiots here. Listen, I'm really sorry that you're not getting hours of anal these days, but you shouldn't let that cloud your judgment so much.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #142,358
@previous (D)
Innocent until proven guilty. He plead guilty to a lesser charge, and convicted on the lesser charge. If he wasn't convicted of rape, then he's not guilty of rape.
Regardless of what he did, or what the court said, I stand by my previous analogy and I side with the school. If she doesn't want to cheer for him she doesn't have to be on the cheer squad.
The other court cases had nothing to do with whether or not she was raped. They were on whether or not it was right for her to not cheer and right for the school to kick her off the squad. All of those cases, including the appeals court, sided with the school and even called her lawsuit frivolous. So call me retarded all you want, but several judges and jurors tend to agree with me.
Innocent until proven guilty. He plead guilty to a lesser charge, and convicted on the lesser charge. If he wasn't convicted of rape, then he's not guilty of rape.
Regardless of what he did, or what the court said, I stand by my previous analogy and I side with the school. If she doesn't want to cheer for him she doesn't have to be on the cheer squad.
The other court cases had nothing to do with whether or not she was raped. They were on whether or not it was right for her to not cheer and right for the school to kick her off the squad. All of those cases, including the appeals court, sided with the school and even called her lawsuit frivolous. So call me retarded all you want, but several judges and jurors tend to agree with me.
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,360
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
> Innocent until proven guilty. He plead guilty to a lesser charge, and convicted on the lesser charge. If he wasn't convicted of rape, then he's not guilty of rape.
Agreed. He's guilty of the assault he acknowledged. He's not "innocent" by a long shot, and no court stated such.
> Regardless of what he did, or what the court said, I stand by my previous analogy and I side with the school. If she doesn't want to cheer for him she doesn't have to be on the cheer squad.
You think she should have to quit because of this? While he's the one who's admitted to sexual assault? It's extraordinarily unjust to her. He can quit, too -- or better yet, get kicked off the team because he assaulted someone.
> The other court cases had nothing to do with whether or not she was raped. [blah blah blah, agreeing with the facts that everyone else pointed out]
In other words, you're backtracking. Several courts did not say that he didn't rape her; as you now agree, the bulk of the legal wrangling has been over the school's actions. Additionally, there wasn't actually a rape trial (as you previously claimed); he pleaded to sexual assault before it went to trial.
I'm glad you finally did some reading on the case.
However, I'd like to go back to an earlier statement you made...
> I'm guessing that there's more to this story than the article leads one to believe, and she's probably a bitch.
and just reiterate that you're a terrible person. Go to hell.
> Innocent until proven guilty. He plead guilty to a lesser charge, and convicted on the lesser charge. If he wasn't convicted of rape, then he's not guilty of rape.
Agreed. He's guilty of the assault he acknowledged. He's not "innocent" by a long shot, and no court stated such.
> Regardless of what he did, or what the court said, I stand by my previous analogy and I side with the school. If she doesn't want to cheer for him she doesn't have to be on the cheer squad.
You think she should have to quit because of this? While he's the one who's admitted to sexual assault? It's extraordinarily unjust to her. He can quit, too -- or better yet, get kicked off the team because he assaulted someone.
> The other court cases had nothing to do with whether or not she was raped. [blah blah blah, agreeing with the facts that everyone else pointed out]
In other words, you're backtracking. Several courts did not say that he didn't rape her; as you now agree, the bulk of the legal wrangling has been over the school's actions. Additionally, there wasn't actually a rape trial (as you previously claimed); he pleaded to sexual assault before it went to trial.
I'm glad you finally did some reading on the case.
However, I'd like to go back to an earlier statement you made...
> I'm guessing that there's more to this story than the article leads one to believe, and she's probably a bitch.
and just reiterate that you're a terrible person. Go to hell.
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,367
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,369
Anonymous B triple-posted this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,370
Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,373
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,384
Anonymous B double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,386
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,412
Foxygen !xVulpesUUg joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,452
Eagerly awaiting the beckystorm.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 11 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,823
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,851
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,859
...tgcomix?
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 47 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,947
Fuck you Broseph, you're not funny
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,952
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,954
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,958
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,961
Did anyone else expect Cunt to be more vicious?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,962
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,991
@142,952 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I don't think it really has anything to do with her being angry. I'm gonna go ahead and speak on her behalf when I say that broseph is an obnoxious twat. He seems to try and force humor in a very lame manner (example: this thread), and I'm guessing that's because he's not naturally funny. I don't think it's really a stretch to say that a lot of people find him annoying. Cunt is just one of the few people who isn't afraid to namefag while calling him out. I mean shit, look at her name. She certainly lives up to it and that's awesome.
I don't think it really has anything to do with her being angry. I'm gonna go ahead and speak on her behalf when I say that broseph is an obnoxious twat. He seems to try and force humor in a very lame manner (example: this thread), and I'm guessing that's because he's not naturally funny. I don't think it's really a stretch to say that a lot of people find him annoying. Cunt is just one of the few people who isn't afraid to namefag while calling him out. I mean shit, look at her name. She certainly lives up to it and that's awesome.
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA replied with this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #142,992
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #143,000
@142,961 (Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ)
Not much material to work with. Most Broseph posts are 200+ words with at least 5 factual errors. Not much to flame him about here.
@142,991 (L)
<3
Not much material to work with. Most Broseph posts are 200+ words with at least 5 factual errors. Not much to flame him about here.
@142,991 (L)
<3
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #143,013
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #143,024
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Well of course that's subjective, but to answer your question, yes, he really is that annoying.
Well of course that's subjective, but to answer your question, yes, he really is that annoying.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #143,033
I think Broseph is socially awkward, but basically harmless, he seems to piss women off naturally, not a curse I'd ever want to have lol.