Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Go onto the site r04r and open it yourself in Photoshop. I think it's on the offical government agency website. I don't have a link for it currently because I'm on the iTouch but I can get you one later if you don't find it.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,599
@previous (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
I have no idea where to find it.
Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,604
How do you can bullshit? The file is there for anyone to download and view. It's divided into fucking layers, I'm sure you're well aware a scanned piece of paper isn't broken down into layers.
r04r replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,622
@previous (Handel !khEOdtKF56)
And if you look at what's left when the layers are toggled its a white-ish outline of the original. More like touching it up because it ended up being unreadable.
If it really was faked like that they would've taken it down and replaced it with a non-layered version already.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,624
I care but it's impossible to prove anything I say deal with it nerd. :')
What's more important is stopping his wars in Libya and Yemen and ending the Bush/Obama wars of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Bring home all overseas troops. Use the money saved to pay for social security. Allow young people to opt out of social security. Remove unconstitutional federal departments.
This could all be done now! Birth certificate is so unimportant. People are dying!
Handel !khEOdtKF56 replied with this 15 years ago, 8 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,625
> Provides ocular evidence of a forgery > Refutes claim
> If the american goverment wanted to fake stuff they'd just print out a legit copy and scan that in.
Ya because there wouldn't be a hundred questions asked. If I said this was my birth certificate and someone showed you evidence of it being a forgery you would accept the fact it was a forgery. Why did it take him so long to produce the document? Why is it in a PDF format and not a simple JPEG? Why has no one seen the document with their own eyes. See this how it is r04r, a forgery.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,640
> But that’s not so, says Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator. > “You should not be so suspicious about this,†Tremblay told FoxNews.com, dismissing the allegations. > He said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery. “I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,†he said. > Tremblay explained that the scanner optical character recognition (OCR) software attempts to translate characters or words in a photograph into text. He said the layers cited by the doubters shows that software at work – and nothing more.
Anonymous K double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,648
Again, if the US government really wanted to fake documents they would do so - they wouldn't make stupid mistakes and they would not use Adobe Illustrator or Photoshop, surely.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,649
Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,651
@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos) > Everyone makes stupid mistakes.
Sure, but the US government? Would they really make such a silly mistake?
Anonymous K double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,652
@142,649 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos) > That makes sense.
It does, I can't believe it was on the usually anti-Obama Fox News.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,655
@142,651 (K)
It is improbable but not impossible and, considering the improbability of the allegations to begin with, not unreasonable for proponents of the theory to believe.
RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#142,656
I like Fox because they (used to) argue against Ron Paul (now they claim to like him, but I don't trust their honesty) whereas other networks would dismiss him or make fun of him.