Topic: UKEnglanders can't even speak English correctly, yet they criticize bilingual Americans.
Anonymous A started this discussion 7 years ago #81,220
When UKEnglanders travel to continental Europe, they are puzzled by the existence of other languages, for they think that the world revolves around England. Sadly for them, that is not the case. They are bland, obnoxious, nasally, uncultured, uncivilized, uneducated, and drunkenly speak only English when touring lands foreign to them, despite being only 18 miles from the nearest country. Also, they make bland fucking boiled beef and potatoes and think it is "delicious food."
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #943,125
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #943,126
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #943,127
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #943,130
Reply is too Replies not OP -
Its not so simple as just leaving the other guy alone. USA and England are often blamed for getting in2 WW II much too late.
IF in fact you know the OTHER guy is planning on taking over the world which wood include YOU - Then one has to consider if one wants to be a Puppet or is going to be its own master.
So USA in Korea WRONG WRONG
USA in Vietnam Wrong Wrong
USA in Afghanistan as Black Ops when Russian was invading - I felt and Afghanistan felt USA and Pakistan Saudi Arabia and Egypt & Israel who all worked together in the Black Ops mode to help Afghanistan remain independent - That was a Good deal in the 80's. Cost 2 USA was cheep as Saudi Arabia paid the bulk costs. No one today has a real clue Y Russian wanted Afghanistan.
Frankly after working there for the most part of a full decade - I doubt the tribes can ever be organized in any sense that wood make sense 2 them or USA in the long run. Its Tribes vs Tribes and we have no business trying to change the current set up.
Great people but really still living in the 5th century or so. Maybe 8th or 11th but no way near 18th Century.
Its not so simple as just leaving the other guy alone. USA and England are often blamed for getting in2 WW II much too late.
IF in fact you know the OTHER guy is planning on taking over the world which wood include YOU - Then one has to consider if one wants to be a Puppet or is going to be its own master.
So USA in Korea WRONG WRONG
USA in Vietnam Wrong Wrong
USA in Afghanistan as Black Ops when Russian was invading - I felt and Afghanistan felt USA and Pakistan Saudi Arabia and Egypt & Israel who all worked together in the Black Ops mode to help Afghanistan remain independent - That was a Good deal in the 80's. Cost 2 USA was cheep as Saudi Arabia paid the bulk costs. No one today has a real clue Y Russian wanted Afghanistan.
Frankly after working there for the most part of a full decade - I doubt the tribes can ever be organized in any sense that wood make sense 2 them or USA in the long run. Its Tribes vs Tribes and we have no business trying to change the current set up.
Great people but really still living in the 5th century or so. Maybe 8th or 11th but no way near 18th Century.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #943,131
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #943,220
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #943,223
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #943,224
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #943,225
Captain Kate Carr joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #943,226
England is actually 0 miles from the nearest country