Topic: I swear I think I might actually be an otherkin and it's seriously upsetting me.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 started this discussion 7 years ago #81,116
Every day I feel like I yearn to identify as a robot. A gynoid to be more specific. I don't know if a certain cartoon when I was a kid ruined me. I have no idea why I yearn to be a "human robot" and spend time questioning how I could be more robot-like. I am starting to feel more and more deranged now. I think an irony here is that I have thoughts about how to become what I yearn to identify as whereas otherkin would likely revert back to their natural human instincts. I am fucking losing it.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #942,349
silver paint and a metal buttplug
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 59 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,350
Gynoid? That is fucked up
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 7 years ago, 35 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,351
Mods is this really Catherine?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,354
@OP
> gynoid
Do you feel like it's weird to ascribe sex or gender to a robot? That sounds like it's more of a robot-trying-to-be-human kind of issue.
> gynoid
Do you feel like it's weird to ascribe sex or gender to a robot? That sounds like it's more of a robot-trying-to-be-human kind of issue.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,356
@942,350 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Isn't a gynoid just the name for a "female robot?"
Android really means "male robot," right?
Isn't a gynoid just the name for a "female robot?"
Android really means "male robot," right?
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,357
Robots are kind of like slaves if you think about it ?
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 35 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,358
I'd like to be easily repaired and maintained
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 4 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,359
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 13 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,360
@942,356 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
How can there even be such a thing as a male or female robot? You have a fetish and might be autistic. I'm not even joking, you 100% have a fetish.
How can there even be such a thing as a male or female robot? You have a fetish and might be autistic. I'm not even joking, you 100% have a fetish.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 20 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,361
Whatever you do, DO NOT start dropping LSD into your eyes and staying up on meth until you hear "Crazy Train" by Ozzy Osbourne on radio static.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,362
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,363
@942,360 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Is it really a fetish if it's non-sexual though? ?
And I would imagine robotic gender is because their programmers designed it that way. I mean, Alexa has a female name, and a female voice, but she doesn't have a biological sex because she is a machine.
Plus aren't the terms "android" and "gynoid" mostly used in science fiction stories anyway?
But I should have specified because I should have asked if I was using the term "gynoid" in an incorrect definition and if what I was told was wrong. My apologies. ?
Is it really a fetish if it's non-sexual though? ?
And I would imagine robotic gender is because their programmers designed it that way. I mean, Alexa has a female name, and a female voice, but she doesn't have a biological sex because she is a machine.
Plus aren't the terms "android" and "gynoid" mostly used in science fiction stories anyway?
But I should have specified because I should have asked if I was using the term "gynoid" in an incorrect definition and if what I was told was wrong. My apologies. ?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,365
Don't worry. It's just one of your many phases. Tomorrow you'll want to take up skiing or something, and you'll forget all about this.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,366
@942,363 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
Even Alexa doesn't have a fucking gender. And it is sexual for you, so stop lying. I don't believe that you are trans anymore, I am not sure at the very least.
Even Alexa doesn't have a fucking gender. And it is sexual for you, so stop lying. I don't believe that you are trans anymore, I am not sure at the very least.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,368
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I fail to see how this is sexual and I'm not sure why you think I am lying.
If a fetish could be something non-sexual then I would agree with you that this could be a fetish, but I'm not sure if fetishes exist non-sexually.
And I think we're in agreement about Alexa not having a gender.
@942,365 (I)
Yeah, I assume this myself and yet the thought always returns. I hate it so much. Of course, I posted this on /lgbt/ and I saved a very helpful post somewhere on my hard drive, so maybe I should give that another read should I find it. It suggested that this might just be a feeling of isolation and that I cannot connect with other people due to differences.
I fail to see how this is sexual and I'm not sure why you think I am lying.
If a fetish could be something non-sexual then I would agree with you that this could be a fetish, but I'm not sure if fetishes exist non-sexually.
And I think we're in agreement about Alexa not having a gender.
@942,365 (I)
Yeah, I assume this myself and yet the thought always returns. I hate it so much. Of course, I posted this on /lgbt/ and I saved a very helpful post somewhere on my hard drive, so maybe I should give that another read should I find it. It suggested that this might just be a feeling of isolation and that I cannot connect with other people due to differences.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 10 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,369
"A gynoid is anything that resembles or pertains to the female human form. Though the term android refers to robotic humanoids regardless of apparent gender, the Greek prefix "andr-" refers to man in the masculine gendered sense."Given there is a huge Market currently for Sex Robots one can imagine that one day there will be Humans who wish to Role Play as one of these Sex Robots
No doubt this is Irony of the most perverted order or is that disorder?
This is a facility that offered me a Consulting position years ago when they wanted to expand and as you can see this set up is for Head Jobs of a 2nd Order - Location is North of Me In San Marcos California
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,370
@942,368 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
Because its yet another way where you want to be forced into being a woman, and you get a sexual thrill from it.
Because its yet another way where you want to be forced into being a woman, and you get a sexual thrill from it.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 10 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,371
@942,363 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
Do you feel like life would be easier if you had clearly assigned traits and knew you were designed for a specific purpose?
Do you feel like life would be easier if you had clearly assigned traits and knew you were designed for a specific purpose?
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 46 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,372
@942,369 (Syntax)
Didn't the term "android" start with the meaning "male robot" and much like the word "man" changed its definition?
"Man" used to refer to humans in general thus the term "mankind."
Wouldn't "android" be the reverse situation? It started as a reference to "male robots" and changed its definition to refer to "all robots?"
Didn't the term "android" start with the meaning "male robot" and much like the word "man" changed its definition?
"Man" used to refer to humans in general thus the term "mankind."
Wouldn't "android" be the reverse situation? It started as a reference to "male robots" and changed its definition to refer to "all robots?"
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,374
@previous (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
As a Young Teen I was a fan of Si Fi stories and the term Android as I remember it was more common than Robots. Might be in error on that
Also sex robots back when I was reading Si Fi was rare very rare
an·droid
/ˈanˌdroid/
noun
noun: android; plural noun: androids; noun: Android
1.
(in science fiction) a robot with a human appearance.
synonyms: robot, automaton, cyborg, droid, bot
"a space station run by androids"
2.
trademark
an open-source operating system used for smartphones and tablet computers.
"I have an Android phone and I like it a lot"
Origin
/ˈanˌdroid/
noun
noun: android; plural noun: androids; noun: Android
1.
(in science fiction) a robot with a human appearance.
synonyms: robot, automaton, cyborg, droid, bot
"a space station run by androids"
2.
trademark
an open-source operating system used for smartphones and tablet computers.
"I have an Android phone and I like it a lot"
Origin
As a Young Teen I was a fan of Si Fi stories and the term Android as I remember it was more common than Robots. Might be in error on that
Also sex robots back when I was reading Si Fi was rare very rare
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,375
@942,371 (D)
The way you put I think I have to answer yes, though, I'm not sure how that would differ from others who answer that question which I am thinking would be similar to mine. That thought sounds comforting to me since that would put me in a herd instead of being some kind of snowflake.
@942,370 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't even think I like the idea of being forced into womanhood anymore and I think that fetish faded for me a long time ago when I realized that I was pursuing transitioning on my own. I think that fetish arrived via a train of desperation for me. Also, yearning to be a robot doesn't give me a sexual thrill, if anything it gives me a cloud of confusion, emotions, and disgust in myself.
The way you put I think I have to answer yes, though, I'm not sure how that would differ from others who answer that question which I am thinking would be similar to mine. That thought sounds comforting to me since that would put me in a herd instead of being some kind of snowflake.
@942,370 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't even think I like the idea of being forced into womanhood anymore and I think that fetish faded for me a long time ago when I realized that I was pursuing transitioning on my own. I think that fetish arrived via a train of desperation for me. Also, yearning to be a robot doesn't give me a sexual thrill, if anything it gives me a cloud of confusion, emotions, and disgust in myself.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,376
haha oh lord
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,377
@942,374 (Syntax)
I'm intrigued about why the coiner of the word chose to use that prefix now.
Upon learning about the term "gynoid" my brain automatically assumed it was just words shifting their meanings like the word "bully" which I have no idea how the fuck that came to mean something entirely different.
I'm intrigued about why the coiner of the word chose to use that prefix now.
Upon learning about the term "gynoid" my brain automatically assumed it was just words shifting their meanings like the word "bully" which I have no idea how the fuck that came to mean something entirely different.
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,378
@previous (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
To be Honest I had not run into Gynoid until this thread. Of course I did not waste my time in study of Language for 30+ years.
To be Honest I had not run into Gynoid until this thread. Of course I did not waste my time in study of Language for 30+ years.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 48 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,379
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,380
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynoid
The term gynoid was first used by Gwyneth Jones in her 1985 novel Divine Endurance to describe a robot slave character in a futuristic China who is judged by her beauty.
Gynoid is also used in American English medical terminology as a shortening of the term gynecoid (gynaecoid in British English
In 1983, a busty female robot named "Sweetheart" was removed from a display at the Lawrence Hall of Science after a petition was presented claiming it was insulting to women. The robot's creator, Clayton Bailey, a professor of art at California State University, Hayward called this "censorship" and "next to book burning
The term gynoid was first used by Gwyneth Jones in her 1985 novel Divine Endurance to describe a robot slave character in a futuristic China who is judged by her beauty.
Gynoid is also used in American English medical terminology as a shortening of the term gynecoid (gynaecoid in British English
In 1983, a busty female robot named "Sweetheart" was removed from a display at the Lawrence Hall of Science after a petition was presented claiming it was insulting to women. The robot's creator, Clayton Bailey, a professor of art at California State University, Hayward called this "censorship" and "next to book burning
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,383
@942,375 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
> That thought sounds comforting to me since that would put me in a herd instead of being some kind of snowflake.
I'm just wondering if the scenario sounds appealing because you feel like it would easily resolve some aspects of your personality or identity that you are unsure about.
> That thought sounds comforting to me since that would put me in a herd instead of being some kind of snowflake.
I'm just wondering if the scenario sounds appealing because you feel like it would easily resolve some aspects of your personality or identity that you are unsure about.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 29 seconds later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,384
@942,378 (Syntax)
I heard it from Minichan months/years ago. Unless that was on the IRC.
@942,380 (Syntax)
> a robot slave character
> slave
> judged by her beauty
> slave
Kook's right, the word has a sexual connotation. ?
@942,379 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why do you want to be a robot then?
That's a question I ask myself, but I think @942,371 (D) could be onto something now that I contemplate their question.
> clearly assigned traits and knew you were designed for a specific purpose
This sounds marvelous to me.
I heard it from Minichan months/years ago. Unless that was on the IRC.
@942,380 (Syntax)
> a robot slave character
> slave
> judged by her beauty
> slave
Kook's right, the word has a sexual connotation. ?
@942,379 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why do you want to be a robot then?
That's a question I ask myself, but I think @942,371 (D) could be onto something now that I contemplate their question.
> clearly assigned traits and knew you were designed for a specific purpose
This sounds marvelous to me.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,386
Mental retardation. That's what you have
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,388
@942,384 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
Not kidding here - I can see you as a Robot. For sure not a sexual one because so far you do appear to be perhaps the first asexual person I have come across on net and have never met one in R/L (That I am aware of)
Not kidding here - I can see you as a Robot. For sure not a sexual one because so far you do appear to be perhaps the first asexual person I have come across on net and have never met one in R/L (That I am aware of)
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 48 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,389
@942,383 (D)
Yeah, I think you might have struck gold because that question is still rolling around in my head. The "specific purpose" part of it mostly, though, clearly assigned traits does sound appealing. It feels like it would be nice to just have my personality laid out in front of me without losing the choice of what gender I am. As if that is the only thing in my life that I ever came to a confident decision about, it might actually be ???, other than that I have no fucking clue as to who I am identity-wise.
Yeah, I think you might have struck gold because that question is still rolling around in my head. The "specific purpose" part of it mostly, though, clearly assigned traits does sound appealing. It feels like it would be nice to just have my personality laid out in front of me without losing the choice of what gender I am. As if that is the only thing in my life that I ever came to a confident decision about, it might actually be ???, other than that I have no fucking clue as to who I am identity-wise.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #942,390
@942,388 (Syntax)
Catherine is not asexual
She has sexual fantasies frequently
Catherine is not asexual
She has sexual fantasies frequently
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,391
@942,388 (Syntax)
I still question if I am asexual though, but I think I grasp what you're telling me. Are you saying that you think I am "the first true asexual" person you've ever met in terms of libido? I've asked around the asexual community a few times and even they don't seem to be asexual in how the average person may think an asexual person would be.
@942,386 (L)
This feels like a sarcastic response so prepare for a sarcastic answer. ?
I'm, at least, average intelligence so therefore I'm not mentally retarded. ?
I still question if I am asexual though, but I think I grasp what you're telling me. Are you saying that you think I am "the first true asexual" person you've ever met in terms of libido? I've asked around the asexual community a few times and even they don't seem to be asexual in how the average person may think an asexual person would be.
@942,386 (L)
This feels like a sarcastic response so prepare for a sarcastic answer. ?
I'm, at least, average intelligence so therefore I'm not mentally retarded. ?
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,393
@942,390 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
"Frequently" might not be the right word, but I agree with you. Because of these sexual fantasies, they are the reasons why I question if I am truly asexual (which might not actually fucking exist due to reasons I noted above), though I have found myself questioning why I have some of the sexual fantasies that I have. I think some of them may have faded like that forced womanhood one.
"Frequently" might not be the right word, but I agree with you. Because of these sexual fantasies, they are the reasons why I question if I am truly asexual (which might not actually fucking exist due to reasons I noted above), though I have found myself questioning why I have some of the sexual fantasies that I have. I think some of them may have faded like that forced womanhood one.
Anonymous D replied with this 7 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,394
@942,389 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
Well, don't feel like you have to come up with concrete answers all the time. People's identities can be pretty fluid over their lifetimes. It's okay not to know. It sounds like it's a question that really bothers you though.
Well, don't feel like you have to come up with concrete answers all the time. People's identities can be pretty fluid over their lifetimes. It's okay not to know. It sounds like it's a question that really bothers you though.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,397
@previous (D)
> don't feel like you have to come up with concrete answers all the time
I think this might be the reason why a fucking design class which encourages creativity is more difficult for me than mathematics.
In math, at least, there are a few different directions to solving a problem than an infinite amount of ways in art.
> don't feel like you have to come up with concrete answers all the time
I think this might be the reason why a fucking design class which encourages creativity is more difficult for me than mathematics.
In math, at least, there are a few different directions to solving a problem than an infinite amount of ways in art.
Syntax replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,400
@942,391 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
> I still question if I am asexual though, but I think I grasp what you're telling me. Are you saying that you think I am "the first true asexual" person >you've ever met in terms of libido? I've asked around the asexual community a few times and even they don't seem to be asexual in how the average person may think an asexual person would be.
Hummmm I only concluded the asexual as a for sure in my mind because of how much trouble you had getting that Sperm Sample - However I was unaware you had dreams that included sex sooooooooooooooooooooooooo just Hummmmmmmmm
> I still question if I am asexual though, but I think I grasp what you're telling me. Are you saying that you think I am "the first true asexual" person >you've ever met in terms of libido? I've asked around the asexual community a few times and even they don't seem to be asexual in how the average person may think an asexual person would be.
Hummmm I only concluded the asexual as a for sure in my mind because of how much trouble you had getting that Sperm Sample - However I was unaware you had dreams that included sex sooooooooooooooooooooooooo just Hummmmmmmmm
Anonymous B replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,401
@942,393 (Catherine !ttGirlsPl2)
If you don't even think asexuality is real then how can you be asexual?
If you don't even think asexuality is real then how can you be asexual?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,402
Domo arigato Mr. Roboto.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,403
Actually, Kook, I'm sorry, I might have actually lied since upon further reflection there were a few times I have often wondered what it would be like to be a sex robot (doll mostly not so much bot) like in @942,380 (Syntax). I think this quick reflection made me realized that I was telling a lie even though I thought I wasn't.
Though I think this goes deeper than a sexual fetish since I rarely have such fantasies. I'm more likely thinking about what my life would be like if I had been designed by a manufacturer than what sex would be like. Which is why if fetishes could be non-sexual then the non-sexual fetish might overlap with whatever sexual fetish there would be. Though I do question if the servitude aspect of this could pertain to what you're suggesting, that is something that I was questioning prior to the making of this thread.
I believe that both you and Anonymous D raise good points.
I hate the feeling of wanting to be a Reverse Data off of Star Trek.
Though I think this goes deeper than a sexual fetish since I rarely have such fantasies. I'm more likely thinking about what my life would be like if I had been designed by a manufacturer than what sex would be like. Which is why if fetishes could be non-sexual then the non-sexual fetish might overlap with whatever sexual fetish there would be. Though I do question if the servitude aspect of this could pertain to what you're suggesting, that is something that I was questioning prior to the making of this thread.
I believe that both you and Anonymous D raise good points.
I hate the feeling of wanting to be a Reverse Data off of Star Trek.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #942,408
@OP
> Every day I feel like I yearn to identify as a robot. A gynoid to be more specific. I don't know if a certain cartoon when I was a kid ruined me. I have no idea why I yearn to be a "human robot" and spend time questioning how I could be more robot-like. I am starting to feel more and more deranged now. I think an irony here is that I have thoughts about how to become what I yearn to identify as whereas otherkin would likely revert back to their natural human instincts. I am fucking losing it.
Why dont you go out in town for some coffee somewhere and repeat the above to the people sitting around you. Try that.
> Every day I feel like I yearn to identify as a robot. A gynoid to be more specific. I don't know if a certain cartoon when I was a kid ruined me. I have no idea why I yearn to be a "human robot" and spend time questioning how I could be more robot-like. I am starting to feel more and more deranged now. I think an irony here is that I have thoughts about how to become what I yearn to identify as whereas otherkin would likely revert back to their natural human instincts. I am fucking losing it.
Why dont you go out in town for some coffee somewhere and repeat the above to the people sitting around you. Try that.
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) replied with this 7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #942,409
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 (OP) double-posted this 7 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #942,688
I think I know why I might feel this way. I think it's sometimes because I imagine what it might be like to lack emotion. Still contemplating though.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #942,689
You should really try sucking someone’s cock.